2009 Performance Accountability Report Vol. 2 - Maryland Higher ...

the percentage employed within one year of graduation declined slightly, this is likely a trend
across many universities resulting from the current economy. We expect these percentages to
return as the fiscal situation improves. To improve subsequent second-year retention for our
African American and minority students, SU has implemented a Center for Student
Achievement, but it has been underfunded given the current budget. This center will serve as a
central location where students can get academic guidance, support and resources. Additionally,
the implementation of a math assessment program will also assist the University in identifying
those students that may experience difficulty in math and science classes and help remediate
their weaknesses and thus improve student success. It is expected that these initiatives will
improve retention and graduation rates in subsequent years.
KEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goal 1. Provide a quality undergraduate and graduate academic and learning environment that promotes
intellectual growth and success.
Objective 1.1 Increase the percentage of nursing graduates who pass on the first attempt the nursing
licensure exam from 85% in 2004 to 90% in 2009.
2006 2007 2008 2009
Performance Measures Actual Actual Actual Actual
Quality Nursing (NCLEX) exam pass rate 73% 83% 90% 95%
Objective 1.2 Increase the percentage of teacher education graduates who pass the teacher licensure exam
from 91% in 2004 to 97% in 2009.
2006 2007 2008 2009
Performance Measures Actual Actual Actual Actual
Quality Teaching (PRAXIS II) pass rate 1
91% 92% 94% 95%
Objective 1.3 Through 2009, the percentage of SU graduates who are satisfied with their level of preparation
for graduate or professional school will be no less than 98%.
2006 2007 2008 2009
Survey Survey Survey Survey
Performance Measures
Satisfaction w/preparation for
Actual Actual Actual Actual
Quality graduate school 2
99% 99% 100% 98%
Objective 1.4 Through 2009, the percentage of SU graduates who are satisfied with their level of preparation
for employment will be no less than the 98% achieved in 2004.
2006 2007 2008 2009
Survey Survey Survey Survey
Performance Measures
Satisfaction w/preparation for
Actual Actual Actual Actual
Quality employment 2
99% 98% 99% 99%
298