10.04.2013 Views

The Genre of Trolls - Doria

The Genre of Trolls - Doria

The Genre of Trolls - Doria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

conception <strong>of</strong> the troll. 1 <strong>The</strong> objects <strong>of</strong> analysis are two texts from the repertoire<br />

<strong>of</strong> a single narrator, the carpenter Johan Alén hailing from the village<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rejpelt in the parish <strong>of</strong> Vörå. <strong>The</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> genre utilized here<br />

is that presented by Charles Briggs and Richard Bauman in their article<br />

“<strong>Genre</strong>, Intertextuality, and Social Power” (1992). <strong>Genre</strong>s are viewed as<br />

“generalized or abstracted models <strong>of</strong> discourse production and reception”<br />

mediated through the relationship with prior discourse (Briggs & Bauman<br />

1992: 147). Through genre, narrators may shape speech into ordered, unified<br />

and bounded texts with strong social and historical associations,<br />

though the invocation <strong>of</strong> genre also renders texts fragmented, heterogeneous<br />

and open-ended because <strong>of</strong> the dependence on other discursive formations<br />

and contextual factors for the interpretation, production and reception<br />

<strong>of</strong> discourse (Briggs & Bauman 1992: 147–149). Briggs and Bauman<br />

emphasize the role <strong>of</strong> the narrator in shaping and reconfiguring genres, and<br />

they introduce the notion <strong>of</strong> intertextual gaps, which can be minimized or<br />

maximized, to describe the process <strong>of</strong> connecting an utterance to a generic<br />

model. Minimization <strong>of</strong> the distance between texts and genres makes the<br />

discourse maximally interpretable through reference to generic precedents,<br />

while maximization is associated with various motives for distancing oneself<br />

from textual precedents (Briggs & Bauman 1992: 149). In contrast to<br />

many earlier contributions to the folkloristic debate on genre, 2 Briggs and<br />

Bauman focus on how genres actually work, not on how they should be defined<br />

or on their source-critical value, whether they are useful or deplorable<br />

concepts, whether emic or etic categories should be used, or whether generic<br />

designations ought to be employed in the classification <strong>of</strong> folklore in<br />

tradition archives. This is <strong>of</strong> particular import in an analysis <strong>of</strong> the intertextual<br />

constitution <strong>of</strong> genre.<br />

<strong>The</strong> question <strong>of</strong> genre is also actualized in relation to parody, <strong>of</strong> which<br />

the two texts are specimens. Parodies are sometimes cited as prime examples<br />

<strong>of</strong> intertextuality (Dentith 2000: 5–6) due to their overt connection to<br />

another, or several other, texts or to a genre. My hypothesis is that these<br />

1 Here I am using the adjective generic to refer to genre, as Charles Briggs and Richard<br />

Bauman have done.<br />

2 See e.g. Abrahams 1976a; Abrahams 1976b; Honko 1968; Honko 1971; Honko 1976;<br />

Honko 1981; Honko 1989; Ben-Amos 1976a; Ben-Amos 1976b; Ben-Amos 1992; Klintberg<br />

1981; Alver 1967; Dégh 1976; Dégh & Vázsonyi 1976; Lüthi 1976; von Sydow 1971a; von<br />

Sydow 1971b; von Sydow 1971c.<br />

4<br />

Introduction

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!