Program - Society of Toxicology
Program - Society of Toxicology
Program - Society of Toxicology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
44 th Annual Meeting<br />
and ToxExpo<br />
<strong>Program</strong> Description<br />
#653 10:45 RISK ASSESSMENT AND SAFETY EVALUATION<br />
OF NANOMATERIALS IN CONSUMER<br />
PRODUCTS. A. B. Santamaria 1 and N. J. Rachman 2 .<br />
1 2 Health Risk, Exponent, Houston, TX and Food and<br />
Chemicals, Exponent, Washington, DC.<br />
Tuesday Morning, March 8<br />
8:30 AM to 11:30 AM<br />
Room RO6<br />
SYMPOSIUM SESSION: NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC TRAFFICKING<br />
IN MECHANISMS OF TOXICITY<br />
Chairperson(s): Walter Watson, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School <strong>of</strong> Public<br />
Health, Baltimore, MD and Richard Pollenz, University <strong>of</strong> South Florida,<br />
Tampa, FL.<br />
Endorsed by:<br />
Mechanisms SS*<br />
Molecular Biology SS<br />
Student Advisory Committee<br />
#659 10:50 TOXICANT-INDUCED NUCLEAR<br />
TRANSLOCATION OF THIOREDOXIN. W. H.<br />
Watson. Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins<br />
Bloomberg School <strong>of</strong> Public Health, Baltimore, MD.<br />
Tuesday Morning, March 8<br />
8:30 AM to 11:30 AM<br />
Room RO3<br />
WORKSHOP SESSION: CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE<br />
CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION<br />
OF IN VITRO ALTERNATIVES TO THE DRAIZE RABBIT EYE TEST<br />
Chairperson(s): William Stokes, National Institute <strong>of</strong> Environmental Health<br />
Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />
Endorsed by:<br />
In Vitro SS*<br />
Regulatory and Safety Evaluation SS<br />
Risk Assessment SS<br />
Student Advisory Committee<br />
TUESDAY<br />
Transport <strong>of</strong> proteins across the nuclear membrane is tightly regulated by the<br />
nuclear pore, a multisubunit complex consisting <strong>of</strong> at least 30 proteins. There<br />
are few known examples <strong>of</strong> toxins or toxicants that act directly at the nuclear<br />
pore to affect transport. However, import or export <strong>of</strong> specific proteins is a key<br />
component <strong>of</strong> cellular responses to a variety <strong>of</strong> toxicants. For example, many<br />
transcription factors are maintained as inactive cytoplasmic pools that can<br />
rapidly translocate to the nucleus upon exposure to toxicants and other stimuli.<br />
Interactions that anchor proteins in either compartment or target proteins to the<br />
nuclear pore may be disrupted (or enhanced) by toxicants or by specific posttranslational<br />
modifications such as phosphorylation or SUMO modification. An<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the factors that control the dynamic localization <strong>of</strong> proteins<br />
across the nuclear membrane is necessary for the definition <strong>of</strong> toxicological<br />
mechanisms and physiological pathways.<br />
#654 8:30 NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC TRAFFICKING IN<br />
MECHANISMS OF TOXICITY. W. H. Watson 1 and<br />
G. H. Perdew 2 . 1 Environmental Health Sciences, Johns<br />
Hopkins Bloomberg School <strong>of</strong> Public Health,<br />
Baltimore, MD and 2 Center for Molecular <strong>Toxicology</strong>,<br />
Penn State University, University Park, PA.<br />
#655 8:30 NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC TRAFFICKING IN<br />
MECHANISMS OF TOXICITY. W. H. Watson.<br />
Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins<br />
Bloomberg School <strong>of</strong> Public Health, Baltimore, MD.<br />
#656 8:35 NUCLEAR PROTEIN TRANSPORT: A ROLE IN<br />
REGULATING CELLULAR RESPONSES TO<br />
STIMULI. A. H. Corbett, M. T. Harreman, T. M. Kline<br />
and A. E. Hodel. Biochemistry, Emory University<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Atlanta, GA. Sponsor: W. Watson.<br />
#657 9:20 SPECIES-DEPENDENT DIFFERENCES IN AH<br />
RECEPTOR NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC<br />
SHUTTLING PROPERTIES. G. Perdew, P.<br />
Ramadoss and B. D. Hollingshead. Center for<br />
Molecular <strong>Toxicology</strong> and Carcinogenesis and<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Science, The Pennsylvania<br />
State University, University Park, PA.<br />
#658 10:05 SUMO MODIFICATION AND REGULATION OF<br />
NUCLEAR TRANSPORT. M. J. Matunis and H.<br />
Zhang. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns<br />
Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Sponsor: W.<br />
Watson.<br />
The Draize rabbit eye test has been used as the standard test method for<br />
assessing ocular irritation and corrosivity potential <strong>of</strong> chemicals and products<br />
for over 60 years. Largely due to the pain and discomfort associated with this<br />
test, there have been extensive efforts to develop and validate alternative test<br />
methods that would partially or fully replace the current regulatory version <strong>of</strong><br />
the Draize rabbit eye test. These efforts are also being driven by the 7th<br />
Amendment to the European Union Cosmetics Directive that will ban the use <strong>of</strong><br />
animals for ocular testing by 2009 and pressure to minimize or avoid animal use<br />
for the European Union Chemicals Policy Initiative (REACH). This workshop<br />
will address scientific and regulatory considerations for developing and validating<br />
in vitro test methods that will refine, reduce, and replace the Draize rabbit<br />
eye test. ICCVAM, NICEATM, and ECVAM have recently initiated collaborations<br />
to assess the usefulness <strong>of</strong> currently available in vitro ocular toxicity<br />
methods and to review the state-<strong>of</strong>-the-science with regard to in vitro test<br />
methods. These efforts include an evaluation <strong>of</strong> several in vitro test methods for<br />
their ability to detect severe ocular irritants, an assessment <strong>of</strong> the performance<br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> the in vivo rabbit eye test, and a review <strong>of</strong> the current status <strong>of</strong><br />
methods for identifying nonirritants and mild to moderate irritants. Current and<br />
future challenges in validating alternative methods and approaches to evaluate<br />
ocular toxicity will be presented including the need for high quality reference<br />
data to assess test method performance.<br />
#660 8:30 CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE<br />
CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT<br />
OF IN VITRO ALTERNATIVES TO THE DRAIZE<br />
RABBIT EYE TEST FOR ASSESSING OCULAR<br />
IRRITANTS. T. Hartung 1 and W. S. Stokes 2 . 1 ECVAM,<br />
Ispra, Italy and 2 NICEATM, NIEHS/NIH/DHHS,<br />
Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />
#661 8:40 CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE<br />
CONSIDERATIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE<br />
METHODS TO REFINE, REDUCE, AND<br />
REPLACE ANIMAL USE FOR OCULAR SAFETY<br />
TESTING. W. S. Stokes. NICEATM,<br />
NIEHS/NIH/DHHS, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />
#662 9:10 THE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF<br />
THE IN VIVO RABBIT EYE TEST. J. H. Haseman 1 ,<br />
N. Y. Choksi 2,3 , C. Inh<strong>of</strong> 2,3 , J. Truax 2,3 , R. R. Tice 2,3 and<br />
W. S. Stokes 3 . 1 Consultant, NIEHS/NIH/DHHS,<br />
Research Triangle Park, NC, 2 ILS, Inc., Research<br />
Triangle Park, NC and 3 NICEATM,<br />
NIEHS/NIH/DHHS, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />
100<br />
SOT’s 44 th Annual Meeting