24.10.2014 Views

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

152 ASKING QUESTIONS<br />

Checklist of Major Points<br />

1. Use open-ended questions sparingly; they are primarily useful<br />

for developmental work, to explore a topic in depth, and to<br />

obtain quotable material. Closed-ended questions are more<br />

difficult to construct, but they are easier to analyze and<br />

generate less unwanted interviewer and coder variance.<br />

2. Avoid interviewer field coding if at all possible. If necessary,<br />

it is better to have field coding done by the respondent.<br />

3. Start with the end of a scale that is the least socially desirable.<br />

Otherwise, the respondent may choose a socially desirable<br />

answer without hearing or reading the entire set of responses.<br />

4. Do not use verbal rating scales with more than four or five<br />

verbal points. For more detailed scales, use numerical scales.<br />

5. Consider using analogies such as thermometers, ladders, telephone<br />

dials, and clocks for numerical scales with many points.<br />

6. Respondents can rank their preferences for alternatives only<br />

when they can see or remember all alternatives. In telephone<br />

interviews, ranking should be limited to two or three alternatives<br />

at a time. In self-administered and face-to-face interviews<br />

where cards are used, respondents can rank no more than<br />

four or five alternatives. If many alternatives are present,<br />

respondents can rank the three most desirable and the<br />

three least desirable.<br />

7. Rankings can be obtained by a series of paired-comparison<br />

questions. Respondent fatigue, however, limits the number<br />

of alternatives that can be ranked.<br />

8. Rather than having people respond to a list simply by telling<br />

them to “Check as many as apply,” the information will be<br />

much more complete and valuable if each item is individually<br />

responded to with a “yes” or “no,” “applies” or “does not apply,”<br />

“true for me” or ”not true for me,” and the like.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!