The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The M(tnichccs. Sect. I. 273
^vliieli wc have are not complete, or tljat some parts of them
are out of place. It seems to me that some words of' Basnag-e,
to whom Me are indebted for tlie publication of Titus
in Greek, attord oround for such a suspicion, though he lias
taken laudable pains to set all right.
Some ascribe to Titus a Commentary upon St. Luke,
though it is not distinctly mentioned among his works by any
ancient author; learned men therefore are divided in their
sentiments about it. Basnage thinks that' Titus wrote such
a commentary, and tliat there are fragments of it remaining :
Fabricius is of opinion, that the Commentary upon St.
Luke is the work of some other Titus, of the sixth century,
or later : Tillemont, beside other material things, observes
that" no ancient author makes particular mention of any
work of Titus, but that against the Manichees : and that the
Commentary upon St. Luke, which bears his name, has divers
marks of a late age.
I shall add here some censures of learned moderns upon
Titus particularly upon that work of his which we have, and
;
is universally, received as genuine. Those censures may be
of use to assist my readers in forming a right j udgment of
ancient christian writers.
Says" Tillemont :
' He seems to have followed the dan-
' gerous error ascribed to Origen, that the pains of the
' damned, and even those of the dtemons themselves, will not
' be eternal.'
Du PinP says :
* It is surprising that Titus had not re-
' course to original sin for explaining all the flifficulties of
' the Manichees : it might have served him for a general
' solution of almost all their objections : for there is no longer
any difficulty to comprehend, why man is carried to evil,
' why he suffers, why he is subject to hunger, pain, diseases,
' death, when once original sin is admitted : nevertheless he
' has made no use of this doctrine to explain these questions,
'' Quinimo plurima inverse ordine turbata intricatissima invenimus. Prima
fronte periisse librum tertium autumabam.—Sed perlegendo Grseca, apparuit
nobis ille liber tertius integer, quern primo libro inseruerat amanuensis. Deinde
truncatus multis in locis videbatur primus liber. Sed discerpta resarcire, et in
genuinura ordinem restituere conati sumus, non modo argumentorum seriera
secuti, sed etiam proposito Serapionis scopo, quern ipse delineaverat, sequentes.
Basnag. Animadv. ap. Canis. Lect. T. i. p. 58.
' Observandum est igitur, periisse Commentarios Titi in Lucam, sed frag-
menta tantum, sive Catenam Graecorum Patrum sub ejus nomine protrudi.
Basn. ib. p. 57.
editus—non est hujus Titi,
" Commentarius in Lucam sub Titi nomine
sed scriptoris Cyrillo Alexandrino, ac fortasse
saeculo sexto, junioiis, &c. Fabr. Bib. Or. T. 8. p. 413.
"
P
Vid. Tillem. ubi supra, p. 670.
Du Pm, Bibl. des Aut. Ec. T. 2. p.
" Tillem. ubi supr. p. 671.
128. a Amsterdam.
VOL, III. T