icegov2012 proceedings

[3] Coursey, D., & Norris, D.F. (2008). Models of egovernment:
Are they correct? An empirical assessment.
Public Administration Review, 68(3), 523-536.
[4] Ferro, E., & Molinari, F. (2010). Making sense of egovernment
2.0 strategies: “no citizens, no party.” eJournal
of E-Government and E-Democracy, 2(1), 56-68.
[5] Goldfinch, S. (2007). Pessimism, computer failure and
information systems development in the public sector. Public
Administration Review, 67(5): 917-929.
[6] Gordo, B. (2008). Disconnected: A community and
technology needs assessment of the Southeast Los Angeles
Region (SELA). Retrieved from Academia.edu:
http://bit.ly/Al3j51
[7] Green, L. (2001). Technoculture: From alphabet to cybersex.
St. Leonards, N.S.W: Allen & Unwin.
[8] Helbig, N., Gil-Garcia, J.R., & Ferro, E. (2009).
Understanding the complexity of e-government: Implications
from the digital divide literature. Government Information
Quarterly, 26(1), 89-87.
[9] Hilbert, M. (2011). The end justifies the definition: The
manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical
usefulness for policy-making. Telecommunications Policy,
35, 715-736.
[10] ICMA. (2011). Electronic government 2011. Retrieved from
the ICMA website: http://bit.ly/Hrgpok
[11] Kvasny, L. (2006). Cultural (re)production of digital
inequality in a US community technology initiative.
Information, Communication & Society, 9(2), 160-181.
[12] Nabatchi, T. (2012). A manager’s guide to evaluating citizen
participation. Retrieved from the IBM Center for the
Business of Government website: http://bit.ly/At8mkm
[13] Milliard, J. (2008). E-Government measurement for policy
makers. European Journal of e-Practice. Retrieved from
http://www.epractice.eu/files/4.3.pdf
[14] Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C.J., & Stansbury, M. (2003).
Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Washington,
DC: Georgetown University Press.
[15] National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA). (2011). Digital nation: Expanding
515
Internet usage. Retrieved from the NTIA website:
http://1.usa.gov/xOqiUJ
[16] Orlikowski, W.J. (2000). Using technology and constituting
structures: A practice lens for studying technology in
organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404-428.
[17] Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). The duality of technology:
Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations.
Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427.
[18] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD). (2009). Rethinking e-government services: Usercentered
approaches. Retrieved from the OECD website:
http://bit.ly/2XRQ3A
[19] Pena-Lopez, I. (2011). The disempowering goverati: Earistocrats
or the delusion of e-democracy. eJournal of E-
Government and E-Democracy, 3(1), 1-21.
[20] Reddick, C.G. (2005). Citizen interaction with e-government:
From the streets to the servers? Government Information
Quarterly, 22(1), 38-57.
[21] Rowley, J. (2011). E-government stakeholders—Who are
they and what do they want? International Journal of
Information Management, 31(1), 53-62.
[22] Schradie, J. (2011). The digital production gap: The digital
divide and Web 2.0 collide. Poetics, 39(2), 145-168.
[23] Shareef, M.A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y.K.
(2011). E-government adoption model (GAM): Differing
service maturity levels. Government Information Quarterly,
28(1), 17-35.
[24] Van Dijk, J., Peters, O., & Ebbers, W. (2008). Explaining the
acceptance and use of government internet services: A
multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in the Netherlands.
Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, 4084, 269-280.
[25] Verdegem, P., & Verleye, G. (2009). User-centered egovernment
in practice: A comprehensive model for
measuring user satisfaction. Government Information
Quarterly, 26(3), 487-497.
[26] Wang, Yih-Jeou. (2009). Rethinking e-government services:
User-centered approaches. Retrieved from the Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and Development website:
http://bit.ly/2XRQ3A