24.06.2013 Views

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

The works of Nathaniel Lardner - The Christian Researcher - Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

496 Credibility <strong>of</strong> the Gospel History.<br />

<strong>The</strong> book, published by Baliize, is ascribed* in the Colbertine<br />

manuscript, the only one <strong>of</strong> it in being', to Lucius<br />

Cecilius. It is not easy to conceive, why the transcriber <strong>of</strong><br />

this book should not have added Firmianus Lactantius, if it<br />

is his. And the forenames, Lucius Coelius, or Coecilius, are<br />

very rarely g-iven to Lactantius. Fabricius* mentions only<br />

one author, Barnardinus de Bustis, <strong>of</strong> the fifteenth century,<br />

and two manuscripts; one <strong>of</strong> the books commonly ascribed<br />

to Lactantius, the other <strong>of</strong> his book, Of the Workmanship<br />

<strong>of</strong> God ; in which Lactantius is called at length Lucius<br />

Coelius, or Crecilius Firmianus Lactantius. Methinks, this"*<br />

is not sufficient g-round for giving- those two names to this<br />

learned ancient; when he is called only Firmianus Lactantius,<br />

or Firmianus, or Lactantius singly, by Jerom, Eucherius,"^<br />

Augustine,''' Apollinaris Sidonius, Honorius <strong>of</strong> Autun,<br />

Trithemius. Not to say any thing' <strong>of</strong> Freculph's and Ado's<br />

Chronicles, though they also use the same way <strong>of</strong> writing-.<br />

And moreover, in almost all the manuscript copies <strong>of</strong> his<br />

<strong>works</strong>, or <strong>of</strong> some part <strong>of</strong> them, (as is owned,) he is called<br />

only Firmianus Lactantius.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n the title <strong>of</strong> the book, published by Baluze, is different<br />

from that <strong>of</strong> Lactantius in Jerom. It is entitled, Of the<br />

Deaths <strong>of</strong> Persecutors : but that mentioned by Jerom is. Of<br />

the Persecution : so likewise in Honorius and Trithemius,<br />

without any variation. This appears to me considerable. If<br />

Lactantius's book had been entitled. Of the Deaths <strong>of</strong> Per-<br />

secutors, it would have been so described by Jerom. If<br />

it had obtained that title, and had been ever so called in a<br />

few ages after, either in manuscripts, or in learned writers<br />

who quoted it ; it is reasonable to suppose that so late writers<br />

as Honorius and Trithemius, one <strong>of</strong> the twelfth, the other <strong>of</strong><br />

" Lucii Caecilii. Incipit liber ad Donatum Confessorem de Mortibus<br />

Persecutorum.<br />

' licet in Sermonibus Bamardini de Bustis nominatus Lucius Caeci-<br />

lius Firmianus, teste Bernardo Moneto. T. 4. Menagiorum, p. 85. Fabr. ubi<br />

supr. in Bib. Ecc. p. 165. Cum denique Lactantium et in Sermonibus Bernard!<br />

ni de Bustis, quos pauIo ante memorabam, et in Codice Colbertino 507,<br />

et Codice Taurinensi libri de Opificio Dei, quern inspexit Pfaffius, Lucium<br />

Coelium Lactantium appellari, non possit negari. Id. ib. p. 166. Conf.<br />

Baluz. Misc. T. ii. p. 352.<br />

" Ausirn et hoc dicere, Firmianum Lactantium Lucii Caecilii nomine nunquam<br />

appellatum fuisse, quod nulla quidem probatione indigere videtur, utpote<br />

nulla antiquioris MS. codicis auctoritate nixum. Pfaff. Diss. Prael. sect. 12.<br />

p. IG. Quid si dixerim, nee Lucium Calium nomen esse ad F. Lactantium<br />

pertinens ; scd a recentioribus solum librariis, nimis saepius, ut par est, sapien-<br />

tibus, additum ? Id. ib. sect. 13. p. 17.<br />

" De Civ. Dei. 1. xviii. c. 23-<br />

" instruit ut Hieronymus, destruitut Lactantius Sidon. lib. iv. Ep. 3.<br />

p. 92.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!