20.11.2012 Views

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

his career Loewald expressed his regret that he had not explored religion further: however,<br />

he discussed this with a psychoanalytic colleague resulting in an important multi-<br />

disciplinary text <strong>Psychoanalysis</strong> and Religion (Smith and Handelman 1990) 128 whose<br />

contributors,<br />

declare, explicitly or implicitly, that unless a thinker can conceive <strong>of</strong> God as real or,<br />

at a minimum, conceive that another can nondefensively conceive <strong>of</strong> God as real, he<br />

or she is significantly barred from understanding religious texts or religious belief.<br />

Psychoanalysts, by and large, are to be counted on the positive or negative side <strong>of</strong><br />

this minimum provision (Smith and Handelman 1990: xi).<br />

Loewald was the first psychoanalytic supervisor <strong>of</strong> Stanley Leavy. Maintaining a Christian<br />

faith with his analytic thinking, Leavy drew on Romantic literature, Loewald, Lacan, Buber<br />

and Ricoeur to <strong>of</strong>fer a hermeneutic <strong>of</strong> interpretative dialogue that valued religious beliefs,<br />

described by Meissner as ‘eloquent and pr<strong>of</strong>oundly meaningful’ (Leavy 1988). 129 Leavy<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered a different theological perspective to those adopted by Meissner and Rizzuto, where<br />

Leavy sees psychoanalysis becoming a new form <strong>of</strong> revealing, that enhances the creative<br />

actions <strong>of</strong> God in each person. Leavy was one <strong>of</strong> the few psychoanalysts engaging with<br />

religion that recognized its vital community dimension, taking it outside the internal<br />

psychoanalytic realm or limits <strong>of</strong> religious experience. Religion becomes ‘the recognition<br />

by a community <strong>of</strong> a real being or beings transcending sense experience, with whom the<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the community exist in a mutual relationship’ (Smith and Handelman 1990: xi).<br />

Another was James Jones an Episcopal priest, philosopher <strong>of</strong> religion, clinical psychologist<br />

and psychoanalytic practitioner. He utilizes Winnicott, Stern, Kohut, Meissner, Rizzuto,<br />

Loewald and Leavy’s ideas bringing them into dialogue with Otto, Tillich, Buber and Bollas<br />

on the subject <strong>of</strong> the sacred. Jones’ creativity and desire for dialogue <strong>of</strong>fered a theological<br />

128 This included contributions from Meissner and Leavy. Loewald and Meissner had previously co-written a<br />

report on metapsychology, but this makes no reference to religion (Loewald and Meissner 1976).<br />

129 These ideas combined to became In the image <strong>of</strong> God: A psychoanalyst’s view (Leavy 1988).<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!