icegov2012 proceedings

[61] Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P., Littleboy, D.,
(2004). “Barriers and benefits in the adoption of
eGovernment”. In Governmnet Information Quarterly, 20,
pp: 365-387.
[62] Van Ryzin, G., (2006). Piece of a puzzle:
linking government performances, citizens satisfaction and
trust. A performing Public Sector: the Second Transatlantic
Dialogue. June, Leuven, Belgium.
[63] European Council, (2010). European Council
conclusion on Europe 2020 strategy inclusive Digital
Agenda. Conclusion of the European Council.
[64] Fugini, M., Maggiolini, P., Krysnaia, N.,
Boselli, R., Cesarini, M., Mezzamanica, M, (2008). Why is
True eGovernment still difficult to be achieved? In IFIP –
International Federation for Information Processing,
Volume 280: “eGovernment; ICT Professionalism and
Competence; Service Science”; Antonino Mazzeo, Roberto
Bellini, Gianmario Motta (Ed. Boston: Springler). pp: 11-
20.
[65] Van Ryzin, G., (2009). Outcome, Process and
citizens’ trust of the civil services. Paper prepared for the
10 th National Management Research Conference, October 1-
4. Ohio State University, John Glenn School of Public
Affairs, Columbus, USA.
[66] Belanger, F., Carter, L., (2008). “Trust and
risk in eGovernment adoption”. In Strategic Information
Systems, 17( ), pp: 165-176.
[67] Anttiroiko, A-V., (2008). Local eGovernment
for Development: preliminary remarks.
[68] Teicholz, E., (1984). “Computer Integrated
manufacturing”.InDatamation. 30(3), pp: 169-170.
[69] Hammer, M., Champy, J., (1993).
Reengineering the Corporation. New York: Harper Collins
Publisher.
[70] Peppard, J., Rowland, P., (1995).The essence
of Business Process Reengineering. Series Edition: Adrian
Buckley.
[71] Van de Walle, S., (2002). Public services
performance and trust in government: the problem of
causality. Paper prepared for the Annual Conference of the
European Group of Public Administration Study. Group 2:
Productivity and Quality in the Public Sector. September 4-
7. Potsdam.
[72] Janssen, D., Rotthier, S., Snijkers, K., (2004).
“If you measure it they will score: an assessment of
international eGovernmnet benchmarking”. In Information
Policy. 9(3/4), pp:121-130.
[73] Heeks R., Molla A., (2009), Impact
assessment of ICT development projects: a compendium of
approaches, Manchester University Institute for
development policy and management, Ed. Development
Informatics Group.
[74] Arnaboldi, M., Azzone, G. Savoldelli, A.
(2004) “Managing a public sector project: the case of the
Italian Treasury Ministry”. In: International Journal of
Project Management 22: 213–223.
[75] Bekkers, V., Homburg, V., (2007). “The
myths of eGovernment: looking beyond the assumptions of
296
a new better government”. In The Information Society,
23(5), pp: 373-382.
[76] Holzer M., Kloby K., (2005), “Sustaining
citizen-driven performances improvement: models for
adaptation and issues of sustainability”. In The Public
Sector Innovation Journal, Vol. 10, No, 1.
[77] Kearns, I., (2004), “Public Value and
Electronic Service Delivery: The UK Experience”. In
eGovernment Reconsidered: Renewal of Governence for the
Knowledge Age. Edited by E. L. Oliver & L. Sanders,
Canadian Plains Research Center, University of Regina.
[78] Omar, K., Scheepers, H., Stockdale, R.,
(2011), eGovernment Services Quality Assessment through
the Public Value Lens., In proceedings of the 10 th IFIP WG
8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2011, Delft, The
Netherlands, August/September, pp:431-440.
[79] Shah, R., C., Kesan, J., P., (2010). “Software
Governance”, in eGovernment Information, Technology and
Transformation, Ed H. J. Scholl. AMIIS – Advances in
Management Information Systems, Vladimir Zwass Series
Editor. Chapter 8, pp: 125-140.
[80] Foley, K., (2006). Using the value measuring
methodology to evaluate government initiatives.
Proceedings of the 2006 Crystal Ball User Conference. May
1-3. Denver. Colorado.
[81] US Chief Information Office (US CIO), Value
Measuring Methodology. How to Guide, 2002, US CIO:
Washington DC.
[82] UK Office for Government Commerce,
Measuring the Expected Benefits of E-Government, 2003,
OGC: London.
[83] SDAE (2005), MAREVA Méthode d’Analyse et de
REmontée de la Valeur. Available at
https://www.ateliers.modernisation.gouv.fr/ministeres/doma
ines_d_expertise/budget_et_controle_d/public/foire-auxquestions/downloadFile/file/09.%20FAQ.zip?nocache=1195
568309.47
[84] Codagnone C. (2007). Measuring
eGovernment: Reflections from eGEP Measurement
Framework Experience. European Review of Political
Technologies, 4, 89-106.
[85] Codagnone, C. (2008). eGEP 2.0. Brussels:
Delivered for the European Commission, DG Information
Society.
[86] Parasuraman, A., Grewal, D., (2000). “The
Impact of Technology on the Quality-Value-Loyalty Chain:
a Research Agenda”. In Journal of the Academy of
Marketing Science. 28(1), pp: 168-174.
[87] Dawes, S., S., Pardo, T., (2002). Building
collaborative digital government system. In W.J. McIver, &
A.K. Elmagarmid (Eds.), Advances in digital government.
Technology, human factors and policy. Norwell, MA.
Kluwer Academic Publisher.
[88] Treasury Board of Canada (2004). Performance
Measurement for the Government online Initiative. This
document is available in alternative formats and on the
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat’s Web site at the
following address:www.tbs-sct.gc.ca