icegov2012 proceedings
icegov2012 proceedings
icegov2012 proceedings
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3. REGIONAL DRIVERS OF THE E-<br />
GOVERNMENT AGENDA<br />
This section pinpoints the common efforts to develop e-<br />
Government from a regional perspective, notably coming from<br />
international, intergovernmental, or transnational organizations<br />
devoted to formulate, design, fund, and implement projects,<br />
initiatives, or regulations in this field. In doing so, we look at the<br />
priorities, areas, and the type of projects enhanced by these<br />
regional actors and organizations during the last years. This<br />
analysis facilitates the understanding of how the e-Government<br />
development within a region with very different administrative<br />
realities has tended to share some common policy frames. In this<br />
endeavor, some institutions like the CEPAL (United Nations<br />
Economic Commission for Latin America), CLAD (Latin<br />
American Center for Developing Administration), IDB (Inter-<br />
American Development Bank), OAS (Organization of American<br />
States), among others, have played a prominent role in fulfilling<br />
regional approaches to build up e-Government.<br />
One of the first regional definitions of e-Government derived<br />
from the Ibero-American Chart for Electronic Government (Carta<br />
Iberoamericana de Gobierno Electrónico) (ICEG) [3]. The<br />
definition of e-Government refers to the ‘use of ICTs in public<br />
administration to enhance the information and services offered to<br />
the citizens, to support public management efficacy and efficiency,<br />
and to improve the transparency of public sector and the<br />
participation of the citizens’ [3:7]. This is important while<br />
different country definitions and approaches to e-Government<br />
have been rooted in similar principles. Other recent efforts have<br />
emerged from the CLAD group of countries, i.e., the Ibero-<br />
American Interoperability Framework, the Ibero-American Model<br />
of Pubic Software for e-Government, or the Ibero-American<br />
Framework for Social Electronic Identification. Undoubtedly,<br />
these official documents have been cited and used in national<br />
strategies and blueprints, and they still provide shared guidelines<br />
fostering e-Government in the region.<br />
Other sources of regional influence and vision for the<br />
development of e-Government in LatAm have derived from the<br />
eLAC strategies. eLAC is a regional strategy for the development<br />
of Information Society (IS) from a harmonized perspective, with<br />
the support of CEPAL, using ICTs as instruments for economic<br />
development and social inclusion. Initially, it was endorsed in<br />
2005 in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) as a long-term vision (until 2015)<br />
with short terms milestones (eLac 2007 and eLac 2010), in line<br />
with the Millenimum Development goals and those of the IS<br />
World Summit, which adopted concrete qualitative and<br />
quantitative goals to be achieved, also in the field of e-<br />
Government [1]. In general, the e-Government section of eLAC<br />
2015 fosters the diffusion of governmental agencies on the web<br />
and the sophistication of electronic services on-line [2]. This set<br />
of goals gives a sense of common ideas, values, and priorities<br />
within the diversity of the region. Another key aspect is the eLAC<br />
2015 focus on integration, interoperability, common standards,<br />
and collaborative work in the region.<br />
An archetype instrument derived from eLAC 2015 is the creation<br />
of the Network of e-Government Leaders of Latin America and<br />
the Caribbean (REDGEALC). REDGEALC has promoted the<br />
collaboration of LatAm governments from a technical point of<br />
view. This network of national experts acts as a forum to boost e-<br />
Government in the region, but also as an institutional mechanism<br />
to enforce, even informally, the policy transfer process in the<br />
77<br />
field. REDGEALC actions, meetings, and projects are funded by<br />
international organizations like the IDB or OAS, and it is intended<br />
to deepen the technical collaboration among the units devoted to<br />
manage national e-Government policies and strategies within the<br />
countries of the region. At the same, REDGEALC has expanded a<br />
network of key players, less political and more administrative,<br />
putting together a pool of middle-level managers involved in<br />
fostering e-Government in the region. One of the most remarkable<br />
projects of REDGEALC is eGobex, a common tool for sharing e-<br />
Government knowledge and applications at national, regional, and<br />
local layers (see: http://www.egobex.net/home/en/). This platform<br />
of solutions is based on different topics, among others, electronic<br />
citizen services, document management, e-justice, m-government,<br />
human resources management, e-procurement, or e-health.<br />
eGobex also facilitates other tools by facilitating the exchange of<br />
experiences among the public administrations of the region,<br />
providing a pool of experts in different aspects of e-Government,<br />
or offering virtual training for practitioners. Also, news and<br />
comments about developments of e-Government in the LatAm<br />
region are also provided by this shared digital platform.<br />
In sum, eLAC 2015 guidelines, REDGEALC network, as well as<br />
CEPAL, and other abovementioned international and<br />
intergovernmental institutions (CLAD, OAS, etc.), and the<br />
instruments behind them, play the role of framing this policy field,<br />
targeting the type of e-Government actions that need to be<br />
enhanced, adopted, funded, and implemented by national public<br />
administrations of the region. This group of instruments operates<br />
as policy carriers, or policy transfer instruments. In some cases<br />
they proceed as coercive mechanisms, while they can impose<br />
views about what type of projects will be funded. In other cases,<br />
they frame with ideas and rationales behind the strategies to foster<br />
e-Government nationally. Whatever the case, it is clear that this<br />
process has been, and it is, promoted within the LatAm region.<br />
4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION<br />
This paper has explored the most salient aspects of the e-<br />
Government policy transfer process within the countries of<br />
LatAm. The question motivating this study is whether or not Latin<br />
American countries are building their national e-Government<br />
policies with a regional perspective. The preliminary assumption<br />
of this paper is that some international, intergovernmental, and<br />
transnational organizations are shaping, at least in some extent,<br />
the ideas, priorities, and initiatives implemented by the<br />
governments of this region of the World. The analysis of previous<br />
sections suggests the verification of this hypothesis.<br />
Consequently, one may support the idea that e-Government in<br />
LatAm may exemplify a policy transfer process.<br />
Overall, one may say that e-Government policy ideas and frames<br />
in LatAm countries derive from the abovementioned international,<br />
inter-governmental, and transnational organizations. These actors<br />
have played a growing role within an emergent policy field (e-<br />
Government), in which a number of developing countries have put<br />
their expectations to modernize their public sectors. What is more,<br />
in developing countries e-Government projects are funded by<br />
these organizations. This facilitates defining priorities, objectives,<br />
and even in some cases, applications, platforms, and vendors<br />
involved in the design, and implementation processes at national<br />
level. Nonetheless, further investigation will be needed in the<br />
future to identify in detail how the regional diffusion of ideas is<br />
implemented in specific countries, and to what extent