10.12.2012 Views

Schaff - History of the Christian Church Vol. 8 - Media Sabda Org

Schaff - History of the Christian Church Vol. 8 - Media Sabda Org

Schaff - History of the Christian Church Vol. 8 - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

482<br />

French ed. L’accord passé, etc., Gen., 1551. In Opera, VII. 689–748.<br />

The Latin text also in Niemeyer’s Collectio Conf, pp. 191–217. A<br />

German translation (Die Zuericher Uebereinkunft) in Bickel’s<br />

Bekenntnissschriften der evang. reform. Kirche, pp. 173–181. Comp.<br />

<strong>the</strong> correspondence <strong>of</strong> Calvin with Bullinger, Farel, etc., concerning <strong>the</strong><br />

Consensus.—Calvin’s polemical writings against Joachim Westphal,<br />

namely, Defensio sanae et orthodoxae doctrinae de sacramentis,<br />

Geneva, 1554, Zuerich, 1555; Secunda Defensio ... contra Westphali<br />

calumnias, Gen., 1556; and Ultima Admonitio ad Westphalum, Gen.,<br />

1557. In Opera, IX. 1–120, 137–252. Lastly, his book against<br />

Tilemann Hesshus (Hesshusen), Dilucida Explicatio sanae doctrinae<br />

de vera participatione carnis et sanguinis Christi in sacra Coena, ad<br />

discutiendas Heshusii nebulas, Gen., 1561. In Opera, IX. 457–524. (In<br />

<strong>the</strong> Amsterdam ed., Tom. IX. 648–723.) Klebiz <strong>of</strong> Heidelberg, Beza,<br />

and Pierre Boquin also took part in <strong>the</strong> controversy with Hesshus.<br />

II. For a comparative statement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eucharistic views <strong>of</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

Zwingli, and Calvin, see this <strong>History</strong>, vol. VI. 669–682; and Creeds <strong>of</strong><br />

Christendom, I. 455 sqq.; 471 sqq. Calvin’s doctrine has been fully set<br />

forth by EBRARD in fils Dogma v. heil. Abendmahl, II. 402–525, and<br />

by NEVIN in his Mystical Presence, Philad., 1846, pp. 54–67; and in <strong>the</strong><br />

“Mercersburg Review” for September, 1850, pp. 421–548 (against Dr.<br />

Hodge in <strong>the</strong> “Princeton Review” for 1848). Comp. also §§ 132–134<br />

below; HENRY, P. I. ch. XIII.; and STAEHELIN, II. 189 sqq.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> eucharistic controversy, which raged with such fury in <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Reformation, and was <strong>the</strong> chief cause <strong>of</strong> separation in its ranks, Calvin<br />

consistently occupied from <strong>the</strong> beginning to <strong>the</strong> end <strong>the</strong> position <strong>of</strong> a<br />

mediator and peacemaker between <strong>the</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>rans and Zwinglians, between<br />

Wittenberg and Zuerich.<br />

The way for a middle <strong>the</strong>ory was prepared by <strong>the</strong> Tetrapolitan or Swabian<br />

Confession, drawn up by Martin Bucer, a born compromiser, during <strong>the</strong><br />

Diet <strong>of</strong> Augsburg, 1530, f863 and by <strong>the</strong> Wittenberg Concordia, 1536, which<br />

for a while satisfied <strong>the</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>rans, but was justly rejected by <strong>the</strong> Swiss.<br />

Calvin published his <strong>the</strong>ory in its essential features in <strong>the</strong> first edition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Institutes (1536), more fully in <strong>the</strong> second edition (1539), <strong>the</strong>n in a special<br />

tract written at Strassburg. He defended it in various publications, and<br />

adhered to it with his usual firmness. It was accepted by <strong>the</strong> Reformed<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es, and never rejected by Lu<strong>the</strong>r; on <strong>the</strong> contrary, he is reported to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!