20.11.2012 Views

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

Sacred Psychoanalysis - etheses Repository - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Gay’s work is less than convincing in places. First, he fails to address the limitation <strong>of</strong><br />

Freud’s understanding <strong>of</strong> religion and remains within a Modernist reductive paradigm. Gay<br />

thought Freud’s understanding <strong>of</strong> religion was correct therefore he saw no need to engage<br />

with the nature <strong>of</strong> religious and spiritual experience and ‘treats religion as a caricature <strong>of</strong><br />

what it is’ (Ostow 1989: 119), continuing ‘a reductionist attitude to spiritual matters within<br />

the discipline’ (Simmonds 2004: 953). Secondly, there is considerable variation in what<br />

Freud said about religion, especially his early Jewish origins that are not as easily dismissed<br />

as Gay suggests (Ostow 1989). This subject has been explored in detail from both Christian<br />

and Jewish perspectives (Yerushalmi 1991; Rizzuto 1998; Halpern 1999). 207 Fine and<br />

Collins (Fine and Collins 1991), reviewing Gay’s acclaimed biography <strong>of</strong> Freud,<br />

demonstrate that Gay’s views in A Godless Jew are at variance with this later work. 208<br />

Thirdly, following Freud, Gay’s rejection <strong>of</strong> religion on the basis <strong>of</strong> it being an illusion fails<br />

to account for the vital role illusion plays in psychic development. Gay fails to<br />

acknowledge or make reference to Winnicott (or Bion) despite citing Rizzuto and Meissner<br />

in whose work Winnicott plays a crucial role. 209<br />

The significance <strong>of</strong> Gay’s work is that it suggests that psychoanalysis in the mid to late<br />

1980s had still not fully embraced concepts by Winnicott and Bion, which were to form the<br />

backbone <strong>of</strong> the engagement between religion, spirituality and psychoanalysis. 210 Meissner<br />

207 Loewenberg’s review <strong>of</strong> Yerushalmi’s work is perceptive, suggesting that he so wishes to persuade us <strong>of</strong><br />

Freud’s Jewish identity at the other extreme from Gay, that he misses key references. He suggests most<br />

scholars are found within the spectrum established by Gay and Yerushalmi. ‘The truth is that we need and use<br />

… the multiple Jewish and not-so-Jewish secular Freud’ (Loewenberg 1992: 511).<br />

208 ‘How and why did a Godless Jew discover psychoanalysis? Perhaps the answer concerns his marginality –<br />

a Jew examining his inner and outer being during the declining Hapsburg Empire … that had repression at its<br />

core, hypocrisy at its roots, and anti-Semitism as its perverse élan vital’ (Fine and Collins 1991: 363).<br />

209 Another critical review was produced by Roazen (Roazen 1989).<br />

210 Rizzuto <strong>of</strong>fered a generous review concluding, ‘As a historian, Gay has presented the analytic community<br />

with a much-needed survey <strong>of</strong> Freud's relation to religion and to his Jewishness. As Freud's partisan and<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!