24.06.2013 Views

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PiEuius. A. D. 283. 157<br />

It has been observed by several learned men ' <strong>of</strong> late times<br />

that there were copies <strong>of</strong> the Bible, or however <strong>of</strong> some parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> it, called Pierius's, wliich were in great esteem : that<br />

observation is founded upon a passage <strong>of</strong> St. Jorom in his<br />

commentary upon Matt. xxiv. 36; " But <strong>of</strong> that day and<br />

hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels in heaven, but my<br />

Father only." Jerom says, ' tliat'^ in some Latin copies <strong>of</strong><br />

' his time was added, " nor the Son ;" whereas in the Greek<br />

' copies, particularly the copies <strong>of</strong> Origen and Pierius, that<br />

' clause was wanting.'<br />

<strong>The</strong>se things concerning* Pierius I have collected from<br />

Eusebius and Jerom, authors <strong>of</strong> the best credit. Philip<br />

Sidetes^ says, ' that Pierius was catechist at Alexandria after<br />

' Dionysius: the next after him,' he says, ' was <strong>The</strong>ognostus,<br />

' then Serapion, then the great Peter, who suffered martyr-<br />

' dom.' And Photius informs us that'" in his time it was<br />

said that Pierius was president <strong>of</strong> the school <strong>of</strong> that city :<br />

accordingly it is noAv generally taken for granted, by learned<br />

men, that he had some while that charge ; but I think without<br />

good foundation, since it Is no where mentioned by<br />

Eusebius or Jerom : and why they should omit this, when<br />

they so particularly mention his fame for popular discourses,<br />

I cannot tell. Eusebius mentions Pierius and Achillas<br />

together : he expressly says <strong>of</strong> this last that he was catechist;<br />

why did he not say the like <strong>of</strong> Pierius, if true? Philip says<br />

that Pierius was, catechist after Dionysius. When did he<br />

succeed his predecessor in that chair—when he was made<br />

bishop, or after his death ? Dionysius was chosen bishop in<br />

247 or 248, and died in the year 264 or 265. At M'hich <strong>of</strong><br />

those seasons did Pierius take upon him the catechetical<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice? Is either <strong>of</strong> them consistent with what Jerom says <strong>of</strong><br />

Pierius, that he flourished imder Carus and Dioclesian, and<br />

survived the persecution ? Tillemont" is much <strong>of</strong> my mind :<br />

and Cave, though at the beginning- <strong>of</strong> his article <strong>of</strong> Pierius<br />

he roundly calls him master <strong>of</strong> the school at Alexandria,<br />

' Origenis ejusdem, Adaraantii a flagrantibus studiis cog-nominati, ut etiam<br />

Pieiii, doctoris Alexandiini, exemplaria quoque Novi Testament! in magno<br />

pretio habebantur, tamquam omnium purissima. Eorum mentionem reperio<br />

apud Hieronymum ad Matth. xxiv. Hody de Bibl. Text. 1. iv. c. 2. p. 622.<br />

Conf. Mill, ad Matth. loc. et in Prolegom. n. dccxxvii.<br />

^ In quibusdam Latinis codicibus additum est, neque fi/ius : quiim in<br />

Graecis, et maxime Adamantii et Pierii exemplaribus, hoc non habeatiir ad-<br />

scriptum. Sed quia in nonnullis legitur, disserendum videtur. Hieron. in<br />

Matth. p. 118. ' Mfra rarov IIiEpioc, fitTa Hiepiov Qioyvw^og'<br />

K. X. Philip. Sid. " Vid. Phot. Cod. 118, 119.<br />

" Mem. Ecc. T. iv. Saint <strong>The</strong>onas. p. 583. Ed. de Paris. T. iv. P. 3. p.<br />

1225. a Bruxelles.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!