icegov2012 proceedings
icegov2012 proceedings
icegov2012 proceedings
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Exhaustiveness indicates that all categories should be included<br />
within a typology. For U-services, exhaustiveness has an<br />
important significance in that the U-services are not fixed or static<br />
but highly likely to develop into convergence services according<br />
to their necessity. If a U-service typology lacks exhaustiveness, it<br />
may be meaningless as a typology because it will not cover all of<br />
the U-services that can be created or terminated depending on<br />
environment.<br />
Mutual exclusiveness can be a good condition for typology in that<br />
confusion may be caused if there is a logical overlap between<br />
categories or if a single concept simultaneously falls into different<br />
categories, but actually it is difficult to meet in social sciences<br />
where each classification target does not have a rapid discontinuity<br />
between categories. In particular, the condition of mutual<br />
exclusiveness is difficult to satisfy in U-services that include many<br />
convergence services, and thus if this is taken into account, it will<br />
end up just in enumeration, not in classification.<br />
Parsimony is the concept that when other conditions are the same,<br />
the simpler classification model the better and the more<br />
complicated the worse. However, the parsimony a typology has is<br />
commonly against the practical value of the classification model.<br />
Accordingly, if a category becomes too wide for parsimony, the<br />
classification may be made simpler than necessary and thus not be<br />
of help in empirical studies or practical applications. For U-service<br />
classification models, it is difficult to ensure parsimony due to the<br />
complexity of U-services themselves. However, if the principle of<br />
parsimony is not met, the U-service classification models can end<br />
up merely serving for enumeration, not as typology, due to the<br />
complexity of services themselves.<br />
Empirical workability indicates that operations for measurement<br />
should be possible when verification is conducted with an<br />
involved person’s arbitrary decisions limited to a minimum in<br />
classification. However, the lack of such empirical workability is a<br />
troublesome problem which is present in most classification<br />
models available in social sciences and can be considered as an<br />
inherent limitation of social science research that takes advantage<br />
of abstract concepts.<br />
Theoretical fruitfulness is that it will be good if eventually a<br />
typology itself presents a generally acceptable theory. As<br />
mentioned above, this theoretical fruitfulness commonly conflicts<br />
with empirical workability. The reason is that due to the<br />
abstractness of classification criteria it is very uncommon that the<br />
classification models making theoretical fruitfulness actually<br />
extend to empirical studies.<br />
In this study, we selected Jeong’s typology and heuristically<br />
classified 228 unit U-services being currently developed in Korea<br />
after their application to the selected system. The results of<br />
classification were empirically analyzed in terms of whether they<br />
are compliant with the five conditions. Through the analysis this<br />
study identified the shortcomings of the total U-service typology<br />
and other things that need to be made up for in the system.<br />
3. ANALYSIS<br />
In evaluating the appropriateness of Jeong’s U-service typology,<br />
this study examined the distribution patterns and characteristics of<br />
current services by assigning 228 unit services to eight medium<br />
classification categories (i.e., spatial units, spatial facilities,<br />
service providers, beneficiaries, service objectives, urban activities,<br />
281<br />
human behaviors, and function-implementing methods), exclusive<br />
of laws/institutions.<br />
3.1 Procedure<br />
The medium category of “laws/institutions,” unlike other<br />
classification criteria, represents which laws include U-servicerelated<br />
provisions, rather than a set of actual services. This<br />
category was excluded because it was not fit for the purpose of<br />
this study, and eight other medium categories of actual services<br />
were used in this study.<br />
In the classification of U-services into eight medium categories,<br />
the 228 unit services were verified through in-depth interviews<br />
with three experts selected from those who participated in the U-<br />
Eco City project for two or more years. As the first activity of<br />
service classification, each expert reviewed a list of 228 Uservices<br />
and classified the U-services appropriately into one of the<br />
given categories. The second activity was to compare the Uservice<br />
classifications with those by two other experts. In the<br />
coherence of service classification, 195 (85.5%) of 228 unit<br />
services were consistently classified by all the three experts as<br />
“culture, tourism or sports” but the classification of 11 services<br />
(4.8%) was completely inconsistent among the experts who<br />
categorized them as “transportation, health care, facility<br />
management or labor/employment.”<br />
3.2 Heuristics Used<br />
Table 2(Fig. 1-8) shows how the services were categorized. The<br />
classification of 228 unit services by the given criteria revealed the<br />
following limitations: (1) the definitions of some small categories<br />
were unclear to use for classification purposes; (2) there was a<br />
preponderance of certain categories in the classification of Uservices;<br />
and (3) there were similar items overlapping between<br />
medium-categories.<br />
First, some classification criteria were unclearly defined. Two<br />
examples are the definition of information media facility services<br />
as types of “services provided from fixed facilities” and the<br />
definition of unit-space control facility services as types of<br />
“services limited to facilities and their attached facilities.” Both<br />
of the definitions reflect the concept of “services provided from<br />
facilities,” and accordingly this causes confusion when services<br />
are actually classified. For instance, the “traffic signal violation<br />
enforcement service” working on the road can be recognized as<br />
being provided from fixed facilities and at the same time viewed<br />
as that limited to attached facilities. Moreover, if it is unclear<br />
whether service beneficiaries are the public or business entities,<br />
the human behavior forms of moving and cybering can be<br />
considered for service classification. Second, when the 228 unit<br />
services were classified in terms of their names, some<br />
classification criteria were found to play only a nominal role rather<br />
than serve as typology. For example, in the service classification<br />
by urban activities, the category of “security/safety” represented<br />
95% of transportation services, 100% of crime/disaster prevention<br />
services, and 93% of facility management services; and the<br />
category of “leisure” included 94% of culture, tourism and sports<br />
services. This typology does not seem to reflect service types in a<br />
balanced way, and therefore further studies need to focus on<br />
reducing the uneven distribution of classification items and<br />
making classification criteria more practical. Third, there were<br />
similar items overlapping between medium categories. Especially,