15.11.2012 Views

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evolving e-Government Benchmarking to Better Cover<br />

Technology Development and Emerging Societal Needs<br />

Kim Andreasson<br />

DAKA Advisory<br />

Alvgatan 3<br />

432 38 Varberg, Sweden<br />

+1 646 845 9782<br />

kim@dakaadvisory.com<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Many international e-government benchmarks seek to measure<br />

progress towards various versions of a digital society, and in this<br />

endeavor include a component of e-government. But because<br />

comparable international e-government data are scarce, most<br />

reports rely on the United Nations E-Government Development<br />

Index, specifically its Online Service Index as a benchmark.<br />

However, this assessment only captures national level initiatives<br />

at a broad level and does not link evaluation to outcomes and<br />

impacts, i.e. e-government performance relative to investment.<br />

This paper briefly reviews the current UN framework and assesses<br />

how it can evolve to meet new demands, such as calls to better<br />

connect investments to policy goals, and evolving user behavior.<br />

It also places this in the context of new technology trends, like<br />

mobile and social media which have not yet been fully embraced<br />

by e-government but which are likely to become increasingly<br />

important. Similarly, important trends in benchmarking and in<br />

benchmarking tools are surveyed.<br />

For example, is it possible to measure outcomes in a cost effective<br />

manner? What might be the role of non-UN data and of web<br />

metrics and social media analytics? How could relevant data and<br />

other information be better presented to countries and decisionmakers<br />

in order to strengthen the goal of using the UN survey to<br />

support learning and improvement? In this context, the paper<br />

outlines the next feasible steps which the UN and similar<br />

benchmarks might adopt, including how the framework might be<br />

applied to local level assessments.<br />

Categories and Subject Descriptors<br />

K.4.1 [Public Policy Issues]<br />

General Terms<br />

Measurement, Documentation, Performance, Design<br />

Keywords<br />

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for<br />

personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are<br />

not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies<br />

bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for<br />

components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored.<br />

Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, to republish, to<br />

post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission<br />

and/or a fee.<br />

ICEGOV '12, October 22 - 25 2012, Albany, NY, United States, NY, USA<br />

Copyright 2012 ACM 978-1-4503-1200-4/12/10…$15.00.<br />

Jeremy Millard<br />

Danish Technological Institute<br />

Kongsvangs Allé 20<br />

2000 Aarhus C, Denmark<br />

+45 72 20 14 17<br />

jrm@teknologisk.dk<br />

430<br />

Mikael Snaprud<br />

Tingtun & University of Agder<br />

N-4791 Lillesand, Norway<br />

+47 91 862 892<br />

mikael.snaprud@tingtun.no<br />

E-Government, United Nations, Technology Trends,<br />

Benchmarking Trends, Benchmarking Tools, Benchmarking<br />

Framework<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Benchmarking the information society is important in order for<br />

policy-makers to understand it and how to achieve better<br />

outcomes from additional investment.<br />

The benefits of a digital society are everywhere: the 2011 Future<br />

of the Internet Economy report from the OECD says that between<br />

2000 and 2009 investments in ICT contributed more to GDP<br />

growth than all non-ICT investments in a majority of its Member<br />

States. [1] Also in 2011, the McKinsey Global Institute, a<br />

consultancy research arm, estimated the Internet's share of GDP to<br />

be greater than many traditional industries. [2] Currently, the<br />

report said, the Internet contributes 3.4% across the G8 countries,<br />

South Korea, Sweden, Brazil, China, and India. Among mature<br />

economies, 21% of growth in the last five years has come from<br />

the Internet.<br />

The potential benefits also increase as more people take part in the<br />

digital society. One example of how rapidly people are coming<br />

online is in Europe where 34% of individuals were regularly using<br />

the Internet in 2003; in 2011, the number stood at 68%, according<br />

to Eurostat the European statistics office. [3] The rise is also<br />

global in nature. According to the International<br />

Telecommunications Union (ITU), a specialized agency of the<br />

United Nations (UN), the number of Internet users globally has<br />

increased from 6.4 per 100 people in 2000 to 29.7 in 2010. The<br />

agency predicts that the world will go from two billion Internet<br />

users in 2010 to five billion in 2015. [4]<br />

Because of the potential benefits, understanding and measuring<br />

the factors behind the digital society are increasingly important as<br />

countries become more connected and interconnected. Prominent<br />

examples of research reports that use international benchmarks to<br />

measure progress towards various aspects of a digital society<br />

include the World Economic Forum’s Global Information<br />

Technology Report, the Economist Intelligence Unit’s Digital<br />

Economy Rankings, the Nokia Siemens Networks Connectivity<br />

Scorecard, and the Partnership on Measuring ICT for<br />

Development, coordinated and funded by the International<br />

Telecommunications (ITU), a specialized agency of the UN, the<br />

European Commission and Waseda University.<br />

One commonality between such efforts to measure digital<br />

progress is that they include a component of electronic<br />

government (e-government). The development of e-government<br />

has also been rapid by any measure but a commonly cited

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!