10.04.2013 Views

The Genre of Trolls - Doria

The Genre of Trolls - Doria

The Genre of Trolls - Doria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

forest—which are connected by metonymy, combining elements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

same conceptual order into a sequence, and bridging the distance between<br />

the poles <strong>of</strong> the metaphor. In linguistic parlance, metaphorical relations are<br />

paradigmatic, whereas metonymic ones are syntagmatic. As instances <strong>of</strong><br />

metonymy Tarkka mentions the concepts <strong>of</strong> dialogue and communication,<br />

and rituals involving communication with the otherworld (cf. chapter 1.1 on<br />

the difference between Tarkka’s notions and common usage). Intertextual<br />

relations, generated by the use <strong>of</strong> common themes and epithets, for instance,<br />

and forming an intertextual universe, are conceived as a series <strong>of</strong><br />

metaphors, each constituent being comparable but not identical to the<br />

others (Tarkka 1994: 293–294; cf. Tarkka 1998b). This approach facilitates<br />

an investigation <strong>of</strong> networks <strong>of</strong> association in which similar themes recur in<br />

a variety <strong>of</strong> texts, <strong>of</strong>ten representing different genres. I will return to this<br />

topic in the discussion <strong>of</strong> intergenericity.<br />

In her dissertation Magic, Body and Social Order (1998), Laura Stark-Arola<br />

adopts Lotte Tarkka’s notion <strong>of</strong> the intertextual universe as an organic<br />

whole in which a single text receives its meaning only in relation to other<br />

texts. She also discusses macro-texts, i.e., broader cultural traditions such as<br />

ritual descriptions <strong>of</strong> love magic, lempi-bathing and instances <strong>of</strong> women<br />

being perceived as polluting men, which gain meaning through their interrelation<br />

(Stark-Arola 1998: 67, 73). Nevertheless, the most important contribution<br />

made by Stark-Arola is perhaps the delineation <strong>of</strong> a concrete,<br />

intertextualist research method, something that has been largely missing in<br />

intertextual scholarship. Her deliberations on this point therefore deserve<br />

some attention.<br />

She takes her point <strong>of</strong> departure in the act <strong>of</strong> reading the whole corpus<br />

<strong>of</strong> texts to be analyzed, saying that the researcher forms a pre-comprehension<br />

<strong>of</strong> recurrent correspondences, homologies and analogies among and<br />

between the texts. A similar differentiation <strong>of</strong> the meanings contained in<br />

the texts, applicable to the larger corpus, is made as well. This preliminary<br />

picture constitutes the basis for the next step in the process <strong>of</strong> interpretation,<br />

the employment <strong>of</strong> the method <strong>of</strong> intertextual abstraction, as she calls<br />

it, which is glossed as the crystallization <strong>of</strong> the common denominators <strong>of</strong><br />

texts sporting the same theme into hypothetical generalizations like the<br />

core motifs she treats in her study. <strong>The</strong> farm house is an example <strong>of</strong> such a<br />

motif, organizing the relations between domains (home–village) and persons<br />

(members <strong>of</strong> the household–outsiders); core motifs are specifically de-<br />

26<br />

Introduction

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!