24.10.2014 Views

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS 143<br />

Less blatant examples may slip by the inexperienced question<br />

formulator. Consider the following question. “Are you in favor of<br />

building more nuclear power plants so that we can have enough<br />

electricity to meet the country’s needs, or are you opposed to more<br />

nuclear power plants even though this would mean less electricity?”<br />

Combined in this one sentence are two questions about two different<br />

attitude objects: nuclear power plants and the supply of electricity.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sentence contains an assumption that nuclear power<br />

plants are the only way to increase the supply of electricity. Making<br />

such an assumption could load a question in favor of one particular<br />

kind of response. For example, if the first part of the question (about<br />

nuclear power plants) had a 50-50 opinion split in the population<br />

and the second part of the question (about having enough electricity)<br />

had a 90-10 opinion split, the conjoining of the two would suggest<br />

greater support for nuclear power plants than actually exists.<br />

<strong>The</strong> size of the effect would depend on the relative strength of<br />

the opinion regarding the first issue. For issues about which opinions<br />

are very strongly held, the effect of the second barrel of the question<br />

might be reduced. Respondents with strongly held opinions might<br />

not pay any attention to the second part of the question. Correspondingly,<br />

the effect probably would be stronger for issues that are<br />

less strongly held or for respondents who hold less strong opinions<br />

on every issue. <strong>Questions</strong> need not be double-barreled in order to<br />

contain bias. Even with highly correlated opinions, many respondents<br />

will not respond the same way to both barrels of a question.<br />

A less obvious version of a double-barreled question is one that<br />

attributes an attitude or a behavior to a well-known person or organization,<br />

such as the President of the United States or the United<br />

States Supreme Court. Even careful professional pollsters occasionally<br />

use such questions in an effort to make the question more specific.<br />

Some might argue that certain issues are so closely related to<br />

individuals or organizations that it is unrealistic to separate them.<br />

We believe, however, that it is usually better to separate issues from<br />

sources, if at all possible. This is especially true for issues that are not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!