15.11.2012 Views

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Information Sharing in Inter-departmental Collaboration: A<br />

Conceptual Framework for Local Government Authorities<br />

Alinaghi Ziaee Bigdeli<br />

Brunel University<br />

Kingston Lane, UB8 3PH<br />

Uxbridge, United Kingdom<br />

cspgaaz@brunel.ac.uk<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This research attempts to develop a socio-technical framework for<br />

Inter-departmental Electronic Information Sharing (EIS) in Local<br />

Government Authorities (LGAs).<br />

Categories and Subject Descriptors<br />

H.0 INFORMATION SYSTEMS GENERAL<br />

General Terms<br />

Management, Security, Human Factors, Standardization<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Decision-making over adopting Inter-Organisational Information<br />

Systems (IOIS) that facilitate information sharing in an electronic<br />

manner has become in the centre of attention of researchers and<br />

practitioners in the field of information systems. It can be argued<br />

that a conceptual framework that examines EIS in LGAs is very<br />

limited. Several drawbacks can be identified regarding the<br />

existing frameworks as they: (1) mainly focus on either<br />

organisational or technological side of EIS, and do not look at the<br />

effort from a socio-technical perspective, (2) concern mainly<br />

about sharing information in Federal/Central governments, (3) do<br />

not map the influential factors on different stages of decisionmaking<br />

phases and (4) do not prioritise the influential factors<br />

based on their importance on different stages of decision-making<br />

process.<br />

2. EIS CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK<br />

2.1 Factors Influencing EIS in LGAs<br />

In this section, it is attempted to provide a rich and broad picture<br />

of five main areas influencing any IOS initiative (i.e. EIS) based<br />

on the procedural framework of Inter-organisational Systems’<br />

adoption proposed by Kurnia and Johnston [1]; (a) External<br />

Environment, (b) Capability of Organisation, (c) Technology<br />

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for<br />

personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are<br />

not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies<br />

bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for<br />

components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored.<br />

Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, to republish, to<br />

post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission<br />

and/or a fee.<br />

ICEGOV '12, October 22 - 25 2012, Albany, NY, USA<br />

Copyright 2012 ACM 978-1-4503-1200-4/12/10...$15.00<br />

Muhammad Kamal<br />

Brunel University<br />

Kingston Lane, UB8 3PH<br />

Uxbridge, United Kingdom<br />

Muhammad.Kamal@<br />

brunel.ac.uk<br />

485<br />

Sergio de Cesare<br />

Brunel University<br />

Kingston Lane, UB8 3PH<br />

Uxbridge, United Kingdom<br />

Sergio.deCesare@brunel.ac.uk<br />

Environment, (d) EIS Characteristics, and (e) Inter-departmental<br />

Environment. First factor group, External Environment, proposes<br />

that certain conditions outside the focal organisation may affect<br />

the decision to adopt any inter-organisational collaboration.<br />

Regarding EIS in LGAs, these factors include any pressure from<br />

outside the specific local authority (e.g. from the Central<br />

Government) that influence the department’s decision on sharing<br />

information electronically. Second factor group, Capability of<br />

Organisation, observes the capability of the focal organisation in<br />

adopting those innovations that require collaboration among its<br />

sections and departments. Third group of factor, Nature of<br />

Technology, considers all technological factors which require the<br />

establishment of any IOIS. It can be argued that LGAs suffer from<br />

what may be termed as “IT lag time” that means there is a large<br />

gap between the adoption of new technologies and its acceptance<br />

and reutilisation across the entire organisation. Forth group of<br />

factor, EIS characteristic, refers to all attributes of electronic<br />

information sharing such as benefits and costs that influence the<br />

decision over sharing information. In addition to these four areas,<br />

the decision over EIS incorporates extra influences arising from<br />

complex and dynamic interaction among different departments<br />

and their suppliers, known as Inter-departmental Environment.<br />

Nevertheless, these factors have yet to be evaluated through real<br />

and practical cases and therefore the researchers propose the<br />

following research proposition for further investigation:<br />

Research Proposition A – Proposed Factors Influencing EIS:<br />

The proposed factors may influence the decision-making on EIS in<br />

inter-departmental collaboration in LGAs.<br />

2.2 Investigating the Phases of Participation<br />

Rogers [2] indicates that an adoption process is the process in<br />

which an individual or agency first, experiences the knowledge of<br />

innovation, second, alters the attitudes towards that innovation,<br />

third, makes decision to adopt or reject, and last, implements and<br />

confirms the decision. Regarding inter-departmental information<br />

sharing in LGAs, it would be vital to clarify the stages in which<br />

each department goes through prior to information sharing effort.<br />

These stages that lead to institutionalisation of EIS within LGAs<br />

might be conceptualised as temporal consequences in which the<br />

agencies pass through from the initiation phase to sustainability.<br />

After analysing innovation adoption literature on private and<br />

public sector, the researchers propose five phases of decisionmaking<br />

for EIS; (a) Incentive that refers to the state when a<br />

department within an LGA is asked or wishes to share information<br />

electronically with another department, (b) Conception that<br />

signifies a plan of action that the agency should pursue. In the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!