24.10.2014 Views

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

208 ASKING QUESTIONS<br />

answers, most respondents will guess and choose an answer somewhat<br />

near the middle. For this reason, Payne (1951) suggested that<br />

the correct answer be put at the top or bottom of the list of alternatives.<br />

Respondents, however, can be misled by this. We believe that<br />

an even better procedure is not to offer alternatives to the respondent<br />

but to make such questions open-ended. <strong>The</strong>re is no difficulty<br />

in coding such responses since the data are numerical and can easily<br />

be processed without additional coding. <strong>The</strong> open question is<br />

more likely to elicit a “don’t know” response than the closed questions,<br />

but respondents who do volunteer an answer or guess will be<br />

indicating knowledge or attitudes that are not distorted by the question<br />

stimulus.<br />

Using Key Informants<br />

Using key informants in social science is widespread in studies of<br />

community power and influence, community decision making and<br />

innovation, collective behavior, and the ecology of local institutions.<br />

Key informants can provide information that is not currently<br />

available from census data or other published sources. Although<br />

key informants are usually better informed than the general public,<br />

they cannot be expected to know everything. Information<br />

informants provide may be distorted by their attitudes or roles in<br />

the community.<br />

As an illustration in a study of what they called “community<br />

informants,” Houston and Sudman (1975) reported that church<br />

informants mentioned a higher number of churches in the neighborhood<br />

than did other informants and the community organization<br />

informants mentioned more community organizations. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

unsurprising results are a function not only of the greater expertise<br />

in their areas of specialization but also of somewhat different perspectives.<br />

Thus, the church informants tended to define a neighborhood’s<br />

boundaries in terms of parish boundaries or of church<br />

attendance patterns, the school informants used school boundaries,<br />

and so on.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!