icegov2012 proceedings
icegov2012 proceedings
icegov2012 proceedings
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6. DISCUSSION<br />
This study expands the concepts and understanding of the factors<br />
related to the three predefined layers of contexts, knowledge and<br />
information content, organizational, and national contexts.<br />
Related to the knowledge and information layer of context, the<br />
case study revealed four factors: codifiability; perceptions of the<br />
content’s value; sensitivity; and, confidentiality. The study<br />
pointed to new ways in which the perceptions of a specific<br />
content’s sensitivity and confidentiality might influence exchange<br />
activities in TPSKNs. As revealed in the case study, the<br />
perception by Saudi participants of the system’s data as being<br />
sensitive did not influence their intention to exchange that data<br />
with their CDC counterparts, although said perception did<br />
influence their intention and desire to have full control over that<br />
data. The same phenomenon can be seen with regards to<br />
confidentiality, in that Saudi perceptions of confidential data—or<br />
data which should be seen as being confidential—did not prevent<br />
the CDC team from accessing the data required to conduct their<br />
work, although it did restrict their means of access to that data.<br />
The case study expands the concepts and understanding of the<br />
factors related to the organizational layer of context as well. These<br />
factors include: goals and interests; trust and past relationships;<br />
executive support; authority and hierarchical structures;<br />
leadership; resources; skills; capabilities; commitment;<br />
organizational culture; and, perceived risk. This research<br />
identified the perceptions of partner’s values as one of those<br />
additional organizational level factors which motivated<br />
collaboration in TPSKNs. Also, the case study discusses the ways<br />
in which the identified factors influenced exchange activities<br />
during the collaboration toward adopting the Hajj-MDSS.<br />
As with regard to the national layer of context, the study discussed<br />
five factors. These factors include: political support; political<br />
relations; national events; national law; and, national language.<br />
The case provided empirical evidence for the influence of these<br />
identified factors and expanded the understanding on the ways in<br />
which they may influence the effectiveness of TPSKNs. For<br />
instance, the case study found that the intention to collaborate<br />
with another country that needs assistance toward addressing<br />
global issues and concerns may not be influenced by relation at<br />
political level while the strong relations at political level still<br />
proved to be significant for ensuring better outcomes. Also, the<br />
influence of national language found to be evident even when all<br />
participants from both sides are fluent and able to speak the same<br />
language.<br />
As the case study was centered on adopting an existing system to<br />
suit a new context, It expands upon the considered contexts to<br />
include a technological context, central when collaboration<br />
centers on implementing a new system or adopting an existing<br />
system. Five distinct factors related to the technological context<br />
were evident in this case. Ease of use, compatibility with other<br />
systems, ICT infrastructures, the ability to meet technical<br />
requirements, and the additional system features, such as culturalrelated<br />
dimensions—e.g. software capable of supporting different<br />
languages and calendars— were identified as additional factors<br />
influencing exchange activities in TPSKNs. Figure 2 depicts the<br />
factors influencing exchange activities in TPSKNs, discussed<br />
above and informed by the collaboration between the MoH and<br />
CDC aimed at implementing the Hajj-MDSS during the 2009<br />
Hajj.<br />
121<br />
Figure 2. Factors Influenced Sharing and Exchange<br />
Activities during the Adoption of the Hajj-MDSS<br />
7. LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE WORK<br />
The research design and methods used by this study have<br />
employed several measures meant to ensure the reliability and<br />
validity of the research and its conclusions. As with any research<br />
endeavor, however, this study is limited in certain respects. One<br />
of the main limitations stems from the low matching level<br />
between those participants representing the Saudi MoH and those<br />
representing the US CDC available to be interviewed as part of<br />
this research. The study faced specific challenges in this regard, as<br />
some CDC participants were unavailable to be interviewed due to<br />
their responsibilities in other countries. Furthermore, Saudi<br />
participants were representative of multiple organizational levels,<br />
from the technical level up to the ministerial level. Such was not<br />
the case, however, with the three CDC participants available and<br />
amenable to being interviewed. Participants from the CDC were,<br />
in fact, representative of essentially the same organizational level,<br />
despite the fact that one such participant had acted as a team<br />
leader throughout the collaborative process. The collected data<br />
would certainly be richer had participants from CDC representing<br />
different organizational levels. Finally, since data collection relied<br />
mainly on semi-structured, face-to-face interviews, bias may have<br />
occurred due to the time lag between the timing of data collection<br />
and the end of the project, the differences between the stated and<br />
actual behavior of the participants, the sensitivity of the questions,<br />
and incomplete or inaccurate recall on the part of interviewees.<br />
Future publications will present the remaining findings of the<br />
study and discuss the extended version of the Dynamic Model of<br />
Transnational Knowledge Networks (DMTKNs) that has been<br />
developed based on the presented findings.<br />
8. REFERENCES<br />
[1] Gharawi, M. and Dawes, S. Conceptualizing knowledge and<br />
information sharing in transnational knowledge networks. In<br />
4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of<br />
Electronic Governance. 2010. Beijing, China.<br />
[2] Slaughter, A. A New World Order. Princeton University<br />
Press, Princeton: New Jersey, 2004.<br />
[3] Betsill, M., and Bulkeley, H. Transnational networks and<br />
global environmental governance: The cities for climate<br />
protection program. International Studies Quarterly.,<br />
48(2004), 417- 493.<br />
[4] Raustiala, K. The architecture of international cooperation:<br />
Transgovernmental networks and the future of international