27.09.2014 Views

Program - Society of Toxicology

Program - Society of Toxicology

Program - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

44 th Annual Meeting<br />

and ToxExpo<br />

<strong>Program</strong> Description<br />

#653 10:45 RISK ASSESSMENT AND SAFETY EVALUATION<br />

OF NANOMATERIALS IN CONSUMER<br />

PRODUCTS. A. B. Santamaria 1 and N. J. Rachman 2 .<br />

1 2 Health Risk, Exponent, Houston, TX and Food and<br />

Chemicals, Exponent, Washington, DC.<br />

Tuesday Morning, March 8<br />

8:30 AM to 11:30 AM<br />

Room RO6<br />

SYMPOSIUM SESSION: NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC TRAFFICKING<br />

IN MECHANISMS OF TOXICITY<br />

Chairperson(s): Walter Watson, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Health, Baltimore, MD and Richard Pollenz, University <strong>of</strong> South Florida,<br />

Tampa, FL.<br />

Endorsed by:<br />

Mechanisms SS*<br />

Molecular Biology SS<br />

Student Advisory Committee<br />

#659 10:50 TOXICANT-INDUCED NUCLEAR<br />

TRANSLOCATION OF THIOREDOXIN. W. H.<br />

Watson. Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins<br />

Bloomberg School <strong>of</strong> Public Health, Baltimore, MD.<br />

Tuesday Morning, March 8<br />

8:30 AM to 11:30 AM<br />

Room RO3<br />

WORKSHOP SESSION: CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE<br />

CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION<br />

OF IN VITRO ALTERNATIVES TO THE DRAIZE RABBIT EYE TEST<br />

Chairperson(s): William Stokes, National Institute <strong>of</strong> Environmental Health<br />

Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />

Endorsed by:<br />

In Vitro SS*<br />

Regulatory and Safety Evaluation SS<br />

Risk Assessment SS<br />

Student Advisory Committee<br />

TUESDAY<br />

Transport <strong>of</strong> proteins across the nuclear membrane is tightly regulated by the<br />

nuclear pore, a multisubunit complex consisting <strong>of</strong> at least 30 proteins. There<br />

are few known examples <strong>of</strong> toxins or toxicants that act directly at the nuclear<br />

pore to affect transport. However, import or export <strong>of</strong> specific proteins is a key<br />

component <strong>of</strong> cellular responses to a variety <strong>of</strong> toxicants. For example, many<br />

transcription factors are maintained as inactive cytoplasmic pools that can<br />

rapidly translocate to the nucleus upon exposure to toxicants and other stimuli.<br />

Interactions that anchor proteins in either compartment or target proteins to the<br />

nuclear pore may be disrupted (or enhanced) by toxicants or by specific posttranslational<br />

modifications such as phosphorylation or SUMO modification. An<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the factors that control the dynamic localization <strong>of</strong> proteins<br />

across the nuclear membrane is necessary for the definition <strong>of</strong> toxicological<br />

mechanisms and physiological pathways.<br />

#654 8:30 NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC TRAFFICKING IN<br />

MECHANISMS OF TOXICITY. W. H. Watson 1 and<br />

G. H. Perdew 2 . 1 Environmental Health Sciences, Johns<br />

Hopkins Bloomberg School <strong>of</strong> Public Health,<br />

Baltimore, MD and 2 Center for Molecular <strong>Toxicology</strong>,<br />

Penn State University, University Park, PA.<br />

#655 8:30 NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC TRAFFICKING IN<br />

MECHANISMS OF TOXICITY. W. H. Watson.<br />

Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins<br />

Bloomberg School <strong>of</strong> Public Health, Baltimore, MD.<br />

#656 8:35 NUCLEAR PROTEIN TRANSPORT: A ROLE IN<br />

REGULATING CELLULAR RESPONSES TO<br />

STIMULI. A. H. Corbett, M. T. Harreman, T. M. Kline<br />

and A. E. Hodel. Biochemistry, Emory University<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Atlanta, GA. Sponsor: W. Watson.<br />

#657 9:20 SPECIES-DEPENDENT DIFFERENCES IN AH<br />

RECEPTOR NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC<br />

SHUTTLING PROPERTIES. G. Perdew, P.<br />

Ramadoss and B. D. Hollingshead. Center for<br />

Molecular <strong>Toxicology</strong> and Carcinogenesis and<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Science, The Pennsylvania<br />

State University, University Park, PA.<br />

#658 10:05 SUMO MODIFICATION AND REGULATION OF<br />

NUCLEAR TRANSPORT. M. J. Matunis and H.<br />

Zhang. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns<br />

Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Sponsor: W.<br />

Watson.<br />

The Draize rabbit eye test has been used as the standard test method for<br />

assessing ocular irritation and corrosivity potential <strong>of</strong> chemicals and products<br />

for over 60 years. Largely due to the pain and discomfort associated with this<br />

test, there have been extensive efforts to develop and validate alternative test<br />

methods that would partially or fully replace the current regulatory version <strong>of</strong><br />

the Draize rabbit eye test. These efforts are also being driven by the 7th<br />

Amendment to the European Union Cosmetics Directive that will ban the use <strong>of</strong><br />

animals for ocular testing by 2009 and pressure to minimize or avoid animal use<br />

for the European Union Chemicals Policy Initiative (REACH). This workshop<br />

will address scientific and regulatory considerations for developing and validating<br />

in vitro test methods that will refine, reduce, and replace the Draize rabbit<br />

eye test. ICCVAM, NICEATM, and ECVAM have recently initiated collaborations<br />

to assess the usefulness <strong>of</strong> currently available in vitro ocular toxicity<br />

methods and to review the state-<strong>of</strong>-the-science with regard to in vitro test<br />

methods. These efforts include an evaluation <strong>of</strong> several in vitro test methods for<br />

their ability to detect severe ocular irritants, an assessment <strong>of</strong> the performance<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> the in vivo rabbit eye test, and a review <strong>of</strong> the current status <strong>of</strong><br />

methods for identifying nonirritants and mild to moderate irritants. Current and<br />

future challenges in validating alternative methods and approaches to evaluate<br />

ocular toxicity will be presented including the need for high quality reference<br />

data to assess test method performance.<br />

#660 8:30 CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE<br />

CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT<br />

OF IN VITRO ALTERNATIVES TO THE DRAIZE<br />

RABBIT EYE TEST FOR ASSESSING OCULAR<br />

IRRITANTS. T. Hartung 1 and W. S. Stokes 2 . 1 ECVAM,<br />

Ispra, Italy and 2 NICEATM, NIEHS/NIH/DHHS,<br />

Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />

#661 8:40 CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE<br />

CONSIDERATIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE<br />

METHODS TO REFINE, REDUCE, AND<br />

REPLACE ANIMAL USE FOR OCULAR SAFETY<br />

TESTING. W. S. Stokes. NICEATM,<br />

NIEHS/NIH/DHHS, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />

#662 9:10 THE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF<br />

THE IN VIVO RABBIT EYE TEST. J. H. Haseman 1 ,<br />

N. Y. Choksi 2,3 , C. Inh<strong>of</strong> 2,3 , J. Truax 2,3 , R. R. Tice 2,3 and<br />

W. S. Stokes 3 . 1 Consultant, NIEHS/NIH/DHHS,<br />

Research Triangle Park, NC, 2 ILS, Inc., Research<br />

Triangle Park, NC and 3 NICEATM,<br />

NIEHS/NIH/DHHS, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />

100<br />

SOT’s 44 th Annual Meeting

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!