20.11.2012 Views

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

415<br />

416<br />

417<br />

418<br />

419<br />

420<br />

421<br />

422<br />

423<br />

424<br />

425<br />

426<br />

427<br />

428<br />

429<br />

430<br />

431<br />

432<br />

433<br />

434<br />

435<br />

436<br />

437<br />

438<br />

439<br />

440<br />

441<br />

442<br />

443<br />

444<br />

445<br />

know that noisy dialogue between hard thinkers I think increasingly does not appeal to<br />

most <strong>of</strong> us, I think there is more awareness (pause, s<strong>of</strong>t) that the world is very<br />

complex and simple solutions even hard psychoanalysis so to speak are just not good<br />

enough.<br />

AR: So in some ways it might be that psychoanalysis has become relocated within the<br />

cultural understanding <strong>of</strong> our world in one, twenty or thirty years ago it would have<br />

been a hard science evidence type approach to say well psychoanalysis says the future<br />

<strong>of</strong> religion is an illusion, Freud said this and that would have been taken pretty much<br />

as read by a lot <strong>of</strong> people<br />

DB: yeah<br />

AR: Whereas I think obviously postmodernism has broken to some extent the power,<br />

<strong>of</strong> the hold <strong>of</strong> master grand narratives<br />

DB: yes<br />

AR: that we can’t look for global solutions in that way and maybe it’s the shadow side<br />

<strong>of</strong> postmodernism is that it’s not that you don’t believe in anything but can you<br />

believe in anything is the paradox, you can’t believe that but what can you believe in?<br />

DB: The answer is the contemplative position (laugh) despite all that.<br />

AR: So there is you are saying you are suggesting is there are new ways <strong>of</strong> bringing<br />

aspects together that different analysts are trying to develop uhm (pause) because<br />

certainly if I look at the analysts that have written about spirituality (pause) it is quite<br />

hard to find them. I mean I think Ana-Maria Rizzuto’s book was very influential, but<br />

that came out in 1979 followed by Meissner, you can track a strand, a particular strand<br />

DB: yes<br />

AR: a route, but in terms <strong>of</strong> British perspective there are occasional articles and<br />

references in journals but until uhm (pause) well there was a 1990 conference<br />

‘psychoanalysis and religion’ held at the Freud museum<br />

DB: Oh yes<br />

AR: and Ivan Ward edited a book <strong>of</strong> that so the chapter by, did you contribute to that?<br />

DB: Yes, yes. A little book ‘Why is psychoanalysis another religion’<br />

AR: Yes. I remembered that as I was driving here this morning. I’ve got it somewhere<br />

I would have re-read it but really that seems to have been the first time that it was<br />

376

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!