24.06.2013 Views

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A NOTE UPON CHAP. XLVII.<br />

IT is commonly said, by learned moderns, that the Greek<br />

writers <strong>of</strong> the church have mistaken the name <strong>of</strong> Cornelius's<br />

rival, calling- him Novatus,'' and confounding this presbyter<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rome with the presbyter <strong>of</strong> Carthage: whereas his<br />

name, they say, was Novatianus, or Novatian. So Cave and<br />

Ruinart, and Petavius, not to mention any more. Hosce duos<br />

nominum similitudine decepti perpetuo fere confundunt<br />

scriptores Grseci. Cav. H. L. in Novatian. Quin ct ad<br />

ipsum Novatianum, quem Eusebius Novatum vocat, Graecorum<br />

more, qui Novati et Novatian i tiomina scepius confundunt.<br />

Ruin. Act. M. Sine, et Sel. de S. Dionys. Alex,<br />

n. vii. p. 180. GriBci enim Novatum et Novatianum inter se<br />

confuderunt, similitudine nominum decepti. Quo in errore<br />

fuit Eusebius noster. Vales. Annot. in Euseb. 1. vi. c. 45.<br />

1. My first argument therefore in support <strong>of</strong> the present<br />

assertion is, that this presbyter <strong>of</strong> Rome is generally called<br />

Novatus by the Greek writers; by Eusebius, and Socrates,<br />

and Sozomen, and divers others : and I know <strong>of</strong> no reason<br />

why they should be deceived herein. Eusebius had before<br />

him the letter <strong>of</strong> Cornelius to Fabius, bishop <strong>of</strong> Antioch,and<br />

the letter <strong>of</strong> Dionysius <strong>of</strong> Alexandria to this presbyter, and<br />

divers other letters <strong>of</strong> the same Dionysius, upon the controversy<br />

about receiving the lapsed : and the two last mentioned<br />

ecclesiastical historians were well acquainted with the Novatians<br />

at Constantinople, who may be supposed to have<br />

known the name <strong>of</strong> the founder <strong>of</strong> their sect. Let me add<br />

here, to all the Greek writers already mentioned, Athanasius<br />

who expressly says, that the Novatians were so called from<br />

Novatus; airo ^oHUTsNosaTiavoi. Orat. i. contr. Ar. p. 407. B.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong>re are still remainino- in Latin authors traces <strong>of</strong><br />

their agreement with the Greek writers upon this head. For<br />

this I allege the words <strong>of</strong> J. A. Fabricius : Eusebii et Rufini<br />

editiones, "koumtv Novato vi. 45. Sed Novatiano utique fuit<br />

itii nomen, non Novato, qui episropum Romanum se contra<br />

Cornel ium ordinari passus est anno 251, quo has ad cum<br />

litenis Dionysius Alexandrinus exaravit. Fabric, not. (f)<br />

ad Ilieron. de V. I. cap. 69. Rufinus therefore, in his trans-<br />

lation <strong>of</strong> Eusebius, at the place referred to, has Novatus, as<br />

Fabricius owns. I shall next allege a passage taken from<br />

tlie notes <strong>of</strong> the Benedictine editors <strong>of</strong> St. Ambrose's Avorks :<br />

Romana editio ubique Novatum fecit e Novatiano : qua<br />

» See note % p. 78.<br />

;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!