15.11.2012 Views

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

icegov2012 proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Exhaustiveness indicates that all categories should be included<br />

within a typology. For U-services, exhaustiveness has an<br />

important significance in that the U-services are not fixed or static<br />

but highly likely to develop into convergence services according<br />

to their necessity. If a U-service typology lacks exhaustiveness, it<br />

may be meaningless as a typology because it will not cover all of<br />

the U-services that can be created or terminated depending on<br />

environment.<br />

Mutual exclusiveness can be a good condition for typology in that<br />

confusion may be caused if there is a logical overlap between<br />

categories or if a single concept simultaneously falls into different<br />

categories, but actually it is difficult to meet in social sciences<br />

where each classification target does not have a rapid discontinuity<br />

between categories. In particular, the condition of mutual<br />

exclusiveness is difficult to satisfy in U-services that include many<br />

convergence services, and thus if this is taken into account, it will<br />

end up just in enumeration, not in classification.<br />

Parsimony is the concept that when other conditions are the same,<br />

the simpler classification model the better and the more<br />

complicated the worse. However, the parsimony a typology has is<br />

commonly against the practical value of the classification model.<br />

Accordingly, if a category becomes too wide for parsimony, the<br />

classification may be made simpler than necessary and thus not be<br />

of help in empirical studies or practical applications. For U-service<br />

classification models, it is difficult to ensure parsimony due to the<br />

complexity of U-services themselves. However, if the principle of<br />

parsimony is not met, the U-service classification models can end<br />

up merely serving for enumeration, not as typology, due to the<br />

complexity of services themselves.<br />

Empirical workability indicates that operations for measurement<br />

should be possible when verification is conducted with an<br />

involved person’s arbitrary decisions limited to a minimum in<br />

classification. However, the lack of such empirical workability is a<br />

troublesome problem which is present in most classification<br />

models available in social sciences and can be considered as an<br />

inherent limitation of social science research that takes advantage<br />

of abstract concepts.<br />

Theoretical fruitfulness is that it will be good if eventually a<br />

typology itself presents a generally acceptable theory. As<br />

mentioned above, this theoretical fruitfulness commonly conflicts<br />

with empirical workability. The reason is that due to the<br />

abstractness of classification criteria it is very uncommon that the<br />

classification models making theoretical fruitfulness actually<br />

extend to empirical studies.<br />

In this study, we selected Jeong’s typology and heuristically<br />

classified 228 unit U-services being currently developed in Korea<br />

after their application to the selected system. The results of<br />

classification were empirically analyzed in terms of whether they<br />

are compliant with the five conditions. Through the analysis this<br />

study identified the shortcomings of the total U-service typology<br />

and other things that need to be made up for in the system.<br />

3. ANALYSIS<br />

In evaluating the appropriateness of Jeong’s U-service typology,<br />

this study examined the distribution patterns and characteristics of<br />

current services by assigning 228 unit services to eight medium<br />

classification categories (i.e., spatial units, spatial facilities,<br />

service providers, beneficiaries, service objectives, urban activities,<br />

281<br />

human behaviors, and function-implementing methods), exclusive<br />

of laws/institutions.<br />

3.1 Procedure<br />

The medium category of “laws/institutions,” unlike other<br />

classification criteria, represents which laws include U-servicerelated<br />

provisions, rather than a set of actual services. This<br />

category was excluded because it was not fit for the purpose of<br />

this study, and eight other medium categories of actual services<br />

were used in this study.<br />

In the classification of U-services into eight medium categories,<br />

the 228 unit services were verified through in-depth interviews<br />

with three experts selected from those who participated in the U-<br />

Eco City project for two or more years. As the first activity of<br />

service classification, each expert reviewed a list of 228 Uservices<br />

and classified the U-services appropriately into one of the<br />

given categories. The second activity was to compare the Uservice<br />

classifications with those by two other experts. In the<br />

coherence of service classification, 195 (85.5%) of 228 unit<br />

services were consistently classified by all the three experts as<br />

“culture, tourism or sports” but the classification of 11 services<br />

(4.8%) was completely inconsistent among the experts who<br />

categorized them as “transportation, health care, facility<br />

management or labor/employment.”<br />

3.2 Heuristics Used<br />

Table 2(Fig. 1-8) shows how the services were categorized. The<br />

classification of 228 unit services by the given criteria revealed the<br />

following limitations: (1) the definitions of some small categories<br />

were unclear to use for classification purposes; (2) there was a<br />

preponderance of certain categories in the classification of Uservices;<br />

and (3) there were similar items overlapping between<br />

medium-categories.<br />

First, some classification criteria were unclearly defined. Two<br />

examples are the definition of information media facility services<br />

as types of “services provided from fixed facilities” and the<br />

definition of unit-space control facility services as types of<br />

“services limited to facilities and their attached facilities.” Both<br />

of the definitions reflect the concept of “services provided from<br />

facilities,” and accordingly this causes confusion when services<br />

are actually classified. For instance, the “traffic signal violation<br />

enforcement service” working on the road can be recognized as<br />

being provided from fixed facilities and at the same time viewed<br />

as that limited to attached facilities. Moreover, if it is unclear<br />

whether service beneficiaries are the public or business entities,<br />

the human behavior forms of moving and cybering can be<br />

considered for service classification. Second, when the 228 unit<br />

services were classified in terms of their names, some<br />

classification criteria were found to play only a nominal role rather<br />

than serve as typology. For example, in the service classification<br />

by urban activities, the category of “security/safety” represented<br />

95% of transportation services, 100% of crime/disaster prevention<br />

services, and 93% of facility management services; and the<br />

category of “leisure” included 94% of culture, tourism and sports<br />

services. This typology does not seem to reflect service types in a<br />

balanced way, and therefore further studies need to focus on<br />

reducing the uneven distribution of classification items and<br />

making classification criteria more practical. Third, there were<br />

similar items overlapping between medium categories. Especially,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!