The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

212 Credibility of the Gospel History.
' authority of the martyr ;' whereas it seems to me, that if
there had been extant any such piece of Lucian's, Sozomen
must have known it. Moreover, the Creed, which Sozomen
is supposed to refer to, is at length in "^ Athanasius, ^Hilary,
and '"Socrates: but they none of them call it Lucian's: nor
do they say that it wfis published as his. In one of the five
Dialogues concerning the Holy Trinity, the age of which is
not certainly known, except that they could not be written
much before the end of the fourth century, the Macedonian
asks theOrthodox, if he believed as the blessed Lucian did ?
to which the Orthodox answers, he believes as did all the
martyrs and apostles. The Macedonian asks again, Avhether
or, whether there
he Avould subscribe Lucian's Formulary ;
was in it any thing which he condemned'? the Orthodox then
tells him, that he dislikes" the addition which his friends had
made, and that he could prove it to be an addition of theirs.
There does not then appear to be sufficient reason to consider
that Formulary as Lucian's.
V. This brings us at length to a difficult question, Avhich
cannot well be omitted, relating to Lucian's belief in the
Trinity. We have seen divers testimonies very favourable
to him in Eusebius, Chrysostom, Jerom, Rufinus, Sozomen.
His edition of the Seventy was esteemed by man}^ His
memory was honoured by Constantine and others ; nor is
there in Jerom or Athanasius any censure passed upon his
faith. Who could have thought that there should be any
reason to doubt Avhether Lucian was orthodox ? and yet it
is questioned : for Arius concludes his letter" to Eusebius,
bishop of Nicomedia, calling him Collucianist : the reason
of which seems to be what is said by Epiphanius, that?
Lucian and Eusebius had lived together in Nicomedia : and
Arius I think must have supposed them of ofTO}]Kr]c, rig Trpo(Tt9r]KaTt' Kai tx^ Sii^ai, on irpoetdriKaTt
tvavTia c(VT>}c. Df S. Trin. Dial. iii. ap. Athan. T. ii. p. .507. B. Ed. Bened.
" IIvWhkmvl-^ci, aXi]9o)g Evfftfiu. ap. Epiph. H. 69. p. 7.32. A.
P a/ia AHKiavii) iv 'SiicofirjSeiq. (TVfiftt^iwic