20.11.2012 Views

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

postulated by theologians and philosophers - but the private creation <strong>of</strong> that individual’<br />

(Rizzuto 1979: 221). Thirdly, she addresses the origins <strong>of</strong> religious experience and belief in<br />

the psyche, not objective belief in God. While this may have reassured her psychoanalytic<br />

and scientifically biased audience (Rizzuto 1979: 84, 211) it limits Rizzuto’s work to a<br />

‘parallel line’ engagement as seen in Meissner.<br />

From these foundations Rizzuto begins by identifying the complex heritage Freud had given<br />

to psychoanalysis and religion. He helpfully recognized the link between parental figures<br />

and the idea <strong>of</strong> God, but his illusionary view <strong>of</strong> God that became orthodox belief in<br />

psychoanalysis resulted in,<br />

generations <strong>of</strong> psychoanalysts who ... dropped whatever religion they had at the<br />

doors <strong>of</strong> their institutes. If they refused to do so, they managed to disassociate their<br />

beliefs from analytic training and practice, with the sad effect <strong>of</strong> having an important<br />

area <strong>of</strong> their own lives untouched by their training. If they dealt with religion during<br />

their own analyses, that was the beginning and the end <strong>of</strong> it (Rizzuto 1979: 4).<br />

Paradoxically Freud was baffled ‘with the problem <strong>of</strong> human religiosity and belief in the<br />

Divinity’ (Rizzuto 1979: 11). Rizzuto focuses on Freud’s statement ‘all <strong>of</strong> the child's later<br />

choices <strong>of</strong> friendship and love follow upon the basis <strong>of</strong> the memory-traces left behind by<br />

these first prototypes’ (Rizzuto 1979: 6f.). 218 Rizzuto establishes that Freud postulated an<br />

early form <strong>of</strong> object relations theory, 219 then utilizing current psychoanalytic theory, 220<br />

answers the question ‘why do early imagos evolve into a God?’<br />

218 Found in Freud (1914) ‘Some reflections on schoolboy psychology’ SE 13.<br />

219 Later developed in Britain by Fairbairn, Guntrip, the Balints and especially Winnicott, as well as ego and<br />

self-psychology developed by Hartmann, Jacobson, Mahler, Kernberg and Kohut. The history <strong>of</strong> the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> object relations theory can be found in Greenberg and Mitchell from an American perspective<br />

(Greenberg and Mitchell 1983) and Gomez from a British perspective (Gomez 1996). Kernberg <strong>of</strong>fers an<br />

overview <strong>of</strong> both traditions (Kernberg 2005).<br />

220 Image formation, symbolization, internal objects, primary process thinking and the emergence <strong>of</strong> self -<br />

embracing object relations theorists, developmental theorists, ego-psychology theorists and self psychology<br />

theorists.<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!