24.06.2013 Views

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Metiiodils. a. D. -290. 183<br />

sentiments that were disliked in Orig-en ; and that Methodius<br />

in those more early pieces appeared to be much <strong>of</strong> the<br />

same opinion with Origen : but afterwards he wrote against<br />

him with a good deal <strong>of</strong> bitterness ; <strong>of</strong> his conduct Eusebius<br />

complained. And it has been observed by'' Tillemont, that<br />

in the Banquet <strong>of</strong> the ten Virgins, probably' one <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

books published by our author, there are several sentiments<br />

very near resembling* those called Origen's. Methodius,<br />

says that learned writer, in one place'" very nearly follows<br />

the opinion <strong>of</strong> Origen uj)on the pre-existence <strong>of</strong> souls, A^hich<br />

are at length sent from heaven into bodies. He" seems also<br />

to say, (as Origen Avas accused,) that in the glory <strong>of</strong> heaven<br />

men shall be changed into the nature <strong>of</strong> angels. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

things, not to insist now on any other, are found in that<br />

Banquet.<br />

Upon the whole, as Eusebius was not unacquainted with<br />

Methodius, and has been careful to mention a great nmnber<br />

<strong>of</strong> ecclesiastical writers in his history, his silence about this<br />

bishop may be very probably ascribed to the cause above<br />

mentioned, his displeasure against him for writing- against<br />

Origen, and treating him roughly : that silence must also<br />

be reckoned an argument, that Methodius did never retract<br />

for that would have been much for Origen's honour; it would<br />

have reconciled his admirers to Methodius, and they would<br />

have spoken <strong>of</strong> it frequently, and Eusebius would not have<br />

failed to give him an honourable place in his Ecclesiastical<br />

History.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re" are considerable difficulties about the place <strong>of</strong><br />

which Methodius was bishop. Jerom said above, that he<br />

was at first bishop <strong>of</strong> Olympus. Socrates too says expressly,<br />

and at length, that he? was bishop <strong>of</strong> a city in Lycia, called<br />

Olympus. He^ is now very commonly called bishop <strong>of</strong><br />

Patara, and at other times <strong>of</strong> Tyre. Suidas'^ says, Methodius<br />

was bishop <strong>of</strong> Olympus in Lycia, or <strong>of</strong> Patara, and after-<br />

wards <strong>of</strong> Tyre: in which words there is supposed to be an<br />

for they may mean, that Olympus was sometimes<br />

ambiguity :<br />

called Patara; or, that it is doubtful which <strong>of</strong> those two<br />

•^ As before, p. 138. ' lb. p. 136.<br />

" Ty rtTTO T

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!