10.04.2013 Views

The Genre of Trolls - Doria

The Genre of Trolls - Doria

The Genre of Trolls - Doria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

e made in this context; firstly, the nature <strong>of</strong> interpretation in general is<br />

such that it is always influenced by individual and situational factors, and<br />

the correspondence or not <strong>of</strong> the folk’s readings <strong>of</strong> religious writings to<br />

interpretations sanctioned by theology becomes less important (cf. Wolf-<br />

Knuts 1991: 44). As a folklorist, it is my task to focus on popular interpretations,<br />

using the methods appropriate to my discipline. Secondly, these<br />

folk readings are not generated in a social vacuum. <strong>The</strong> 19th and early 20th<br />

century was the age <strong>of</strong> revivals, and despite the fact that individual religiosity<br />

came to the fore in this period, the revivals were highly social phenomena.<br />

Social networks <strong>of</strong> like-minded people were created, and forums—<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial and un<strong>of</strong>ficial—for the discussion <strong>of</strong> faith and religion were established.<br />

<strong>The</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong> religious works might have been a group<br />

activity, effected either in private conversation with one’s peers, or at more<br />

organized, collective meetings, perhaps involving preaching or exposition<br />

<strong>of</strong> a text. In other words, I assume both a private and a collective interpretation<br />

<strong>of</strong> religious texts, the former influenced by the needs <strong>of</strong> the individual,<br />

the latter conforming to collective patterns. However, even individual<br />

interpretations do not escape the touch <strong>of</strong> the collective, as everybody<br />

craves to be accepted by a peer group. In the following, I will therefore<br />

outline the religious life <strong>of</strong> the parish.<br />

Pietism found its first advocate in Jonas Lagus, curate <strong>of</strong> Vörå in 1817–<br />

1828, and when he moved to the Finnish-speaking parish <strong>of</strong> Ylivieska in<br />

1828, the revival did not abate. <strong>The</strong> movement stressed individual salvation<br />

attained through a person’s benevolent actions, and the significance <strong>of</strong> repentance.<br />

<strong>The</strong> revival has been regarded as legalistic, since it focused so<br />

much on the law <strong>of</strong> the Bible. In the 1830s Vörå emerged as a centre for<br />

the Pietist revival as some <strong>of</strong> the influential families joined the movement,<br />

including the sons <strong>of</strong> the parson. One <strong>of</strong> them, Johan Mikael Stenbäck,<br />

continued to promote Pietism as the curate <strong>of</strong> the parish in the beginning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 1840s; his temporary replacement on the post, Josef Reinhold<br />

Hedberg, did likewise. During these decades the religious meetings arranged<br />

by the movement attracted large audiences, and speakers from other<br />

communities were regularly enlisted. Many Pietists donned the old 18thcentury<br />

folk costume, the long-tailed jacket (skörtdräkt) for men and the<br />

kirtle for women. It was commonly worn in Vörå in the 1840s and 1850s,<br />

but subsequently disappeared in the 1860s. <strong>The</strong> old-fashioned dress functioned<br />

as a social marker, differentiating the pious from the rest <strong>of</strong> the pop-<br />

80<br />

Material and Context

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!