15.11.2012 Views

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Global perspectives in providing E-Governance services for<br />

development indicate that e-readiness for India is of great concern<br />

and needs improvement in order to enhance its effectiveness.<br />

Most of e-readiness parameters assessed by the INSEAD indicate<br />

that the digital divide continues to exist despite improvements in<br />

many areas including individual readiness. However, analyses of<br />

the survey conducted in the sample eight villages in the district of<br />

Panchmahals in the state of Gujarat suggest that most people<br />

living in rural areas are yet to gain access to such services. Rural<br />

teledensity too is a prime concern in India despite mobile<br />

penetration having gone up. As regards services’ usage in India<br />

vis-à-vis global contexts as per INSEAD, India has not shown an<br />

encouraging performance and has been ranked low in all the areas<br />

including broadband services, bandwidth availability and network<br />

coverage etc. Thus it is important to note that there is a designreality<br />

gap in all the parameters that may be used to assess the role<br />

of E-Governance to support MDGs and sustainable development<br />

in Indian context. It is worth mentioning following statements<br />

that are relevant for Indian E-Governance and its role in<br />

supporting MDGs.<br />

“India lives in Villages”<br />

“ You must be the change you wish to see in the world”<br />

- Mahatma Gandhi<br />

“You have to decide whether development means affluence or<br />

whether development means peace, prosperity and happiness. “<br />

-Sunderlal Bahuguna<br />

“While the distribution of wealth and income need not be equal, it<br />

must be to everyone’s advantage, and at the same time, positions<br />

of authority must be accessible to all.”[27]<br />

It is imperative that MDGs in India need to ensure its<br />

contributions to sustainable development while making efforts to<br />

make quantifiable progress in achieving the goals. Role of E-<br />

Governance services needs to concentrate on bringing in<br />

transparency in government and governance while ensuring<br />

adequate measures in optimizing the costs and time for the<br />

citizens dwelling in the access layer of the governance. In India,<br />

people in this access layer form the core of the development<br />

process and they are poor. These people are still affected by the<br />

digital divides. In absence of an appropriate strategy to enforce<br />

convergence among E-Governance services and with an aim to<br />

empower people in access layer to collaborate, it would be<br />

difficult for India to have sustainable development despite<br />

improvements in MDGs.<br />

4.1 Limitations<br />

This research has several limitations. First, the research has been<br />

limited to a homogeneous sample of respondents in a particular<br />

district which does away with the scope for generalization. A<br />

larger number of samples need to be included covering diverge<br />

demographic areas with heterogeneity. Secondly, E-Governance<br />

services considered for the study are limited to government webaccess<br />

alone. Other sources like civil society and business<br />

organizations providing such services need to be included in order<br />

to make the analyses broad-based. Thirdly, User Centered Designs<br />

(UCD) are quite relevant in such studies to assess Quality of<br />

Services (QoS), cost and latency. These could not be assessed as<br />

most of these services are yet to be availed by the sample<br />

respondents. There is scope to include these dimensions while<br />

362<br />

validating the model (especially in capturing information needs of<br />

uses and their intentions to use E-Governance services).<br />

5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The author acknowledges the support of the SDTT, Panchmahals<br />

District Collectorate and Panchmahals District Milk Cooperative<br />

Union for the successful conduct of the study.<br />

6. REFERENCES<br />

[1] Aisha Ghaus-Pasha, 2007, Governance for The Millennium<br />

Development Goals, International Journal of Information<br />

Technology and Knowledge Management, Volume 4, No. 1,<br />

pp. 119-124<br />

[2] Dutta, Soumitra, and Mia, Irene, 2011, The Global<br />

Information Technology Report, 2010-2011, INSEAD,<br />

World Economic Forum, Geneva.<br />

[3] European Union (EU),2007, “Inclusive e-Government:<br />

Survey of status and baseline activities”, European<br />

Commission, DG Information Society and Media, e-<br />

Government unit, December<br />

[4] Gilhooly, Denis, 2004, Mainstreaming Information &<br />

Communication Technologies for the Achievement of the<br />

Millennium Development Goals, Report UN ICT Task<br />

Force, Berlin, 18-20 November.<br />

[5] Government of Gujarat,2011, Gujarat Informatics Limited,<br />

Enabling e-Governance. url: www.gujaratinformatics.com.<br />

Accessed on 15.07.2011.<br />

[6] Government of India, 2007, Country Strategy Paper, 2007-<br />

2013, Planning Commission, New Delhi.<br />

[7] Government of India,2011, Agmarknet, A Step towards<br />

Globalization of Indian Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture,<br />

New Delhi. url: www.agmarknet.nic.in accessed on<br />

15.07.2011.<br />

[8] Government of India,2011, National Informatics Center. url:<br />

ww.nic.in accessed on 15.07.2011<br />

[9] Government of India,2011, Saaransh, A Compendium of<br />

Mission Mode Projects under NeGP, Ministry of IT, New<br />

Delhi. url: http://www.mit.gov.in/content/mission-modeprojects<br />

accessed on 17.07.2011;<br />

http://www.mit.gov.in/sites/upload_files/dit/files/Compendiu<br />

m_FINAL_Version_220211.pdf accessed on. 14. 07.2011.<br />

[10] Heeks, R. and A. Molla,2009, “Impact Assessment of ICTfor-Development<br />

Projects: A Compendium of Approaches”,<br />

Working Paper 36, Institute for Development, Policy and<br />

Management (IDPM), University of Manchester.<br />

[11] IBRD, 2011, Improving the Odds of Achieving the MDGs<br />

Heterogeneity, Gaps, and Challenges, Global Monitoring<br />

Report, 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433<br />

[12] IISD, 1997, Assessing Sustainable Development, Principles<br />

in Practice, The International Institute for Sustainable<br />

Development, December, ISBN 1-895536-07-3<br />

[13] India Statistics , 2011, Revealing India Statically. url:<br />

www.indiastat.com. accessed on 14.07.2011.<br />

[14] International Telecommunication Union (ITU), 2010, World<br />

Telecommunication/ICT Development Report 2010,<br />

Monitoring the WSIS Target: A Mid Term Review, Geneva,<br />

Switzerland.<br />

[15] International Telecommunication Union, 2010. World<br />

Telecommunication/ICT Development Report 2010,<br />

Monitoring the WSIS Target: A Mid Term Review, Geneva,<br />

Switzerland.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!