2009 Performance Accountability Report Vol. 2 - Maryland Higher ...

Performance measures for this goal are being met. Results of Coppin State University’s alumni
survey shows that 97% of Coppin’s graduates are satisfied with their preparation for graduate or
professional school (Objective 5.1). Similarly, alumni also report a high level of satisfaction
with their preparation for employment (Objective 5.2), a goal we have established in the 90
percentile.
MFR Goal 6: Increase revenue from alternative sources to state appropriations.
MSP Goal 1: Maintain and strengthen a preeminent statewide array of postsecondary
education institutions recognized nationally for academic excellence and
effectiveness in fulfilling the educational needs of students, the state and
the nation.
Progress Made
Funds from the Coppin Development Foundation have been small but are an essential revenue
source. These funds have been used for faculty development, endowed faculty chairs, student
scholarships, cultural enrichment programs and the Coppin Academy. From FY 2004 to FY
2008, a total of $4.4 million was raised.
In 2008, a Vice President for Institutional Advancement was appointed and the division has been
reorganized, including the hiring of a major gifts director to help raise more philanthropic
revenue.
Federal Funds – Title III
Coppin State University receives funds through Title III of the Higher Education Act
of 1965. The program helps eligible colleges and universities to become self-sufficient and
expand their capacity to serve low-income students by providing funds to improve and
strengthen the academic quality, institutional management, and fiscal stability of eligible
institutions. Funds may be used for planning, faculty development, and establishing endowment
funds.
Administrative management, and the development and improvement of academic
programs also are supported. Other projects include joint use of instructional facilities,
construction and maintenance, and student services. CSU has been a recipient of Title III
funding since 1992. Funds are used to support initiatives for student retention, library
enhancement, honors program, faculty and staff development, and community development.
Accomplishments, Challenges, and Future Directions
The performance objectives for this goal are being met. The percentage of private giving for
scholarships rose from 36% in FY 2006 to 56% in 2008. Likewise, given the limited resources
at its disposal, CSU was able to save 4% of its operating budget through cost containment
measures in FY 2009.
259