15.11.2012 Views

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6. DISCUSSION<br />

This study expands the concepts and understanding of the factors<br />

related to the three predefined layers of contexts, knowledge and<br />

information content, organizational, and national contexts.<br />

Related to the knowledge and information layer of context, the<br />

case study revealed four factors: codifiability; perceptions of the<br />

content’s value; sensitivity; and, confidentiality. The study<br />

pointed to new ways in which the perceptions of a specific<br />

content’s sensitivity and confidentiality might influence exchange<br />

activities in TPSKNs. As revealed in the case study, the<br />

perception by Saudi participants of the system’s data as being<br />

sensitive did not influence their intention to exchange that data<br />

with their CDC counterparts, although said perception did<br />

influence their intention and desire to have full control over that<br />

data. The same phenomenon can be seen with regards to<br />

confidentiality, in that Saudi perceptions of confidential data—or<br />

data which should be seen as being confidential—did not prevent<br />

the CDC team from accessing the data required to conduct their<br />

work, although it did restrict their means of access to that data.<br />

The case study expands the concepts and understanding of the<br />

factors related to the organizational layer of context as well. These<br />

factors include: goals and interests; trust and past relationships;<br />

executive support; authority and hierarchical structures;<br />

leadership; resources; skills; capabilities; commitment;<br />

organizational culture; and, perceived risk. This research<br />

identified the perceptions of partner’s values as one of those<br />

additional organizational level factors which motivated<br />

collaboration in TPSKNs. Also, the case study discusses the ways<br />

in which the identified factors influenced exchange activities<br />

during the collaboration toward adopting the Hajj-MDSS.<br />

As with regard to the national layer of context, the study discussed<br />

five factors. These factors include: political support; political<br />

relations; national events; national law; and, national language.<br />

The case provided empirical evidence for the influence of these<br />

identified factors and expanded the understanding on the ways in<br />

which they may influence the effectiveness of TPSKNs. For<br />

instance, the case study found that the intention to collaborate<br />

with another country that needs assistance toward addressing<br />

global issues and concerns may not be influenced by relation at<br />

political level while the strong relations at political level still<br />

proved to be significant for ensuring better outcomes. Also, the<br />

influence of national language found to be evident even when all<br />

participants from both sides are fluent and able to speak the same<br />

language.<br />

As the case study was centered on adopting an existing system to<br />

suit a new context, It expands upon the considered contexts to<br />

include a technological context, central when collaboration<br />

centers on implementing a new system or adopting an existing<br />

system. Five distinct factors related to the technological context<br />

were evident in this case. Ease of use, compatibility with other<br />

systems, ICT infrastructures, the ability to meet technical<br />

requirements, and the additional system features, such as culturalrelated<br />

dimensions—e.g. software capable of supporting different<br />

languages and calendars— were identified as additional factors<br />

influencing exchange activities in TPSKNs. Figure 2 depicts the<br />

factors influencing exchange activities in TPSKNs, discussed<br />

above and informed by the collaboration between the MoH and<br />

CDC aimed at implementing the Hajj-MDSS during the 2009<br />

Hajj.<br />

121<br />

Figure 2. Factors Influenced Sharing and Exchange<br />

Activities during the Adoption of the Hajj-MDSS<br />

7. LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE WORK<br />

The research design and methods used by this study have<br />

employed several measures meant to ensure the reliability and<br />

validity of the research and its conclusions. As with any research<br />

endeavor, however, this study is limited in certain respects. One<br />

of the main limitations stems from the low matching level<br />

between those participants representing the Saudi MoH and those<br />

representing the US CDC available to be interviewed as part of<br />

this research. The study faced specific challenges in this regard, as<br />

some CDC participants were unavailable to be interviewed due to<br />

their responsibilities in other countries. Furthermore, Saudi<br />

participants were representative of multiple organizational levels,<br />

from the technical level up to the ministerial level. Such was not<br />

the case, however, with the three CDC participants available and<br />

amenable to being interviewed. Participants from the CDC were,<br />

in fact, representative of essentially the same organizational level,<br />

despite the fact that one such participant had acted as a team<br />

leader throughout the collaborative process. The collected data<br />

would certainly be richer had participants from CDC representing<br />

different organizational levels. Finally, since data collection relied<br />

mainly on semi-structured, face-to-face interviews, bias may have<br />

occurred due to the time lag between the timing of data collection<br />

and the end of the project, the differences between the stated and<br />

actual behavior of the participants, the sensitivity of the questions,<br />

and incomplete or inaccurate recall on the part of interviewees.<br />

Future publications will present the remaining findings of the<br />

study and discuss the extended version of the Dynamic Model of<br />

Transnational Knowledge Networks (DMTKNs) that has been<br />

developed based on the presented findings.<br />

8. REFERENCES<br />

[1] Gharawi, M. and Dawes, S. Conceptualizing knowledge and<br />

information sharing in transnational knowledge networks. In<br />

4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of<br />

Electronic Governance. 2010. Beijing, China.<br />

[2] Slaughter, A. A New World Order. Princeton University<br />

Press, Princeton: New Jersey, 2004.<br />

[3] Betsill, M., and Bulkeley, H. Transnational networks and<br />

global environmental governance: The cities for climate<br />

protection program. International Studies Quarterly.,<br />

48(2004), 417- 493.<br />

[4] Raustiala, K. The architecture of international cooperation:<br />

Transgovernmental networks and the future of international

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!