24.10.2014 Views

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS 141<br />

“yes” response to the general question (approve of hitting an adult<br />

stranger). In fact, 84 percent of those who disapproved of hitting an<br />

adult stranger in any situation they could imagine went on to indicate<br />

approval in one or more of the five situations presented. <strong>The</strong><br />

“disapprovers in general” averaged about 1.82 approvals for hitting<br />

when specific situations were described. Smith (1981) suggests that<br />

many respondents are not interpreting the general question literally<br />

as asked. Instead they are responding to the absolute phrase “Are<br />

there any situations you can imagine” as if it meant “In general.”<br />

If the attitude object is complex and you start off with a question<br />

to which respondents can answer “yes” or “no,” it is best to<br />

consider following up with the respondents who answer “no” by<br />

asking additional questions that might reveal aspects of the attitude<br />

not revealed by the initial response.<br />

Using <strong>Questions</strong> that Include a Middle Point<br />

We discussed earlier how dichotomous responses can be expanded<br />

by using modifiers (such as “very,” “somewhat,” “a little”) to also<br />

provide a measure of intensity. A question of considerable concern<br />

to opinion researchers is whether one should include a middle alternative<br />

in unipolar questions. That is, should a 4-point scale be used<br />

or a 5-point scale. Including a middle alternative would offer an<br />

indifference point between being for or against a particular view.<br />

<strong>The</strong> common practice in survey research has often been to omit<br />

middle categories explicitly and try to “push” respondents toward<br />

one end or the other of a dimension. <strong>The</strong> reasoning behind this<br />

practice is that very few people are genuinely indifferent or in the<br />

middle. Most who think of themselves as being in the middle are in<br />

fact leaning a little bit toward one or the other end of a continuum<br />

of wholehearted support to wholehearted opposition. It is clear from<br />

empirical work that an explicit middle alternative will often be<br />

taken by respondents in a forced-choice situation if it is offered explicitly.<br />

This suggests that removing the category might be artificially<br />

forcing a person to take a leaning they do not have.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!