10.04.2013 Views

The Genre of Trolls - Doria

The Genre of Trolls - Doria

The Genre of Trolls - Doria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

epresentation, embodied in the image <strong>of</strong> a speaking person, and more importantly,<br />

it can be contested in a manner authoritative discourse cannot.<br />

<strong>The</strong> latter is indivisible and has to be accepted or rejected as a whole, whereas<br />

the former allows for acceptance or rejection <strong>of</strong> individual details. Resistance<br />

to internally persuasive discourse can be <strong>of</strong>fered by putting it in a<br />

new situation to expose its weak sides, or to locate its boundaries (Bakhtin<br />

1986a: 343, 347–348). That is how folklore proceeds in its dialogue with religious<br />

tradition, transferring the Garden <strong>of</strong> Eden with its connotation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

pristine, innocent state to the mainly pagan realm <strong>of</strong> supernatural beings<br />

associated with glamour and illusion, which is clearly beyond the boundaries<br />

<strong>of</strong> the religious discourse. At the same time it discloses the weakness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Christian doctrine, since it can promise salvation, virtually a return<br />

to Paradise, only in the afterlife. Paradise on earth is beyond the confines<br />

<strong>of</strong> its teachings, and that may have been perceived as a lack in the folk<br />

tradition, which consequently produced its own version <strong>of</strong> the primeval<br />

garden. Another example <strong>of</strong> the recontextualization <strong>of</strong> internally persuasive<br />

discourse is the transposition <strong>of</strong> the Biblical discourse <strong>of</strong> exorcism to<br />

the banishment <strong>of</strong> trolls. This transference serves to highlight the precariousness<br />

<strong>of</strong> such a discourse in the mouths <strong>of</strong> those who are unworthy to<br />

use it, hence to elucidate its limitations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> instances <strong>of</strong> agreement with the religious tradition must also be discussed.<br />

Here internally persuasive discourse has been persuasive, and the<br />

narrators <strong>of</strong> folklore have adopted its viewpoint. In contradistinction to the<br />

acceptance <strong>of</strong> authoritative discourse, it is a reasoned unanimity that has<br />

been subjected to and survived the crossfire <strong>of</strong> other competing discourses.<br />

Incidentally, those examples tend to focus on values that are social as well<br />

as Christian, and therefore doubly significant, for instance the avoidance <strong>of</strong><br />

fratricide or the injunction against vanity (see chapter 4.1).<br />

At this juncture it might be suitable to consider the link between power<br />

and subjectivity. In his examination <strong>of</strong> power relations “from the bottom<br />

up”, Michel Foucault has concentrated on the micro-mechanisms <strong>of</strong> power,<br />

that is the workings <strong>of</strong> power in everyday life (Foucault 1980: 101). <strong>The</strong><br />

techniques <strong>of</strong> power employed by the church to constitute individuals as<br />

Christian subjects consisted <strong>of</strong> forms <strong>of</strong> examination, for example. <strong>The</strong><br />

the New Testament, which uses the everyday language <strong>of</strong> the period, but regarding the<br />

Swedish translations all but the most recent, Bibel 2000, have favoured archaic language.<br />

216<br />

Intertextuality as Social Critique

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!