27.09.2014 Views

Program - Society of Toxicology

Program - Society of Toxicology

Program - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44 th Annual Meeting<br />

and ToxExpo<br />

<strong>Program</strong> Description<br />

#663 9:40 PERFORMANCE OF BCOP, IRE, ICE, AND HET-<br />

CAM IN DETECTING SUBSTANCES THAT<br />

INDUCE SEVERE IRRITATION AND<br />

IRREVERSIBLE OCULAR DAMAGE. N. Y.<br />

Choksi 1,2 , D. A. Allen 1,2 , C. Inh<strong>of</strong> 1,2 , J. Truax 1,2 , R. R.<br />

Tice 1,2 and W. S. Stokes 2 . 1 ILS, Inc., Research Triangle<br />

Park, NC and 2 NICEATM, NIEHS/NIH/DHHS,<br />

Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />

#664 10:10 THE STATE OF THE SCIENCE ON IN VITRO<br />

TEST METHODS FOR DETECTING MILD TO<br />

MODERATE OCULAR IRRITANTS. C. Eskes, T.<br />

Hartung and V. Zuang. ECVAM, IHCP, European<br />

Commission–DG JRC, Ispra, Varese, Italy. Sponsor: W.<br />

Stokes.<br />

#665 10:40 CHALLENGES IN THE VALIDATION OF<br />

ALTERNATIVE TEST METHODS TO EVALUATE<br />

OCULAR TOXICITY. T. Hartung, C. Eskes and V.<br />

Zuang. European Centre for the Validation <strong>of</strong><br />

Alternative Methods, European Commission DG JRC,<br />

Ispra, Varese, Italy. Sponsor: W. Stokes.<br />

Tuesday Morning, March 8<br />

8:30 AM to 11:30 AM<br />

Room RO4<br />

WORKSHOP SESSION: MODE OF ACTION IN RELEVANCE OF<br />

RODENT LIVER TUMORS TO HUMAN CANCER RISK<br />

Chairperson(s): Yvonne Dragan, National Center for Toxicological Research,<br />

Jefferson, AR and Michael Holsapple, International Life Sciences Institute,<br />

Washington, DC.<br />

Endorsed by:<br />

Carcinogenesis SS*<br />

Regulatory and Safety Evaluation SS<br />

Risk Assessment SS<br />

The recent adoption <strong>of</strong> the IPCS mode <strong>of</strong> action paradigm (Sonich-Mullin et al.,<br />

2001, Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 34:146-152) coupled with the recent ILSI<br />

human relevance framework (Cohen et al., 2003, Crit Rev Toxicol 33:581-589)<br />

have led to an approach for the systematic analysis <strong>of</strong> data on modes <strong>of</strong> carcinogenic<br />

action <strong>of</strong> chemicals in experimental animals and its application to the<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> human cancer risk assessment. Hazard identification and risk<br />

assessment paradigms depend on the presumption <strong>of</strong> similarity <strong>of</strong> rodents to<br />

humans, yet species-specific responses and high dose to low dose extrapolation<br />

plague the development <strong>of</strong> appropriate risk assessments. The first step in a mode<br />

<strong>of</strong> action analysis is to establish the key biochemical and cellular events,<br />

temporal occurrence, and dose response concordance relationships common to<br />

each mode <strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> a chemical. The next step is to assess the biological plausibility<br />

and relevance to human cancer risk <strong>of</strong> the proposed mode(s) <strong>of</strong> action<br />

taking kinetic and dynamic factors into consideration. The identification <strong>of</strong> key<br />

events can be used to bridge species and dose differences. These discussions<br />

will be used to generate a minimal dataset necessary to establish selected modes<br />

<strong>of</strong> action. This mode <strong>of</strong> action framework has been previously applied to rodent<br />

liver tumors associated with exposure to peroxisome proliferators mediated<br />

through the alpha receptor (Klaunig et al., 2003, Crit Rev Toxicol 33:655-780).<br />

More recently, several additional modes <strong>of</strong> action for rodent liver cancer development<br />

have been described including cytotoxicity, P450 induction, hormone<br />

mediated and porphyrogenicity / metal overload. An understanding <strong>of</strong> the mode<br />

<strong>of</strong> action underlying cancer development in the liver will place rodent liver<br />

tumors into a more appropriate perspective when human risk assessment is<br />

performed.<br />

#666 8:30 MODE OF ACTION IN RELEVANCE OF<br />

RODENT LIVER TUMORS TO HUMAN CANCER<br />

RISK. M. P. Holsapple 1 and Y. P. Dragan 2 . 1 HESI,<br />

Washington, DC and 2 NCTR, Jefferson, AR.<br />

#667 8:35 THE PATHOGENESIS OF RODENT<br />

HEPATOCARCINOGENESIS: POTENTIAL<br />

APPLICATIONS TO HUMAN CANCER RISK. H.<br />

C. Pitot. Oncology, McArdle Lab., University <strong>of</strong><br />

Wisconsin, Madison, WI.<br />

#668 9:05 FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING THE HUMAN<br />

RELEVANCE OF CARCINOGENIC MODES OF<br />

ACTION IN ANIMALS. S. M. Cohen. Pathology and<br />

Microbiology, University <strong>of</strong> Nebraska Medical Center,<br />

Omaha, NE.<br />

#669 9:35 MODE OF ACTION AND HUMAN RELEVANCE<br />

OF PHENOBARBITAL-LIKE RODENT LIVER<br />

CARCINOGENS. A. R. Boobis 1 , B. G. Lake 2 , E.<br />

Harpur 3 , J. M. Rice 4 and J. I. Goodman 5 . 1 Experimental<br />

Medicine and <strong>Toxicology</strong>, Imperial College London,<br />

London, United Kingdom, 2 BIBRA International Ltd.,<br />

Carshalton, United Kingdom, 3 San<strong>of</strong>i-Synthelabo,<br />

Malvern, PA, 4 Georgetown University, Washington, DC<br />

and 5 Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.<br />

#670 9:55 MODE OF ACTION AND HUMAN RELEVANCE<br />

OF METAL OVERLOAD AND<br />

PORPHYRINOGENIC COMPOUNDS. J. E.<br />

Klaunig 1 , A. Nyska 2 , J. Popp 3 , A. Smith 4 , W. Stott 5 and<br />

G. Williams 6 . 1 Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN,<br />

2 3 NIEHS/NTP, Research Triangle Park, NC, Purdue<br />

Pharmacology, New York, 4 MRC <strong>Toxicology</strong>,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Leicester, United Kingdom, 5 The Dow<br />

Chemical Company, Midland, MI and 6 New York<br />

Medical College, Valhalla, NY.<br />

#671 10:15 HORMONAL PERTURBATION AS A MODE OF<br />

ACTION FOR RODENT LIVER TUMORS. T.<br />

Pastoor 4 , Y. Dragan 1 , M. Cunningham 3 , I. White 7 , J.<br />

Teeguarden 6 , H. Pitot, III 5 and C. Capen 2 . 1 NCTR,<br />

Jefferson, AR, 2 Ohio State University, Columbus, OH,<br />

3 NIH/National Center for Toxicogenomics, Research<br />

Triangle Park, NC, 4 Syngenta CropScience, Greenboro,<br />

NC, 5 University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin, Madison, WI,<br />

6 ENVIRON Corporation, Collegeville, PA and<br />

7 University <strong>of</strong> Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.<br />

#672 10:35 RODENT HEPATIC TUMORS: CYTOXICITY<br />

MODE OF ACTION. V. L. Dellarco 1 , S. Cohen 2 , D.<br />

Wolf 3 , R. Maronpot 4 and D. Jacobson-Kram 5 . 1 Office <strong>of</strong><br />

Pesticide <strong>Program</strong>s, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC,<br />

2 University <strong>of</strong> Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE,<br />

3 Health and Environmental Effects Research<br />

Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC,<br />

4 NIEHS, National <strong>Toxicology</strong> <strong>Program</strong>, Research<br />

Triangle Park, NC and 5 CDER, U.S. FDA, Rockville,<br />

MD.<br />

TUESDAY<br />

up-to-date information at www.toxicology.org 101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!