Air Power, Insurgency and the âWar on Terrorâ - Prof. Joel Hayward's ...
Air Power, Insurgency and the âWar on Terrorâ - Prof. Joel Hayward's ...
Air Power, Insurgency and the âWar on Terrorâ - Prof. Joel Hayward's ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Air</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Power</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Insurgency</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “War <strong>on</strong> Terror”<br />
473. US <str<strong>on</strong>g>Air</str<strong>on</strong>g> Force, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Air</str<strong>on</strong>g> Force Doctrine Document 1, “<str<strong>on</strong>g>Air</str<strong>on</strong>g> Force Basic Doctrine,” 17<br />
November 2003, pp. 19-26. For <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> evoluti<strong>on</strong> of USAF basic doctrine, see<br />
appendix 1 of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1984 AFM 1-1.<br />
474. This is a factoid much quoted by USAF leaders, although purists would argue that<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> US Army did not quite have air superiority in New Guinea in early 1944.<br />
475. The c<strong>on</strong>tinuing problems of IEDs – improvised explosive devices – in Iraq has led<br />
to an increased used of airlift so as to avoid <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> truck columns that are favourite<br />
targets of terrorists.<br />
476. Amy Butler, “Holistic Approach: USAF Crafts Plans to Operate its Own Cyberspace<br />
Comm<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>,” Aviati<strong>on</strong> Week & Space Technology, 22 January 2007, p. 46. Eighth <str<strong>on</strong>g>Air</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Force, headquartered at Barksdale AFB in Louisiana, has assumed<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities.<br />
477. Steven T Ross, European Diplomatic History, 1789-1815: France against Europe<br />
(Malabar, FL: Krieger, 1981), chapter 11; Christopher D Hall, British Strategy in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Napole<strong>on</strong>ic War, 1803-15 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992), passim.<br />
478. See <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2006 QDR report <strong>on</strong>line at: http://www.defenselink.mil/qdr/report/<br />
Report20060203.pdf.<br />
479. Norman H Schwarzkopf, It Doesn’t Take a Hero (New York: Bantam, 1992), p. 479.<br />
Horner related this anecdote to me when he visited <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> School of Advanced<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Air</str<strong>on</strong>g>power Studies in 1993.<br />
480. This is articulated in a classic work that still makes valuable reading today for any<br />
military officer: Basil H Liddell Hart, The Way to Win Wars: The Strategy of Indirect<br />
Approach (L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong>: Faber & Faber, 1929).<br />
481. Heinl, p. 17.<br />
482. I owe this idea to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> insightful Australian air <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>orist <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> historian, Alan Stephens.<br />
483. For <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> definitive account of this legislati<strong>on</strong>’s history, see James R Locher III, Victory<br />
<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Potomac: The Goldwater-Nichols Act Unifies <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pentag<strong>on</strong> (College Stati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
Texas A & M University Press, 2004).<br />
294<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Air</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Power</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Insurgency</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “War <strong>on</strong> Terror”