15.11.2012 Views

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

integrating them worth it? Because a lack of measurement to<br />

performance (see below), we don’t know. But what we do know is<br />

that one of the biggest trends in e-government will be the move<br />

away from specific websites to search. Indeed, already in 2010<br />

only a small minority of UK users came in through the direct.gov<br />

portal (12%) with the majority arriving at their service of choice<br />

from search (52%) or via an external link (43%). 11 A constituent<br />

will no longer go to a central government portal to look for<br />

something but rather use Google, or another search engine, to<br />

simply search for the service or information desired.<br />

The current common approach is in effect not a measure of<br />

‘supply’ as a feature may exist in theory but if it is not found on<br />

websites then it is not counted. Adding searching for a service<br />

anywhere in a country’s e-government ecosystem to the arsenal of<br />

locating items from a supply-side perspective is an obvious<br />

addition considering the often meager usage numbers of portals<br />

and the high usage numbers for search engines. An updated<br />

survey should thus also cover assessments of search relevance.<br />

6.5 Link Survey to Performance<br />

Linking e-government performance as measured by the supplyside<br />

efforts to outcome, i.e. performance, is increasingly<br />

important. To date, however, such efforts have been minimal due<br />

to the difficulty in execution at all levels.<br />

“Just as there is tremendous complexity in public performance<br />

measurement in general, so too are there substantial definitional<br />

and methodological challenges in monitoring and evaluating the<br />

efficiency and effectiveness of public service delivery through<br />

online media,” says the UN 2010 report. But desk research can<br />

supplement online supply-side efforts in linking a survey to<br />

performance, a key measure of e-government. For example, a<br />

2009 book chapter used traditional supply-side analysis of the 239<br />

largest U.S. cities correlated with U.S. Census data to show that<br />

large cities, on average, have better e-government than small ones,<br />

likely an effect of the fact that there is often a fixed cost of system<br />

implementation, which decreases cost per user. [27] Qualitative<br />

analysis can also be linked to quantitative estimates using web<br />

analytics (see section 5.2.1) which, although biased and<br />

incomplete, tend to be consistently so thereby enabling relatively<br />

good country and longitudinal comparisons.<br />

In this way, it is possible to begin to answer the most fundamental<br />

of questions: is the money being spent on e-government worth it?<br />

Which organizations are spending the appropriate amounts? Are<br />

there organizations that spend less but achieve more? This<br />

exercise will entail asking those surveyed for their e-government<br />

budgets, usage statistics, satisfactions surveys, and data on cyber<br />

security, among others (also see section 6.2). If organizations do<br />

not provide such information, then their e-government website<br />

can be evaluated to see whether they do. Or search can be used to<br />

see whether any such data are available. If all else fails, so should<br />

the organization in this area: if money is being spent on egovernment<br />

but the results are not transparent or the benefits not<br />

being measured, why do it in the first place?<br />

6.6 Measurement at All Levels<br />

The UN survey fulfills an important international role in<br />

benchmarking the supply of e-government services across<br />

11 http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/news/digital-default-proposed-<br />

government-services<br />

438<br />

countries. But there is also great demand for e-government<br />

measurement surveys at all levels. This paper has outlined recent<br />

e-government, technology and benchmarking trends, and<br />

proposed a revised measurement framework to meet the demand<br />

at all levels.<br />

All politics is local as Tip O’Neill, the former speaker of the U.S.<br />

House of Representatives, used to say. Indeed, many public sector<br />

services are offered at the local level, which means that egovernment<br />

too needs to offer them locally. However, many local<br />

services are also increasingly integrated into national level<br />

websites – again, the user should not need to know who is<br />

offering them or at what level, but rather just how to find them.<br />

For example, South Korea’s national portal includes links to both<br />

national and local government services. 12 The Canadian national<br />

portal goes one step further and provides a ‘close to your home’<br />

feature through which one can locate services by postal code, city<br />

or province/territory. 13 The Australian national portal, meanwhile,<br />

offers an advanced search feature that filters results by, among<br />

others, local government services. 14 Australia’s portal also<br />

explains how constituents can file a complaint through a number<br />

of channels, including via email, fax, post or – in the most<br />

traditional way – by hand. 15<br />

Every case will be slightly different depending on the scope,<br />

specific measurement objectives and intended level of<br />

sophistication, all equations of time, money and effort. However,<br />

the basic approach will remain the same: to use a robust supplyside<br />

approach, which is customized for cultural and local needs<br />

and takes into account emerging trends in order to support the<br />

larger endeavor of linking survey performance to government<br />

performance.<br />

7. CONCLUSION<br />

As illustrated through the UN survey, supply side analysis<br />

remains a useful way of comparing relative development in the<br />

digital era. However, to fully capture the modern complexities of<br />

e-government across various levels, a revised framework is<br />

necessary, one that is sustainable into the future by having<br />

government supply the data for verification, providing policymakers<br />

with near real-time data, while supplementing the<br />

traditional efforts with additional automation and search. In this<br />

effort, additional improvements can be made in regards to adding<br />

measures of transparency, usage, security, and performance.<br />

E-government must be achieved through sustainable development,<br />

illustrating how investment is connected to outcome and how it is<br />

reflective, and supports an organization’s broader development<br />

goals. The UN approach is a good framework to start from. When<br />

we customize it, we can support the goal of linking the survey to<br />

performance.<br />

12<br />

http://www.korea.go.kr/new_eng/main/index.do<br />

13<br />

http://www.servicecanada.gc.ca/cgi-bin/hrsearch.cgi?app=hme&ln=eng<br />

14<br />

Select “search” and then “advanced search” on the portal to try:<br />

http://australia.gov.au<br />

15<br />

http://australia.gov.au/service/privacy-complaint-to-the-officeof-the-australian-information-commissioner

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!