15.11.2012 Views

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

elationships among network actors in each country contributes to<br />

a set of contextual distances which represent the differences, in<br />

kind or degree, between the international actors on a set of<br />

influential dimensions: culture, politics, goals and intentions,<br />

organizational factors, ability to form relationships, types and<br />

extent of knowledge, types and extent of resources, physical<br />

location, and available technologies [6, 7]. Variations on these<br />

dimensions form the contextual differences in each country<br />

which, in turn, influence the nature and performance of exchange<br />

processes and interactions and, consequently, products and<br />

performance of TPSKNs [6, 7].<br />

Table 2. Factors related to organizational context<br />

Factor Definition<br />

Goals and<br />

Interests<br />

Trust<br />

Refers to the extent to which participants’<br />

goals and interests are consistent with one<br />

another.<br />

Refers to the degree of confidence or faith in<br />

the intentions and behavior of others (or the<br />

lack of such confidence or faith).<br />

Executive Refers to the extent to which executives and<br />

support and top-level managers from participating<br />

organizational organizations are involved and willing to<br />

commitment commit resources, provide incentives, and<br />

offer direction.<br />

Risks Refers to the extent to which participants<br />

believe their environment, actions, or<br />

relationships threaten something of current<br />

or potential value to their organizations.<br />

Costs Refers to the kind or amount of current or<br />

expected resources and other investments<br />

required of participating organizations.<br />

Benefits Refers to positive results or returns, which<br />

can be financial, societal, political, or<br />

associated with mission performance.<br />

Authority and<br />

hierarchical<br />

structures<br />

Organizational<br />

culture<br />

Leadership<br />

Organizational<br />

rules,<br />

procedures,<br />

and regulation<br />

Resources<br />

Absorptive<br />

Capacity<br />

Refers to formal legal powers, legitimacy,<br />

differences in hierarchical structures, and<br />

formal control over actors and activities.<br />

Refers to commonly accepted and shared<br />

beliefs, values, and practices within the<br />

organization.<br />

Refers to participants’ behavior, such as<br />

taking personal responsibility for actions and<br />

outcomes, providing guidance or direction,<br />

exerting influence, and giving rewards or<br />

punishment.<br />

Refers to the routine, formal policies<br />

defining the ways in which organizations<br />

accomplish their work.<br />

Refers to the extent to which expertise,<br />

funding, infrastructure, staff, technology, or<br />

other suitable organizational assets are made<br />

available.<br />

Refers to the organization’s ability to<br />

identify, assimilate, and exploit knowledge<br />

from the environment.<br />

115<br />

Table 3. Factors related to national context<br />

Factor Definition<br />

Culture<br />

Laws and<br />

policies<br />

Refers to commonly accepted and widely<br />

shared beliefs, values, and practices within a<br />

country.<br />

Refers to formally adopted requirements,<br />

limitations, or obligations which shape and<br />

Political<br />

constrain work practices.<br />

Refers to the support of elected officials and<br />

support<br />

government leaders.<br />

Language Refers to the languages of the participants.<br />

Geographic<br />

location<br />

Refers to geographic or geo-political<br />

locations of the countries involved in the<br />

collaboration.<br />

This study relied on case study methods to identify the factors that<br />

influenced technical, knowledge, and information exchange<br />

during the collaboration between the United States (US) Centers<br />

for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Kingdom of<br />

Saudi Arabia (KSA) Ministry of Health (MoH) that led to the<br />

adoption of the Hajj Mobile Disease Surveillance System (Hajj-<br />

MDSS) in 2009. In the following two sections, A brief discussion<br />

of the Hajj-MDSS case is provided followed by an overview of<br />

the methods.<br />

3. THE HAJJ-MDSS<br />

The Hajj-MDSS initiative is led by the KSA MoH and US CDC.<br />

It allows rapid detection of infectious diseases among Hajj<br />

pilgrims and enhances prevention and control measures through<br />

real-time surveillance information for public health decisionmaking.<br />

The initiative was launched during the period when swine<br />

flu (Pandemic Influenza A, H1N1) had been declared a global<br />

pandemic. The conditions of the Hajj magnified the risks<br />

associated with H1N1. The Hajj is one of the largest, most<br />

culturally and geographically diverse mass gathering events in the<br />

world, attracting more than 2.5 million people of different<br />

nationalities, languages, races, and genders in Makkah. The<br />

guiding vision was to ensure the well-being of Hajj pilgrims and<br />

therefore maintain global public health security. When H1N1 was<br />

declared a global pandemic in June 2009, the Saudi MoH<br />

organized an international workshop of leading global public<br />

health organizations including the World Health Organization<br />

(WHO), the US CDC, and similar institutions in Europe,<br />

Australia, and China. The goals were to pool public health<br />

knowledge about mass gatherings and review the KSA<br />

preparedness plans, focusing on prevention and control of H1N1<br />

[23]. One recommendation was to implement a Mobile Disease<br />

Surveillance System to monitor the epidemiology of swine flu<br />

among Hajj pilgrims.<br />

Immediately following the workshop, the Saudi MoH officially<br />

requested a proposal from the CDC as it has prior experience<br />

using and adopting such technology in many places around the<br />

world. The Request for Proposal (RfP) was followed by extensive<br />

knowledge- and information-exchange through four main phases.<br />

First was the preparation phase, in which participants worked<br />

toward creating a shared understanding and identifying the<br />

responsibilities of each side. In the second phase, a group of<br />

epidemiologists from the US CDC assisted their counterparts at<br />

the Saudi MoH in developing and customizing the electronic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!