27.09.2014 Views

Program - Society of Toxicology

Program - Society of Toxicology

Program - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44 th Annual Meeting<br />

and ToxExpo<br />

<strong>Program</strong> Description<br />

#327 1:30 ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM:<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF EVACUATION, RE-ENTRY<br />

AND RE-USE GUIDELINES FOR CHEMICAL,<br />

BIOLOGICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL AGENTS.<br />

M. A. Maddaloni. U.S. EPA, New York. Sponsor: A.<br />

Jarabek.<br />

#328 1:45 AN EPA PERSPECTIVE ON CHEMICAL<br />

CONTAMINATION CLEAN-UP. S. Sterling, I. P.<br />

Baumel and C. Sonich-Mullin. ORD/NHSRC, U.S.<br />

EPA, Washington, DC. Sponsor: M. Maddaloni.<br />

#329 2:15 A MILITARY APPROACH TO ASSESSING<br />

HEALTH RISK. V. Hauschild and B. Thran.<br />

Directorate <strong>of</strong> Health Risk Management, US Army Ctr<br />

for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine,<br />

Aberdeen Proving Ground, Edgewood Area, MD.<br />

Sponsor: M. Maddaloni.<br />

#330 2:45 BIOTERRORIST THREATS TO THE US FOOD<br />

SUPPLY SYSTEM: A RISK ASSESSMENT<br />

PERSPECTIVE. B. Hope. Air Quality Division,<br />

Oregon Department <strong>of</strong> Environmental Quality, Portland,<br />

OR. Sponsor: A. Jarabeck.<br />

#331 3:15 A PRIMER ON RADIATION ISSUES RELATED<br />

TO NUCLEAR TERRORISM. S. L. Simon.<br />

Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer<br />

Institutes, Bethesda, MD. Sponsor: M. Maddaloni.<br />

#332 3:45 DEVELOPMENT OF OPERATIONAL<br />

GUIDELINES FOR CONSEQUENCE<br />

MANAGEMENT OF RADIOLOGICAL<br />

DISPERSAL DEVICE INCIDENTS. S. Domotor 1 , A.<br />

Wallo 1 , C. YU 2 , D. LePoire 2 and S. Kamboj 2 . 1 US<br />

DOE, Washington, DC and 2 Argonne National<br />

Laboratory, Washington, DC. Sponsor: A. Jarabek.<br />

Monday Afternoon, March 7<br />

1:30 PM to 4:30 PM<br />

Room RO6<br />

WORKSHOP SESSION: HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING<br />

APPROACHES IN GENETIC TOXICOLOGY<br />

Chairperson(s): Jiri Aubrecht, Pfizer, Inc., Groton, CT and Robert Schiestl,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.<br />

Endorsed by:<br />

In Vitro SS*<br />

Risk Assessment SS<br />

Recent progress in combinatorial chemistry, molecular biology, genomics, and<br />

automation has enabled identifying a relatively large number <strong>of</strong> compounds<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> reacting with intended pharmacological targets. However, 40% <strong>of</strong><br />

drug candidates ultimately fail during clinical development due to safety related<br />

issues. The overall attrition <strong>of</strong> drug candidates due to genetic toxicology issues<br />

alone includes about 12% <strong>of</strong> drug candidates. This causes delays in the introduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> vital drugs to patients and significant economic losses. Therefore, the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> relevant mechanism-based high throughput screening technologies<br />

to assess genetic toxicity at the early stages <strong>of</strong> drug discovery with<br />

relatively limited amount <strong>of</strong> chemical is extremely important. Genetic toxicology<br />

provides the necessary information for assessment <strong>of</strong> the genotoxic risk<br />

associated with the use <strong>of</strong> drugs. Since the beginning <strong>of</strong> genotoxicity testing in<br />

the early 1970s, many different test systems have been developed and used.<br />

Since no single test is capable <strong>of</strong> detecting all genotoxic agents, the current standard<br />

in vitro genotoxicity testing consists <strong>of</strong> evaluating mutagenicity (bacterial<br />

reverse mutation assay) and chromosome damage (lymphocyte aberration assay<br />

or mouse lymphoma assay). Unfortunately, these standard in vitro assays are not<br />

amenable to high throughput testing and their application in early phases <strong>of</strong> drug<br />

discovery is not feasible. Therefore, the research and assay development efforts<br />

have been directed to developing alternative approaches, technologies and/or<br />

endpoints. The speakers in this session present emerging state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art technologies<br />

under development and/or currently used in the pharmaceutical<br />

industry. The topics covered in this symposium comprise high throughput<br />

versions <strong>of</strong> the Salmonella assay, assays for DNA deletions, chromosome aberrations,<br />

the comet assay and a gene expression reporter assay. The presentations<br />

will cover exciting developments that may spark further interest in the automation<br />

<strong>of</strong> genotoxicity assays.<br />

#333 1:30 HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING<br />

APPROACHES IN GENETIC TOXICOLOGY. R.<br />

H. Schiestl 2 and J. Aubrecht 1 . 1 Safety Sciences, Pfizer,<br />

Inc., Groton, CT and 2 Departments <strong>of</strong> Pathology and<br />

Environmental Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.<br />

#334 1:40 BIOLUMINESCENT SALMONELLA REVERSE<br />

MUTATION ASSAY: A HIGH THROUGHPUT<br />

APPROACH FOR DETECTION OF<br />

MUTAGENICITY. J. Aubrecht. Safety Sciences,<br />

Pfizer, Inc., Groton, CT.<br />

#335 2:10 BIOLUMINESCENT YEAST DEL ASSAY TO<br />

DETECT CARCINOGENS AND CLASTOGENS. R.<br />

Schiestl 1 and J. Aubrecht 2 . 1 Pathology, UCLA, Los<br />

Angeles, CA and 2 Safety Sciences, Pfizer, Inc., Groton,<br />

CT.<br />

#336 2:40 APPLICATION OF A HIGH THROUGHPUT<br />

COMET ASSAY IN DRUG DISCOVERY. A.<br />

Hartmann 1 and W. Frieauff 2 . 1 Non Clinical Safety,<br />

F.H<strong>of</strong>fmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland and<br />

2 GenSafe / Precinical Safety, Novartis Pharmacology,<br />

Basel, Switzerland. Sponsor: J. Aubrecht.<br />

MONDAY<br />

up-to-date information at www.toxicology.org 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!