24.06.2013 Views

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VicTORiNus. A. D. 290. 167<br />

which is ;, scribed to Victorinus ; but its genuineness is not<br />

unquestioned. Cave'' says, ' it either is not his, or has been<br />

' greatly interpoUited : for Jerom informs us, that Victorinus<br />

' held the niiilenarian opinion, which the author <strong>of</strong> this work<br />

* dislikes.' 13asnage' rejected this Connnentary. Lanipe''<br />

thought the more probable opinion to be that it is not his.<br />

Du Pin, after having observed the arguments for and against<br />

the genuineness <strong>of</strong> this work, concludes :<br />

' We' cannot there-<br />

* fore be positive that this Commentary is not a work <strong>of</strong><br />

* Victorinus : on the contrary, there is some probability that<br />

* it is his.' Tillemont has" treated this question modestly<br />

and carefully, as usual. He owns thaf there are some reasons<br />

to doubt <strong>of</strong> it : but it seems that there are yet more to<br />

believe it a genuine remain <strong>of</strong> the many <strong>works</strong> <strong>of</strong> this holy<br />

martyr ; only it must be allowed that what he had written<br />

in favour <strong>of</strong> the millenarian opinion has been altered : and<br />

he" <strong>of</strong>fers some reasons for thinking- that what is now found<br />

in this Commentary upon that point is an interpolation, or<br />

addition. That passage is at the end <strong>of</strong> the piece, and it<br />

appears to be <strong>of</strong> a different style from the rest <strong>of</strong> the >vork.<br />

Moreover'! there is some reason to suspect that alterations<br />

have been made in divers ancient writers who held that<br />

opinion : and what may more especially increase the suspicion<br />

here, is, that in this very Commentary there still seem<br />

to be some traces <strong>of</strong> that sentiment; Avhere'^ it is said that<br />

all the saints shall be assembled together in Judea to worship<br />

Christ. Whether it be Victorinus's or not, it is supposed to<br />

have in it divers marks <strong>of</strong> antiquity. Tillemont^ understands<br />

the author to speak <strong>of</strong> the senate <strong>of</strong> Rome, as still employing<br />

its name and authority for persecuting the church. What<br />

he says <strong>of</strong> Nero, that' he is to be raised up to be antichrist,<br />

*<br />

'<br />

Cav. ubi supr.<br />

A Victorino tamen abjudicandum esse existimamiis. Basnag. Ann. 303.<br />

n. xvi. ^ Quod eo minus congruum, cum librum hunc falso<br />

adscribi Victorino Pictaviensi, seu, ut aliis potius videtur, Petabionensi, qui<br />

sub fine seculi tertii floruit, valde sit probabile. Lampe, Proleg. in Joan. I. i. c.<br />

4. n. xii. ' p. 66. Du Pin, Bib. des Aut. Ec. T. i. p. 194.<br />

" Au contraire il y a quelque apparence qu'il est de lui. ibid.<br />

" See St. Victorin de Pettau, Mem. Ec. T. v. P. ii. p. 218, et note 2.<br />

° lb. p. 218. P lb. note ii. p. 444, et 445.<br />

1 See Les Millenaires in Mem. Ec. T. ii. P. ii. p. 251.<br />

•<br />

in Judaea, ubi omnes sancti conventuri sunt, et Dominum suura<br />

adoratiiri. Victorin. ap. Bib. Patr. T. iii. p. 415. D.<br />

* Et vidi, inquit, mulierem ebriam de sanguine sanctorum, decreto senatus<br />

illius consummatae nequitiae, et omnem contra fidei praedicationem etiam latam<br />

indulgentiam ipse dedit decretum in univeisis gentibus. Id. ib. p. 420. H.<br />

' Unum autem de capitibus occisum in morte, et plaga mortis ejus curafcj<br />

est, Neronera dicit. Constat enira, dum insequeretur eum equitatus missus a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!