15.11.2012 Views

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Genres of Communication in Activist eParticipation:<br />

A Comparison of New and Old Media<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In this paper, we examine the genres of communication in an<br />

activist case in a Norwegian municipality. As genres evolve over<br />

time, and the emergence of new genre properties is a sign of a<br />

mature technology, we compare the genres used in traditional<br />

paper-based media with the genres used in social media, to<br />

examine the maturity of social media as a medium for activist<br />

eParticipation. We also discuss the usage patterns of traditional<br />

vs. social media, and their relation to the public sphere. Our<br />

findings indicate that so far, the genres used for activism in social<br />

media are very similar to their offline counterparts, with some<br />

new genres and genre characteristics emerging. Social media is<br />

moving towards maturity, but still has a way to go.<br />

Categories and Subject Descriptors<br />

K.4. [Computers and Society]<br />

General Terms<br />

Measurement, Documentation, Human Factors, Theory<br />

Keywords<br />

eParticipation, Social Media, Genre Theory, Public Sphere<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Our media and communication habits are increasingly moving<br />

towards the digital domain and to social media. While political<br />

communication has been lagging behind, this area is also<br />

increasingly becoming digitized [1, 2], and as such is forced to<br />

change in order to adapt to the logic of two-way communication<br />

media [3]. This move towards new media has been hastened by<br />

what is perceived as a lessening of civic engagement in traditional<br />

channels. Voter turnout is in decline [4], there are fewer members<br />

of political parties, and less interest for political participation and<br />

debate [5]. These perceived threats to democracy have led<br />

government towards a number of projects where digital media is<br />

used in an attempt to boost participation and civic engagement [2,<br />

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for<br />

personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are<br />

not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies<br />

bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for<br />

components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored.<br />

Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, to republish, to<br />

post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission<br />

and/or a fee.<br />

ICEGOV '12, October 22 - 25 2012, Albany, NY, United States, NY, USA<br />

Copyright 2012 ACM 978-1-4503-1200-4/12/10…$15.00.<br />

Marius Rohde Johannessen<br />

University of Agder, dept. of Information Systems<br />

Service box 422, NO-4604 Kristiansand, Norway<br />

+47 38 14 17 14<br />

marius.johannessen@uia.no<br />

48<br />

6, 7].<br />

The public sphere, said to have disappeared in the age of mass<br />

media, has re-emerged online [8, 9]. But how new is the online<br />

public sphere? How much has political communication online<br />

been adapted to the two-way, inclusive logic of “new” media?<br />

To answer this question, we look towards genre theory. Genre<br />

theory tells us that communicative acts recurring over time, with<br />

similar form and function, can be analyzed and categorized into a<br />

set of communication genres [10]. Genres used within an<br />

organization or a given context can further be categorized into a<br />

repertoire of suitable genres for a given context [11].<br />

When moving from “old” to “new” media, genres from the old<br />

medium will typically be copied as-is and used for some time in<br />

the new. After some time, new genres emerge, and old ones are<br />

adapted to fit the new medium. The maturity of a medium can to<br />

some degree be measured by examining the genres of the new and<br />

old medium [12]. Maturity is in this case understood as the degree<br />

to which the actors involved in using the medium agree on the<br />

conventions and rules for the medium, as well as the emergence of<br />

new genres, or old genres which are adapted to the functionality<br />

of the new medium.<br />

In this paper, we identify the genre systems used for political<br />

activist communication in new and old media, through a case<br />

study of an urban development project in a mid-sized Norwegian<br />

city. The actors involved in the case have used both traditional<br />

print media, social media and the Internet in their communication,<br />

and this allows us to categorize the same message as different<br />

genres in different media.<br />

In addition, we discuss these findings against the ideals of the<br />

public sphere [13]. Are the new media mature enough to cater for<br />

a public sphere, or are we still in transition between the “old” and<br />

“new”? And if there is an online public sphere in this case, what<br />

kind of public sphere is it? Finally, we discuss how social capital<br />

impacts participation and the public sphere.<br />

The rest of the paper is structured as follows: Section two presents<br />

our theoretical foundation, consisting of the public sphere, genre<br />

theory and social capital. Sections three and four outline the<br />

research method we have applied, and presents a thick case<br />

description. In section five we present our findings, which are<br />

separated into the genre analysis of the new and old media, and an<br />

analysis of the extent to which these genre systems support a<br />

public sphere. Finally, we present our conclusions, limitations and<br />

some possibilities for future research.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!