27.09.2014 Views

Program - Society of Toxicology

Program - Society of Toxicology

Program - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

44 th Annual Meeting<br />

and ToxExpo<br />

<strong>Program</strong> Description<br />

MONDAY<br />

Monday Afternoon, March 7<br />

4:30 PM to 6:00 PM<br />

Room RO6<br />

SUNSET SESSION: BROMINATED FLAME RETARDANTS: NEW<br />

FINDINGS<br />

Chairperson(s): Arnold Schecter, University <strong>of</strong> Texas School <strong>of</strong> Public Health,<br />

Dallas, TX and Linda Birnbaum, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />

Endorsed by:<br />

Neurotoxicology SS<br />

Occupational and Public Health SS*<br />

Reproductive and Development SS<br />

Risk Assessment SS<br />

The brominated flame retardants are new potential public health hazards. They<br />

resemble PCBs and are found worldwide. They can be found in carpets, styr<strong>of</strong>oam,<br />

and in household and <strong>of</strong>fice electrical equipment. Brominated flame<br />

retardants (BFRs), especially the common polybrominated diphenyl ethers<br />

(PBDEs) have recently been reported in humans at markedly increasing levels<br />

in blood and milk. The highest levels in humans and food worldwide have been<br />

reported in US samples. Studies <strong>of</strong> milk report 10-100 times higher levels in US<br />

than in European women. US food levels are highest in fish, then meat, and<br />

finally dairy. All human and food samples measured to date are contaminated<br />

with many <strong>of</strong> the 13 commonly reported PBDE congeners, although the<br />

congener pattern can vary in different specimens. Blood and milk levels in the<br />

USA are currently similar. PBDEs cannot be measured in 1973 blood, and are<br />

increasing markedly in humans in the USA (at the same time dioxins and PCBs<br />

are decreasing). No human health studies <strong>of</strong> these compounds have been<br />

published but cell culture and laboratory animal studies suggest certain adverse<br />

health effects, similar to those reported for PCBs which the PBDEs structurally<br />

resemble. New findings will be presented for human tissue levels and food<br />

levels in the USA and worldwide in the general population and in specially<br />

exposed workers. The uncertainty regarding toxicity <strong>of</strong> various congeners will<br />

be reviewed and compared to the dioxin toxic equivalency factor concept. No<br />

such toxicity comparison factors are available for the PBDEs at the present time<br />

making it difficult to decide which congeners should be measured. There is<br />

currently no consensus on which to be measured; this topic will be reviewed and<br />

recommendations made. Temporal trends in human PBDE levels will be<br />

presented and compared with temporal trend for dioxins, dibenz<strong>of</strong>urans and<br />

PCBs. New toxicological findings with respect to pharmacokinetics, neurological,<br />

reproductive and developmental, endocrine, and cancer endpoints will be<br />

presented. Finally, human risk assessment will be considered.<br />

#309 4:30 BROMINATED FLAME RETARDANTS: NEW<br />

FINDINGS. L. Birnbaum 1 and A. J. Schecter. 1 U.S.<br />

EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC and 2 Environmental<br />

Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Texas School <strong>of</strong> Public Health,<br />

Dallas, TX.<br />

#310 4:40 PBDES IN US HUMANS, FOOD AND<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES. A. J. Schecter 1 , O.<br />

Paepke 2 , J. Ryan 3 , L. Birnbaum 4 , D. Staskal 5 and K.<br />

Tung 1 . 1 Environmental Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Texas<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Public Health, Dallas, TX, 2 ERGO<br />

Laboratory, Hamburg, Germany, 3 Health Canada,<br />

Ottawa, ON, Canada, 4 U.S. EPA, Research Triangle<br />

Park, NC and 5 UNC, Chapel Hill, NC.<br />

#311 4:55 TOXICOKINETICS OF BDE 47 IN MICE. D.<br />

Staskal 1 , J. J. Diliberto 2 , M. J. DeVito 2 and L. S.<br />

Birnbaum 2 . 1 UNC Curriculum in <strong>Toxicology</strong>, Research<br />

Triangle Park, NC and 2 ETD, NHEERL, ORD, U.S.<br />

EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />

#312 5:10 DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROTOXICITY OF<br />

PBDES IN MICE AND RATS. H. Viberg, A.<br />

Fredriksson and P. Eriksson. Environmental <strong>Toxicology</strong>,<br />

Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.<br />

#313 5:25 PBDE LEVELS AMONG US WOMEN, DAILY<br />

INTAKE AND RISK OF HARM TO THE<br />

DEVELOPING BRAIN AND REPRODUCTIVE<br />

ORGANS. T. A. McDonald. Office <strong>of</strong> Environmental<br />

Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental<br />

Protection Agency, Oakland, CA. Sponsor: L. Zeise.<br />

Monday Afternoon, March 7<br />

4:30 PM to 6:00 PM<br />

Room RO8<br />

SUNSET SESSION: DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY<br />

EVALUATIONS: ISSUES WITH INCLUDING NEUROTOXICOLOGY<br />

AND IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY ASSESSMENTS<br />

Chairperson(s): Gregory S. Ladics, DuPont Co., Newark, DE and Leigh Ann<br />

Burns Naas, Pfizer, Inc., San Diego, CA.<br />

Endorsed by:<br />

Immunotoxicology SS*<br />

Neurotoxicology SS<br />

Risk Assessment SS<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fspring following maternal exposures during gestation and<br />

lactation (i.e. reproductive/developmental toxicology [RDT]) has historically<br />

been a routine part <strong>of</strong> the safety assessment process. Recently, increased attention<br />

has focused on the effects <strong>of</strong> agricultural and industrial chemicals, as well<br />

as pharmaceuticals, on the developing nervous and immune systems <strong>of</strong> the fetus<br />

and newborn. This new focus on developmental neurotoxicology (DNT) and<br />

developmental immunotoxicology (DIT) is based on the premise that the developing<br />

nervous and immune systems may be qualitatively and/or quantitatively<br />

more susceptible to chemical perturbation compared to the adult and studies<br />

conducted currently may be insufficient to protect the young. DNT studies have<br />

become common for agricultural chemicals, following the preparation <strong>of</strong> test<br />

guidelines from the U.S. EPA (OPPTS 870.6300, 1998) and OECD (TG 426,<br />

draft). With increased DNT testing and the prospect <strong>of</strong> new DIT test guidelines,<br />

there has been considerable interest in both DNT and DIT, with many scientific<br />

workshops, roundtables, symposia, as well as sponsored research devoted to the<br />

subjects. The intent <strong>of</strong> this session is to highlight and discuss issues that are<br />

common to RDT, DNT, and DIT, including the consequences <strong>of</strong> high dose selection<br />

and maternal toxicity; the adequacy <strong>of</strong> pup exposure during lactation;<br />

whether a different dosing paradigm should be applied to RDT vs. DNT or DIT<br />

studies; whether DIT and DNT endpoints can be incorporated into a single<br />

(RDT) study for hazard identification purposes (e.g., for screening purposes,<br />

what endpoints have proven their value and should be retained). This session<br />

will provide a forum to discuss how assessment <strong>of</strong> RDT, DIT, and DNT could<br />

be integrated for hazard identification purposes and to reduce animal usage.<br />

#314 4:30 DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY<br />

EVALUATIONS: ISSUES WITH INCLUDING<br />

NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND<br />

IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY ASSESSMENTS. G. S.<br />

Ladics 1 and L. Burns-Naas 2 . 1 DuPont Co., Newark, DE<br />

and 2 Pfizer, Inc., San Diego, CA.<br />

94<br />

SOT’s 44 th Annual Meeting

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!