24.10.2014 Views

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS 127<br />

but they all rely on the idea that a good scale has a high intercorrelation<br />

of the items.<br />

Another commonly used scale type is the Guttman scale, named<br />

after Louis Guttman, another pioneer in attitude measurement.<br />

Guttman’s approach was to devise questions that measured increasing<br />

agreement (or disagreement) with attributes of the attitude<br />

object. In contrast to the Likert model where the total number of<br />

items agreed to without regard to their order is the measure of the<br />

attitude, items in a Guttman scale are ordered such that some items<br />

should be agreed to only by those who are low on the attitude and<br />

others should be agreed to only by those who are high on the attitude<br />

scale.<br />

An example of the difference in approach applied to attitudes<br />

about free speech is presented in abbreviated form in Figure 4.2.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first format is that of the Likert scale. Several items are stated<br />

in propositional form and respondents are asked to indicate the<br />

degree of their agreement or disagreement with the statement. <strong>The</strong><br />

scale score is then determined by giving numerical values to the response<br />

categories and adding up the values given to respondents’<br />

responses.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second format in Figure 4.2 is that of a Guttman scale. Here<br />

the items are presented in an order of increasing commitment (or<br />

opposition) to free speech. Various methods for combining responses<br />

can be used. <strong>The</strong> simplest is to count the number of “yes” and “no”<br />

answers as appropriate. Some decision would have to be made about<br />

the “don’t knows.” One alternative is to leave them out or to treat<br />

them as lying somewhere between the “yes” and “no” responses.<br />

More complex treatments include giving more weight to the less frequent<br />

responses or weighting the less frequent responses according<br />

to some a priori view of the relationship between the content of the<br />

hypothetical speech and the strength of a belief in freedom of expression.<br />

Again we stress that you must make such decisions on the<br />

basis of your research question and your conception of the measurement<br />

model. Guttman scales are somewhat harder to develop and<br />

thus are not so commonly used as Likert scales.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!