24.06.2013 Views

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

316 Credibilily <strong>of</strong> the Gospel History.<br />

new sect by that time be was tbirty years <strong>of</strong> age : for more<br />

be could not be, admitting- tbe autbority <strong>of</strong> the Edessen<br />

Cbronicle concerning tbe time <strong>of</strong> bis birtb, as Beausobre<br />

does : nay, be supposetb tbati Mani migbt make a figure in<br />

267.<br />

Toutee observes tbat,"^ since Cyril says in bis time tbere<br />

were persons living wbo bad seen Mani, we cannot reasonably<br />

place tbe dispute witli bim before tbe year 277, at<br />

wbicb time bis beresy was first brougbt into tbe Roman<br />

empire, and in tbe following year be was put to deatb :<br />

wbicb, I tbink, cannot be denied by tbose who bave any<br />

regard for tbe Acts <strong>of</strong> ^ Arcbelaus.<br />

Cave tberefore is somevvbat singular wben he says that*^<br />

Mani began to spread his notions in 277, and" lived to<br />

near the end <strong>of</strong> that century ; and yet be may be thought<br />

to have some reason for that supposition, wben it is recollected<br />

that in Cyril's time there were some who had seen<br />

Mani ; in Epipbanius's, some wbo had conversed with bis<br />

disciple Hermias ; provided tbose authors may be depended<br />

upon.<br />

Pagi approves^ <strong>of</strong> tbe date in Jcrom's Cbronicle, but says<br />

that, according to the success and progress <strong>of</strong> this doctrine<br />

in several places, authors bave spoken differently concerning<br />

tbe time <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

For my own part, I tbink it very dilricult to determine<br />

exactly the time <strong>of</strong> tbe rise <strong>of</strong> Manicbreism in Persia, or <strong>of</strong><br />

its first appearance in tbe Roman empire : and T am apt to<br />

think that most considerate persons may be in suspense here.<br />

It is evident from tbe letter <strong>of</strong> Arius, and tbe testimonies <strong>of</strong><br />

Jerom and Augustine, that Manicboeism was known in tbe<br />

•J J'en ai marqud le tcms a I'annee deux cens soixante sept, en quoi j'ai<br />

suivi Abulpharage, qui temoigne, quelle parilt sous Aurelien. lb. p. 186. in.<br />

Is est annus 277 a Chrisfi nativitatc. Non esse in anteriora tcmpora refrahenduni<br />

Manetis exortum arguniento est id quod Cyrillus subjicit, fuisseadhuc<br />

suo tempore superstites, qui Manetem ipsi suis oculis conspcxissent. Quod<br />

autem sub Probo innotuit Manes, intelligendum de ejus in Mesopotamiam et<br />

Romanoriim iinpenuui adventu, qui uno tantuni anno ejus necem antecessit.<br />

Tout, ad Cyr. Cat. G. p. 99. not. 3.<br />

• Vid. Arch. n. 55. p. 100. ' Haeresin suam disseminare coepit<br />

circa ann. 277. Probi imperatorisanno secundo. H. L. T. i. p. 139, in Manefe.<br />

" Insani* suse virus non ante annum 277 proj^inare coepit Manes, et plures<br />

poatea annos in vivis erat, ac proinde, ad exitum vergente hoc saculo, Agapium<br />

sibi fliscipulum adscivit. Cav. Diss, de Script, incertae act. sub. in.<br />

" In Annalibus origo ha^rcseos Manich«orum anno praecedenti consignatur<br />

scd earn ad praesentem retrahendam esse evincit Eusebius in Chronico. Pagi<br />

Ann. 277. n. vi. Verum est, varias sub idem fero tempus eruptiones monstri<br />

illius fuisse, et insignibus alicujus facinoris notis celebratas. Quae causa fuit,<br />

cur non iisdem Imperatoribus hseresis istius origo raandata fuerit. lb. n. vii.<br />

;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!