Program - Society of Toxicology
Program - Society of Toxicology
Program - Society of Toxicology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
44 th Annual Meeting<br />
and ToxExpo<br />
<strong>Program</strong> Description<br />
TUESDAY<br />
Tuesday Afternoon, March 8<br />
1:30 PM to 4:30 PM<br />
Room RO8<br />
SYMPOSIUM SESSION: UPDATE ON MECHANISMS FOR<br />
ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE-INDUCED HEALTH<br />
EFFECTS<br />
Chairperson(s): Chris A. Pritsos, University <strong>of</strong> Nevada, Reno, NV and Kevin<br />
E. Pinkerton, University <strong>of</strong> California, Davis, Davis, CA.<br />
Endorsed by:<br />
Occupational and Public Health SS<br />
Risk Assessment SS<br />
Epidemiological evidence has demonstrated an association between exposure to<br />
environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and disease. Diseases associated with ETS<br />
exposure include a variety <strong>of</strong> cancers, cardiovascular disease, COPD, asthma<br />
and a number <strong>of</strong> perinatal manifestations, to name a few. While many <strong>of</strong> these<br />
exposure/disease associations are strong, the mechanism(s) by which ETS exposure<br />
influences the etiology <strong>of</strong> these diseases remains unclear. There are a great<br />
number <strong>of</strong> confounding factors which make ascribing any ETS-induced mechanism<br />
for disease difficult. Included amongst these factors is the immense<br />
complexity <strong>of</strong> the substituents which make up ETS. ETS is comprised <strong>of</strong> both a<br />
vapor phase and particulate phase with over 4000 chemicals identified to date.<br />
One must not only consider the effect <strong>of</strong> individual compounds but must also<br />
consider potential synergism between compounds. Another factor which needs<br />
to be considered is the fact that exposure to tobacco smoke compounds is<br />
substantially less than for smokers, due to dilution <strong>of</strong> the smoke. Chemical reactivity<br />
or “aging” <strong>of</strong> the ETS components can also modify their chemical nature.<br />
Also, an individual’s susceptibility to the harmful effects <strong>of</strong> ETS exposure can<br />
be greatly influenced by their genetic makeup. While quite complex, certain<br />
mechanistic themes are beginning to emerge as characteristic <strong>of</strong> ETS’s association<br />
with these diseases. The speakers will provide recent advances in our<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the mechanisms by which ETS can influence the etiology <strong>of</strong><br />
these diseases and provide a linkage between the epidemiological and biochemical/pathophysiological<br />
bases <strong>of</strong> disease. The symposium will have two<br />
presentations each dealing with: ETS and cardiovascular disease, ETS and<br />
cancer and ETS and respiratory diseases.<br />
#1008 1:30 UPDATE ON MECHANISMS FOR<br />
ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE-<br />
INDUCED HEALTH EFFECTS. C. A. Pritsos 1 and<br />
K. E. Pinkerton 2 . 1 Nutrition, University <strong>of</strong> Nevada,<br />
Reno, NV and 2 Center for Health and the Environment,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> California, Davis, CA.<br />
#1009 1:35 IMPACT OF WORKPLACE ETS EXPOSURE ON<br />
RISK FACTORS FOR CORONARY HEART<br />
DISEASE. C. A. Pritsos 1 , G. R. Cutter 2 , S. St. Jeor 3 , J.<br />
A. Ashley 1 , S. Perumean-Chaney 2 , S. Clodfelter 1 , J. E.<br />
Woodrow 1 , A. C. Collier 1 , L. D. Bowen 1 , N. J. Martin 1<br />
and K. L. Pritsos 1 . 1 Nutrition, University <strong>of</strong> Nevada,<br />
Reno, NV, 2 Biostatistics, University <strong>of</strong> Alabama,<br />
Birmingham, Birmingham, AL and 3 Internal Medicine,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Nevada, Reno, NV.<br />
#1010 2:00 IMPACT OF PRENATAL CARDIOVASCULAR<br />
DISEASE RISK FACTOR EXPOSURE ON<br />
MITOCHONDRIAL DAMAGE AND ADULT<br />
HEART DISEASE DEVELOPMENT. S. W.<br />
Ballinger 1 , Z. Yang 1 and A. Penn 2 . 1 Pathology,<br />
University Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL<br />
and 2 Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University,<br />
Baton Rouge, LA.<br />
#1011 2:30 IMMUNOLOGIC DETECTION OF<br />
CARCINOGEN-DNA AND PROTEIN ADDUCTS.<br />
R. M. Santella. Environmental Health Sciences,<br />
Columbia University, New York.<br />
#1012 3:00 ETS IMPACT ON ALLERGIC AIRWAYS<br />
RESPONSES TO ANTIGEN. A. penn 1 , D. Paulsen 2<br />
and D. Horohov 3 . 1 CBS, LSU Vet.Med., Baton Rouge,<br />
LA, 2 PBS, LSU Vet.Med., Baton Rouge, LA and 3 Vet.<br />
Sciences., University <strong>of</strong> KY, Lexington, KY.<br />
#1013 3:30 GESTATIONAL STAGE-SPECIFIC ETS-<br />
INDUCED OXIDATIVE DNA DAMAGE. L. M.<br />
Anderson 1 , A. Maciag 1 , I. Espiritu 2 , A. Bialkowska 1 , K.<br />
Kasprzak 1 and H. Witschi 2 . 1 Lab. Comparative<br />
Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Inst., Frederick, MD<br />
and 2 Center for Health and the Environment, University<br />
<strong>of</strong> California, Davis, CA.<br />
#1014 4:00 EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO<br />
SMOKE ON CYTOKINES AND<br />
NEUROTROPHINS IN THE NEONATAL LUNG.<br />
K. E. Pinkerton, J. P. Joad and M. Yu. Center for Health<br />
and the Environment, University <strong>of</strong> California, Davis,<br />
CA.<br />
Abstract 1015 is located on page 150.<br />
Tuesday Afternoon, March 8<br />
1:30 PM to 4:30 PM<br />
Room 220<br />
WORKSHOP SESSION: CURRENT AND FUTURE SCIENCE-BASED<br />
APPROACHES TO DRUG SAFETY EVALUATION: AN ASSESSMENT<br />
OF POTENTIAL CANCER RISK<br />
Chairperson(s): Martha M. Moore, U.S. FDA, Jefferson, AR and David<br />
Jacobson-Kram, U.S. FDA, Rockville, MD.<br />
Endorsed by:<br />
Carcinogenesis SS*<br />
Regulatory and Safety Evaluation SS<br />
Risk Assessment SS<br />
Student Advisory Committee<br />
Currently the preclinical safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> pharmaceuticals for potential<br />
cancer risk includes the application <strong>of</strong> genetic toxicology assays and the rodent<br />
cancer bioassay. While data from rodent carcinogenicity studies are generally<br />
available prior to marketing approval, data from short-term studies is used to<br />
assess cancer risk during the drug development phases. Although this has generally<br />
been a successful approach there is wide discussion as to the appropriate<br />
role <strong>of</strong> the genetic toxicology assays and the possibility that other assays such as<br />
the Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) test and the shorter term transgenic cancer<br />
bioassays (Trp53 and rasH2) might be useful. The emerging “omics” technologies<br />
provide for possible new and improved approaches to understanding<br />
whether new drugs might cause an increased cancer risk. In addition, both<br />
present and future technologies have the potential to be applied within the<br />
context <strong>of</strong> the clinical trials. This session will provide a forum to discuss these<br />
issues. The first speaker will provide an overview <strong>of</strong> the current approaches and<br />
issues relevant to preclinical drug safety assessment. Additional speakers will<br />
discuss the current thinking on the use <strong>of</strong> genetic toxicology assays, the SHE<br />
assay and the transgenic cancer bioassays. The last two speakers will consider<br />
both the present and potential future applications <strong>of</strong> “omic” technologies and<br />
our ability to utilize individuals in clinical trials to provide a better assessment<br />
<strong>of</strong> the potential human cancer risk from pharmaceutical drugs.<br />
128<br />
SOT’s 44 th Annual Meeting