24.10.2014 Views

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

Asking Questions - The Definitive Guide To Questionnaire Design ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS 137<br />

might want to know whether respondents are in favor of something<br />

or not, but not whether they are opposed to it. In these instances<br />

you would ask a simple, straightforward question, such as “Do you<br />

favor the flat tax?” Although there is nothing wrong in principle<br />

with asking a question like this with the implied alternative that<br />

the respondent does not support a flat tax, the answer “no” is not so<br />

informative as it might appear on the surface. A “yes” appears to<br />

mean unambiguously that the respondent supports the tax, but a<br />

“no” might mean that the respondent opposes it, or has no opinion<br />

about it, or does not care one way or the other, or has mixed feelings<br />

about it. (When the question is worded “Do you favor the flat<br />

or not?” the level of support may change by a few percentage<br />

points.)<br />

Unipolar items, when rephrased into what appear to be their<br />

opposites, often produce surprising results. A famous study by Rugg<br />

(1941) showed that even such apparently opposite words as “allow”<br />

and “forbid” can produce dissimilar results. Rugg asked matched<br />

samples of respondents the questions “Do you think the United<br />

States should allow public speeches against democracy?” and<br />

“Do you think the United States should forbid public speeches<br />

against democracy?” When the question was one of allowing public<br />

speeches, 21 percent of the respondents supported free speech;<br />

when the question was phrased that the United States should<br />

forbid free speech, 39 percent denied that proposition and supported<br />

free speech.<br />

With this and other studies as a basis, it has become a generally<br />

accepted practice to use both ends of the implied dimension to<br />

phrase simple unipolar questions; for example, “Do you favor or<br />

oppose the flat tax?” Respondents then choose either pro or con<br />

positions or something in between. If an intensity dimension is<br />

added to the question, respondents are asked to choose one or the<br />

other end of the dimension with some gradations in between; for<br />

example, “Do you strongly support, support somewhat, oppose<br />

somewhat, or strongly oppose the flat tax?”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!