Program - Society of Toxicology
Program - Society of Toxicology
Program - Society of Toxicology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
44 th Annual Meeting<br />
and ToxExpo<br />
<strong>Program</strong> Description<br />
#663 9:40 PERFORMANCE OF BCOP, IRE, ICE, AND HET-<br />
CAM IN DETECTING SUBSTANCES THAT<br />
INDUCE SEVERE IRRITATION AND<br />
IRREVERSIBLE OCULAR DAMAGE. N. Y.<br />
Choksi 1,2 , D. A. Allen 1,2 , C. Inh<strong>of</strong> 1,2 , J. Truax 1,2 , R. R.<br />
Tice 1,2 and W. S. Stokes 2 . 1 ILS, Inc., Research Triangle<br />
Park, NC and 2 NICEATM, NIEHS/NIH/DHHS,<br />
Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />
#664 10:10 THE STATE OF THE SCIENCE ON IN VITRO<br />
TEST METHODS FOR DETECTING MILD TO<br />
MODERATE OCULAR IRRITANTS. C. Eskes, T.<br />
Hartung and V. Zuang. ECVAM, IHCP, European<br />
Commission–DG JRC, Ispra, Varese, Italy. Sponsor: W.<br />
Stokes.<br />
#665 10:40 CHALLENGES IN THE VALIDATION OF<br />
ALTERNATIVE TEST METHODS TO EVALUATE<br />
OCULAR TOXICITY. T. Hartung, C. Eskes and V.<br />
Zuang. European Centre for the Validation <strong>of</strong><br />
Alternative Methods, European Commission DG JRC,<br />
Ispra, Varese, Italy. Sponsor: W. Stokes.<br />
Tuesday Morning, March 8<br />
8:30 AM to 11:30 AM<br />
Room RO4<br />
WORKSHOP SESSION: MODE OF ACTION IN RELEVANCE OF<br />
RODENT LIVER TUMORS TO HUMAN CANCER RISK<br />
Chairperson(s): Yvonne Dragan, National Center for Toxicological Research,<br />
Jefferson, AR and Michael Holsapple, International Life Sciences Institute,<br />
Washington, DC.<br />
Endorsed by:<br />
Carcinogenesis SS*<br />
Regulatory and Safety Evaluation SS<br />
Risk Assessment SS<br />
The recent adoption <strong>of</strong> the IPCS mode <strong>of</strong> action paradigm (Sonich-Mullin et al.,<br />
2001, Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 34:146-152) coupled with the recent ILSI<br />
human relevance framework (Cohen et al., 2003, Crit Rev Toxicol 33:581-589)<br />
have led to an approach for the systematic analysis <strong>of</strong> data on modes <strong>of</strong> carcinogenic<br />
action <strong>of</strong> chemicals in experimental animals and its application to the<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> human cancer risk assessment. Hazard identification and risk<br />
assessment paradigms depend on the presumption <strong>of</strong> similarity <strong>of</strong> rodents to<br />
humans, yet species-specific responses and high dose to low dose extrapolation<br />
plague the development <strong>of</strong> appropriate risk assessments. The first step in a mode<br />
<strong>of</strong> action analysis is to establish the key biochemical and cellular events,<br />
temporal occurrence, and dose response concordance relationships common to<br />
each mode <strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> a chemical. The next step is to assess the biological plausibility<br />
and relevance to human cancer risk <strong>of</strong> the proposed mode(s) <strong>of</strong> action<br />
taking kinetic and dynamic factors into consideration. The identification <strong>of</strong> key<br />
events can be used to bridge species and dose differences. These discussions<br />
will be used to generate a minimal dataset necessary to establish selected modes<br />
<strong>of</strong> action. This mode <strong>of</strong> action framework has been previously applied to rodent<br />
liver tumors associated with exposure to peroxisome proliferators mediated<br />
through the alpha receptor (Klaunig et al., 2003, Crit Rev Toxicol 33:655-780).<br />
More recently, several additional modes <strong>of</strong> action for rodent liver cancer development<br />
have been described including cytotoxicity, P450 induction, hormone<br />
mediated and porphyrogenicity / metal overload. An understanding <strong>of</strong> the mode<br />
<strong>of</strong> action underlying cancer development in the liver will place rodent liver<br />
tumors into a more appropriate perspective when human risk assessment is<br />
performed.<br />
#666 8:30 MODE OF ACTION IN RELEVANCE OF<br />
RODENT LIVER TUMORS TO HUMAN CANCER<br />
RISK. M. P. Holsapple 1 and Y. P. Dragan 2 . 1 HESI,<br />
Washington, DC and 2 NCTR, Jefferson, AR.<br />
#667 8:35 THE PATHOGENESIS OF RODENT<br />
HEPATOCARCINOGENESIS: POTENTIAL<br />
APPLICATIONS TO HUMAN CANCER RISK. H.<br />
C. Pitot. Oncology, McArdle Lab., University <strong>of</strong><br />
Wisconsin, Madison, WI.<br />
#668 9:05 FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING THE HUMAN<br />
RELEVANCE OF CARCINOGENIC MODES OF<br />
ACTION IN ANIMALS. S. M. Cohen. Pathology and<br />
Microbiology, University <strong>of</strong> Nebraska Medical Center,<br />
Omaha, NE.<br />
#669 9:35 MODE OF ACTION AND HUMAN RELEVANCE<br />
OF PHENOBARBITAL-LIKE RODENT LIVER<br />
CARCINOGENS. A. R. Boobis 1 , B. G. Lake 2 , E.<br />
Harpur 3 , J. M. Rice 4 and J. I. Goodman 5 . 1 Experimental<br />
Medicine and <strong>Toxicology</strong>, Imperial College London,<br />
London, United Kingdom, 2 BIBRA International Ltd.,<br />
Carshalton, United Kingdom, 3 San<strong>of</strong>i-Synthelabo,<br />
Malvern, PA, 4 Georgetown University, Washington, DC<br />
and 5 Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.<br />
#670 9:55 MODE OF ACTION AND HUMAN RELEVANCE<br />
OF METAL OVERLOAD AND<br />
PORPHYRINOGENIC COMPOUNDS. J. E.<br />
Klaunig 1 , A. Nyska 2 , J. Popp 3 , A. Smith 4 , W. Stott 5 and<br />
G. Williams 6 . 1 Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN,<br />
2 3 NIEHS/NTP, Research Triangle Park, NC, Purdue<br />
Pharmacology, New York, 4 MRC <strong>Toxicology</strong>,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Leicester, United Kingdom, 5 The Dow<br />
Chemical Company, Midland, MI and 6 New York<br />
Medical College, Valhalla, NY.<br />
#671 10:15 HORMONAL PERTURBATION AS A MODE OF<br />
ACTION FOR RODENT LIVER TUMORS. T.<br />
Pastoor 4 , Y. Dragan 1 , M. Cunningham 3 , I. White 7 , J.<br />
Teeguarden 6 , H. Pitot, III 5 and C. Capen 2 . 1 NCTR,<br />
Jefferson, AR, 2 Ohio State University, Columbus, OH,<br />
3 NIH/National Center for Toxicogenomics, Research<br />
Triangle Park, NC, 4 Syngenta CropScience, Greenboro,<br />
NC, 5 University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin, Madison, WI,<br />
6 ENVIRON Corporation, Collegeville, PA and<br />
7 University <strong>of</strong> Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.<br />
#672 10:35 RODENT HEPATIC TUMORS: CYTOXICITY<br />
MODE OF ACTION. V. L. Dellarco 1 , S. Cohen 2 , D.<br />
Wolf 3 , R. Maronpot 4 and D. Jacobson-Kram 5 . 1 Office <strong>of</strong><br />
Pesticide <strong>Program</strong>s, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC,<br />
2 University <strong>of</strong> Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE,<br />
3 Health and Environmental Effects Research<br />
Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC,<br />
4 NIEHS, National <strong>Toxicology</strong> <strong>Program</strong>, Research<br />
Triangle Park, NC and 5 CDER, U.S. FDA, Rockville,<br />
MD.<br />
TUESDAY<br />
up-to-date information at www.toxicology.org 101