18.04.2013 Views

B2B Integration : A Practical Guide to Collaborative E-commerce

B2B Integration : A Practical Guide to Collaborative E-commerce

B2B Integration : A Practical Guide to Collaborative E-commerce

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

174 <strong>B2B</strong> <strong>Integration</strong> — A <strong>Practical</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Collaborative</strong> E-<strong>commerce</strong><br />

Continued from page 173<br />

human-readable and machine-processable vocabularies designed <strong>to</strong><br />

encourage the reuse and extension of metadata semantics among<br />

disparate information communities. The structural constraints RDF imposes<br />

<strong>to</strong> support the consistent encoding and exchange of standardized<br />

metadata provide for the interchangeabiUty of separate packages of<br />

metadata defined by different resource description communities.<br />

RDF integrates a variety of Web-based metadata activities including<br />

sitemaps, content ratings, stream channel definitions, search engine data<br />

collection (Web crawling), digital library collections and distributed<br />

authoring, using XML as an interchange syntax. RDF with digital<br />

signatures will be key <strong>to</strong> building the 'Web of Trust' for electronic<br />

<strong>commerce</strong>, collaboration and other applications.<br />

Source: www.w3.org/RDF<br />

6.4.9. Advantages of XML over traditional EDI<br />

Following are the advantages of XML over the traditional EDI:<br />

• Frees companies from the use of specific vendor software — With<br />

XML, companies can integrate business processes with their trading<br />

partners without having <strong>to</strong> use specific vendor software required for<br />

EDI.<br />

• Flexible standards — XML is based on simple, flexible and open<br />

standards, while EDI standards are very strict and inflexible. As a<br />

result, companies are able <strong>to</strong> au<strong>to</strong>mate the exchange of business<br />

information, dramatically improve efficiencies and reduce operating<br />

costs with the use of XML.<br />

• Cheaper — The initial setup and operational costs of EDI are very<br />

high. XML enables loose integration at a fraction of the effort and<br />

cost of traditional EDI.<br />

• Extensible — With XML, businesses do not need <strong>to</strong> replace or rebuild<br />

their applications; instead, they can simply XML-enable the data and<br />

systems they already have.<br />

• Human readable — XML is both machine and human readable while<br />

EDI is only machine-readable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!