24.06.2013 Views

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vie Manichees. Sect. I. 269<br />

Chalcedoii, whose <strong>works</strong> he much commends, (whose time<br />

however is not now certainly known,) says, that, speaking<strong>of</strong><br />

others who had opposed the same sect before him, he<br />

names'* Hegemoniiis, who wrote the disputations <strong>of</strong> Archelaus<br />

with Mani; Titus, George <strong>of</strong> Laodicea, Serapion <strong>of</strong><br />

Thnuiis, and Diodorus, whose work against the Manichees<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> five-and-twenty books: this work <strong>of</strong> Diodorus<br />

<strong>of</strong> Tarsus is in Ebedjesu's' Catalogue, and therefore must<br />

liave been translated into Syriac. And Photius in his own<br />

work against the Manichees, or Paulicians, mentions" Cyril<br />

bishop <strong>of</strong> Jerusalem, Epiphanius, Titus <strong>of</strong> Bostra, Serapion<br />

<strong>of</strong> Thmuis, Alexander <strong>of</strong> Lycopolis, the twenty books <strong>of</strong><br />

Heraclean bishop <strong>of</strong> Chalcedon, upon whom he again<br />

bestows great commendations :<br />

but we have now nothing' <strong>of</strong><br />

that work remaining beside the extracts made by Photius.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> piece <strong>of</strong> Alexander just mentioned, written in<br />

Greek, who was <strong>of</strong> Lycus, a city <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong>bais in Egypt, is<br />

still in^ being". Fabricius supposeth that'" he was at first<br />

a heathen and Manichee, afterwards a catholic christian.<br />

CavC thinks he was originally a heathen, next a Manichee,<br />

in the end a catholic : he says that he is a very ancient<br />

writer, probably <strong>of</strong> the fourth century. Photius, as before<br />

cited, calls himy archbishop <strong>of</strong> Cyropolis: but Beausobre<br />

argues that^ he was a mere heathen or pagan philosopher,<br />

as he calls him. Tillemont likewise says, that ' by'' his<br />

' book he appears to have been a pagan philosopher, who,<br />

' observing that some <strong>of</strong> his fellow disciples emlDraced the<br />

* opinion <strong>of</strong> the Manichees, wrote this piece to confute it by<br />

' natural and philosophical reasons. He speaks with some<br />

' respect <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ, and prefers the doctrine <strong>of</strong> the<br />

' churches [thej are his own words] to that <strong>of</strong> Mani : but<br />

' it may be perceived by those very places that he is by<br />

' no means a christian.' I do not choose to enter at present<br />

the reader,<br />

into any debate about the character <strong>of</strong> this writer :<br />

if he pleaseth, may consult the work itself, and the modern<br />

to Avhom I have referred : I shall only say that the Manichees<br />

were christians. If ever Alexander was a Manichee<br />

» Cod. 85. p. 204. ' Vid. Assem. Bib. Or. T. 3. P. i. p. 29.<br />

" Ph. contr. Manich. 1. i. cap. xi. " Ap. Combefis. Auct. Nov.<br />

" Alexandri Lycopolitae ex Ethnico Manichaei, atque inde ad ecclesiam<br />

reducti, liber.—Videtur scripsisse saeculo quarto. Fabr. Bib. Gr. T. v. p. 290.<br />

" Erat quidem primum cultu Gentilis, deinde ad Manichaeos, in Egyptum<br />

recens delates, se contulit. Tandem ejurata haeresi, ad catholicorum castra<br />

transiit. Cav. Diss, de Scriptor. incertaa .Sltatis.<br />

y Phot, contr. Manich. ubi supra.<br />

^ Beaus. Hist, de Manich. T, i. p. 236.<br />

= Tiilem. T, iv. Les Manicheens, Art. 16. fin.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!