20.11.2012 Views

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

engagement see little relevance for Freud’s later more speculative writings, viewing only his<br />

central theories as those essential for the clinical task (Perelberg 2005a), and claim ‘Like its<br />

founder most psychoanalysts are not religious’ (Budd and Rusbridger 2005: 2). By contrast<br />

psychoanalysts adopting relational or intersubjective perspectives see issues <strong>of</strong> religion and<br />

spirituality playing an important role (Eagle 1984; Rubin 1998, 2004; Eigen 2001b, 2004;<br />

Rabate 2003). <strong>Psychoanalysis</strong> then is an evolving term that cannot be captured by one<br />

specific definition but an important reflexive question remains ‘How do I define<br />

contemporary psychoanalysis?’<br />

<strong>Psychoanalysis</strong> is not a definitive body <strong>of</strong> knowledge that attains the status <strong>of</strong> truth as Freud<br />

hoped. 54 Yet its central concepts and practices are truth-and-meaning-bearing and this<br />

enables a truer knowledge to be discerned and experienced. Neither is psychoanalysis<br />

simply functional, focused on particular aspects <strong>of</strong> training and practice. It is rather a<br />

relational encounter between two people, one <strong>of</strong> whom has been trained to examine the<br />

unconscious, theirs and others, adhering to a body <strong>of</strong> knowledge originating in Freud and<br />

accommodating contemporary understandings <strong>of</strong> the self in relation to self, community,<br />

culture and the Other. This two-person relationship generates an intersubjective ‘space’,<br />

consciously and unconsciously peopled by internal objects/inner presences, where one can<br />

rediscover the narratives <strong>of</strong> the human spirit/soul. This psychoanalytic ‘space’ has the<br />

potential to facilitate or create transcendent encounter that finds parallels in the language<br />

and experience <strong>of</strong> mysticism, but is not mysticism. Such encounter points beyond the self<br />

while being experienced within the self. The key tool in this process is the free association<br />

<strong>of</strong> ideas, feelings, memories, and events that can be inhibited by dominant discourses and<br />

54 Phillips recognizes that there are ‘those <strong>of</strong> us who do not want the sadomasochistic fantasy <strong>of</strong> truth in<br />

scientific psychoanalysis - truth, that is, as something to which we are obliged to submit’ (Phillips 1993: xvi).<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!