Program - Society of Toxicology
Program - Society of Toxicology
Program - Society of Toxicology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
44 th Annual Meeting<br />
and ToxExpo<br />
<strong>Program</strong> Description<br />
MONDAY<br />
Monday Afternoon, March 7<br />
4:30 PM to 6:00 PM<br />
Room RO6<br />
SUNSET SESSION: BROMINATED FLAME RETARDANTS: NEW<br />
FINDINGS<br />
Chairperson(s): Arnold Schecter, University <strong>of</strong> Texas School <strong>of</strong> Public Health,<br />
Dallas, TX and Linda Birnbaum, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />
Endorsed by:<br />
Neurotoxicology SS<br />
Occupational and Public Health SS*<br />
Reproductive and Development SS<br />
Risk Assessment SS<br />
The brominated flame retardants are new potential public health hazards. They<br />
resemble PCBs and are found worldwide. They can be found in carpets, styr<strong>of</strong>oam,<br />
and in household and <strong>of</strong>fice electrical equipment. Brominated flame<br />
retardants (BFRs), especially the common polybrominated diphenyl ethers<br />
(PBDEs) have recently been reported in humans at markedly increasing levels<br />
in blood and milk. The highest levels in humans and food worldwide have been<br />
reported in US samples. Studies <strong>of</strong> milk report 10-100 times higher levels in US<br />
than in European women. US food levels are highest in fish, then meat, and<br />
finally dairy. All human and food samples measured to date are contaminated<br />
with many <strong>of</strong> the 13 commonly reported PBDE congeners, although the<br />
congener pattern can vary in different specimens. Blood and milk levels in the<br />
USA are currently similar. PBDEs cannot be measured in 1973 blood, and are<br />
increasing markedly in humans in the USA (at the same time dioxins and PCBs<br />
are decreasing). No human health studies <strong>of</strong> these compounds have been<br />
published but cell culture and laboratory animal studies suggest certain adverse<br />
health effects, similar to those reported for PCBs which the PBDEs structurally<br />
resemble. New findings will be presented for human tissue levels and food<br />
levels in the USA and worldwide in the general population and in specially<br />
exposed workers. The uncertainty regarding toxicity <strong>of</strong> various congeners will<br />
be reviewed and compared to the dioxin toxic equivalency factor concept. No<br />
such toxicity comparison factors are available for the PBDEs at the present time<br />
making it difficult to decide which congeners should be measured. There is<br />
currently no consensus on which to be measured; this topic will be reviewed and<br />
recommendations made. Temporal trends in human PBDE levels will be<br />
presented and compared with temporal trend for dioxins, dibenz<strong>of</strong>urans and<br />
PCBs. New toxicological findings with respect to pharmacokinetics, neurological,<br />
reproductive and developmental, endocrine, and cancer endpoints will be<br />
presented. Finally, human risk assessment will be considered.<br />
#309 4:30 BROMINATED FLAME RETARDANTS: NEW<br />
FINDINGS. L. Birnbaum 1 and A. J. Schecter. 1 U.S.<br />
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC and 2 Environmental<br />
Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Texas School <strong>of</strong> Public Health,<br />
Dallas, TX.<br />
#310 4:40 PBDES IN US HUMANS, FOOD AND<br />
ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES. A. J. Schecter 1 , O.<br />
Paepke 2 , J. Ryan 3 , L. Birnbaum 4 , D. Staskal 5 and K.<br />
Tung 1 . 1 Environmental Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Texas<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Public Health, Dallas, TX, 2 ERGO<br />
Laboratory, Hamburg, Germany, 3 Health Canada,<br />
Ottawa, ON, Canada, 4 U.S. EPA, Research Triangle<br />
Park, NC and 5 UNC, Chapel Hill, NC.<br />
#311 4:55 TOXICOKINETICS OF BDE 47 IN MICE. D.<br />
Staskal 1 , J. J. Diliberto 2 , M. J. DeVito 2 and L. S.<br />
Birnbaum 2 . 1 UNC Curriculum in <strong>Toxicology</strong>, Research<br />
Triangle Park, NC and 2 ETD, NHEERL, ORD, U.S.<br />
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />
#312 5:10 DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROTOXICITY OF<br />
PBDES IN MICE AND RATS. H. Viberg, A.<br />
Fredriksson and P. Eriksson. Environmental <strong>Toxicology</strong>,<br />
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.<br />
#313 5:25 PBDE LEVELS AMONG US WOMEN, DAILY<br />
INTAKE AND RISK OF HARM TO THE<br />
DEVELOPING BRAIN AND REPRODUCTIVE<br />
ORGANS. T. A. McDonald. Office <strong>of</strong> Environmental<br />
Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental<br />
Protection Agency, Oakland, CA. Sponsor: L. Zeise.<br />
Monday Afternoon, March 7<br />
4:30 PM to 6:00 PM<br />
Room RO8<br />
SUNSET SESSION: DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY<br />
EVALUATIONS: ISSUES WITH INCLUDING NEUROTOXICOLOGY<br />
AND IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY ASSESSMENTS<br />
Chairperson(s): Gregory S. Ladics, DuPont Co., Newark, DE and Leigh Ann<br />
Burns Naas, Pfizer, Inc., San Diego, CA.<br />
Endorsed by:<br />
Immunotoxicology SS*<br />
Neurotoxicology SS<br />
Risk Assessment SS<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fspring following maternal exposures during gestation and<br />
lactation (i.e. reproductive/developmental toxicology [RDT]) has historically<br />
been a routine part <strong>of</strong> the safety assessment process. Recently, increased attention<br />
has focused on the effects <strong>of</strong> agricultural and industrial chemicals, as well<br />
as pharmaceuticals, on the developing nervous and immune systems <strong>of</strong> the fetus<br />
and newborn. This new focus on developmental neurotoxicology (DNT) and<br />
developmental immunotoxicology (DIT) is based on the premise that the developing<br />
nervous and immune systems may be qualitatively and/or quantitatively<br />
more susceptible to chemical perturbation compared to the adult and studies<br />
conducted currently may be insufficient to protect the young. DNT studies have<br />
become common for agricultural chemicals, following the preparation <strong>of</strong> test<br />
guidelines from the U.S. EPA (OPPTS 870.6300, 1998) and OECD (TG 426,<br />
draft). With increased DNT testing and the prospect <strong>of</strong> new DIT test guidelines,<br />
there has been considerable interest in both DNT and DIT, with many scientific<br />
workshops, roundtables, symposia, as well as sponsored research devoted to the<br />
subjects. The intent <strong>of</strong> this session is to highlight and discuss issues that are<br />
common to RDT, DNT, and DIT, including the consequences <strong>of</strong> high dose selection<br />
and maternal toxicity; the adequacy <strong>of</strong> pup exposure during lactation;<br />
whether a different dosing paradigm should be applied to RDT vs. DNT or DIT<br />
studies; whether DIT and DNT endpoints can be incorporated into a single<br />
(RDT) study for hazard identification purposes (e.g., for screening purposes,<br />
what endpoints have proven their value and should be retained). This session<br />
will provide a forum to discuss how assessment <strong>of</strong> RDT, DIT, and DNT could<br />
be integrated for hazard identification purposes and to reduce animal usage.<br />
#314 4:30 DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY<br />
EVALUATIONS: ISSUES WITH INCLUDING<br />
NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND<br />
IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY ASSESSMENTS. G. S.<br />
Ladics 1 and L. Burns-Naas 2 . 1 DuPont Co., Newark, DE<br />
and 2 Pfizer, Inc., San Diego, CA.<br />
94<br />
SOT’s 44 th Annual Meeting