20.11.2012 Views

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sense <strong>of</strong> who we are and what we do. 292 Black illustrates this from the Buddhist concept <strong>of</strong><br />

trikaya (‘three-body’) which ‘<strong>of</strong>fers three ways <strong>of</strong> relating to the essential notion <strong>of</strong><br />

Buddhahood, each reflective <strong>of</strong> the psychological development <strong>of</strong> the practitioner,<br />

culminating in the proper experience <strong>of</strong> Buddhahood as ultimate reality itself, empty <strong>of</strong> any<br />

dualities’ (Prebish and Keown 2006: 110). 293 ‘The trikaya is not a relationship <strong>of</strong> ‘persons’<br />

like the Christian Trinity, but a powerful intellectual structure for making comprehensible,<br />

and promoting, a certain range <strong>of</strong> experiences. These experiences, in particular, are those<br />

encountered in meditation’ (Black 1993a: 621). It <strong>of</strong>fers a move from the physical and the<br />

embodied, to the transitional held through theoretical constructs, to the transcendent. Black<br />

suggests that this doctrine emerged out <strong>of</strong> the felt need for an internal object containing all<br />

psychic states, projective identifications, and inward experiences. While Black finds<br />

correspondence between object relations theory and Buddhism, he suggests there is a<br />

fundamental difference related to truth as the ‘crunch question for religion in response to the<br />

psychoanalytic challenge’ (Black 1993a: 622).<br />

Psychoanalytic concepts are heuristic devices which do not claim, as religious statements<br />

do, to be objective and ultimate truth. For example there is a concept <strong>of</strong> an ‘internal mother’<br />

but there is no actual ‘internal mother’. The presence <strong>of</strong> internal and external objects sets up<br />

a tension between internal and external reality first identified by Winnicott (Winnicott<br />

1935/1958). So a Buddhist internal object is an internalization <strong>of</strong> external Buddhist truths,<br />

morality and values brought about through meditation. There are positive aspects to this<br />

292 Rizzuto’s unique contribution was to suggest that religious objects and representations belonged in the<br />

same category as internal object representations, although Black seems unaware <strong>of</strong> her work at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

writing this article.<br />

293 These include the ‘apparitional body (nirmanakaya), enjoyment body (sambhogakaya) and the essence<br />

body (dharmakaya)’ (Prebish and Keown 2006: 286).<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!