20.11.2012 Views

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 4. A personal dialectic interpretative framework<br />

Pfister pioneered religious and psychoanalytic engagement holding together conflicting<br />

paradigms through personal relationship with Freud. His work and letters reveal an<br />

oscillation between the two in the form <strong>of</strong> a personal dialectic, as illustrated by the zig-zag<br />

central section <strong>of</strong> figure 4. While Pfister’s work was pioneering and linked to his close<br />

friendship with Freud, it does lack a critical dimension, the exception being his The Illusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> a Future (Pfister 1993), his response to Freud’s provocative The Future <strong>of</strong> an Illusion<br />

(Freud 1927). Fromm was a later pioneer that adopted such a dialectical approach, but who<br />

added a breadth and depth <strong>of</strong> critical insight missing in Pfister (Fromm 1950, 1957, 1963,<br />

1967; Suzuki, Fromm, and DeMartino 1960).<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> the psychoanalysts identified in the chapters that form part B (as well as chapter<br />

three, part A) adopted this approach. This dialectic framework was transitional and more<br />

prevalent in the early history <strong>of</strong> psychoanalysis. The disadvantage <strong>of</strong> this approach was that<br />

it allowed people to keep two aspects <strong>of</strong> the self, the psychoanalytic and the<br />

religious/spiritual in separate compartments, with the potential to perpetuate an unhealthy<br />

312

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!