20.11.2012 Views

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a form <strong>of</strong> dualism that despite these points <strong>of</strong> encounter, religion was transcendent from<br />

psychoanalysis and not changed by psychoanalysis (Jones 1991).<br />

The theme <strong>of</strong> dialogue was a metaphor Leavy used consistently, at heart psychoanalysis is a<br />

special form <strong>of</strong> encounter (Leavy 2005a, 2005b), as is religion. <strong>Psychoanalysis</strong> is an<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> psychic reality and solitude which promotes a private self, uniquely reached<br />

by psychoanalysis and religion (Fabricius 1996). Yet religion for Leavy was always<br />

community.<br />

I define religion as the recognition by a community <strong>of</strong> a real being, how with or <strong>of</strong><br />

beings transcending sense experience, with whom the members <strong>of</strong> the community<br />

exist in a mutual relationship … personal religious commitment finds a symbolic<br />

language as it has originated in and has been transmitted by a community ... the<br />

religious essential <strong>of</strong> relationship with a transcendent being (Leavy 1990: 47).<br />

What distinguished Leavy from Meissner or Rizzuto is the focus on the reality and truth <strong>of</strong><br />

God, rather than on religious experience. ‘That God exists is the heart <strong>of</strong> religious belief <strong>of</strong><br />

any sort we are likely to encounter in psychoanalytic work’ (Leavy 1990: 49) yet this poses<br />

a problem as ‘the non-existence <strong>of</strong> God may be built into analysts’ deepest convictions’<br />

(Leavy 1990: 49). Leavy challenges this, using the work <strong>of</strong> Loewald on the psychoanalytic<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> internalization, applying it to the central truth <strong>of</strong> the Christian faith, the death and<br />

resurrection <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ. He then addresses issues <strong>of</strong> the Christian faith as illustrative <strong>of</strong><br />

all beliefs, 231 before concluding that analysts need an openness to see new meaning and<br />

engage with the dialogue <strong>of</strong> belief.<br />

leap <strong>of</strong> faith is made with eyes wide open. The questioning goes on’ (Leavy 2005a: 162f.). Originally<br />

published in 1982, this was the conclusion <strong>of</strong> Leavy’s address honouring the work <strong>of</strong> biblical theologian Hans<br />

Frei (they were colleagues at Yale) who was a significant figure in the evolution <strong>of</strong> narrative theology (Fodor<br />

2005). Like Frei, Leavy saw a parallel in their questioning <strong>of</strong> traditional interpretation and authority.<br />

231 In Christianity, Jesus Christ is ‘the centre <strong>of</strong> religious experience. Christ is not only the ultimate love<br />

object, which the believer loses as an external object and regains by identification with him as ego ideal. He<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!