24.06.2013 Views

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lactantius. a. D. 306. 499<br />

porary with Iiini. And they have proposed some very good<br />

observations in favour <strong>of</strong> their opinion. Dr. Pfaff, in his<br />

Preliminary Dissertation to the Epitome <strong>of</strong> Lactantius,''<br />

exj)resses his approbat-ion <strong>of</strong> Nourry's arguments. Le Clerc<br />

too was fully satisfied with' Nourry's reasons. <strong>The</strong> writer<br />

<strong>of</strong> Miscelhuieous Observations upon Autliors, ancient and<br />

modern, published at London, in 1732, says, that'' ' he is<br />

' inclined to agree with those who think, that the autlior <strong>of</strong><br />

' this book is not Lactantius.' Signor Maftei, referring- to<br />

this book, does not quote it as' certainly written by Lactan-<br />

tius. <strong>The</strong> late learned John Davis, who published an edition<br />

<strong>of</strong> our author's Epitome, does'" not positively assert him to<br />

be the writer <strong>of</strong> the book Of the Deaths <strong>of</strong> Persecutors.<br />

<strong>The</strong> same may be observed <strong>of</strong>" Mr. Turretin. However,<br />

such a thing as this is not to be decided by authorities ; nor<br />

do I think the reasons that have been alleged by me to be<br />

conclusive and demonstrative : but they appear to be <strong>of</strong> some<br />

weight ; and therefore 1 choose not to quote this as a work<br />

<strong>of</strong> Lactantius, until I am better satisfied about it.<br />

11. I need not say any thing particularly <strong>of</strong> the poems<br />

de Phosnice, de Pascha, de Passione Domini, which have<br />

been thought by some to belong to our author, and are<br />

joined with his Morks iti most editions. <strong>The</strong>y are not mentioned<br />

by Jerom, and are now generally supposed to have<br />

been without good reason ascribed to Lactantius.<br />

12. <strong>The</strong> editions <strong>of</strong> Lactantius are very numerous. Du<br />

Pin has referred to a good many <strong>of</strong> them : but a more full<br />

and copious catalogue may be seen in " Fabricius: Nourry<br />

likewise has an article'' <strong>of</strong> the editions <strong>of</strong> Lactantius. And<br />

Dr. Heumann has inserted an account <strong>of</strong> them in the preface<br />

to his own edition, formerly mentioned : which appears to me<br />

very valuable for the correctness <strong>of</strong> it, as well as on other<br />

accounts. But I wish that learned man had put out our<br />

author in a quarto volume : he might then have made use <strong>of</strong><br />

a larger letter, and might have added some things, M-hich<br />

are omitted for want <strong>of</strong> room.<br />

" Vid. Pfaff. Diss. n. xii. p. 16.<br />

' marques certaines, comme il me semble, aussi bieu qu' au P. Le<br />

Nourry, que cat ouvrage n'est point de Lactance. Bib. A. et M. T. iii. p. 438.<br />

^ See those Observations, Vol. ii. p. 232.<br />

' e deir altre buona ragione si puo dedurre de Lattanzio, se di lui e il<br />

libro Delle Morte de' Persecutori. Maff. Veron. Illustrat. P. i. p. 149.<br />

Hanc rem fuse monstravit aut noster, aut quisquis est auctor Ubri de Mortibus<br />

Persecutorum, &c. Davis. Annot. in Epit. cap. 53. p. 150.<br />

"^ Lactantius, vel quisquis alius est auctor libri non pridem emissi, de M.<br />

Persecutorum. Turret. Com p. Hist. Ec. p. 29.<br />

" Bib. Lat. V. iii. p. 394, &c. Hamb. 1722.<br />

p Vid. Ap. T. ii. p. 65 l,&c.<br />

2 K 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!