10.12.2012 Views

Schaff - History of the Christian Church Vol. 8 - Media Sabda Org

Schaff - History of the Christian Church Vol. 8 - Media Sabda Org

Schaff - History of the Christian Church Vol. 8 - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

748<br />

IX.). Scaliger says: “Calvin is alone among <strong>the</strong>ologians; <strong>the</strong>re is no<br />

ancient to compare with him.” The term oJ qeolo>gov, as a title <strong>of</strong><br />

special distinction, was flrst given to <strong>the</strong> Apostle John, and afterwards<br />

to Gregory Nazianzen; in both cases with special reference to <strong>the</strong><br />

advocacy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> divinity <strong>of</strong> Christ (<strong>the</strong> qeo>thv tou’ lo>gou). Calvin<br />

earned <strong>the</strong> title in a more comprehensive sense, as covering <strong>the</strong> whole<br />

field <strong>of</strong> exegetical, dogmatic, and polemic <strong>the</strong>ology.<br />

ft360 Expressed in <strong>the</strong> formula <strong>of</strong> Cyprian: “extra ecclesiam [Romanam]<br />

nulla salus.” Cyprian was logically right, but <strong>the</strong>ologically wrong,<br />

when, in his controversy with <strong>the</strong> Roman bishop, he denied <strong>the</strong> validity<br />

<strong>of</strong> heretical and schismatical baptism.<br />

ft361 Harnack excludes Calvinism and Arminianism from his<br />

Dogmengeschichte, while he devotes to Socinianism, which is not<br />

nearly as important, no less than thirty-eight pages (III. 653-691). A<br />

strange omission in this important work, completed in 1890. He<br />

explains this omission (in a private letter to me, dated March 3, 1891)<br />

on <strong>the</strong> ground that he includes Calvinism and Arminianism in <strong>the</strong><br />

Entwicklungsgeschichte des Protestantismus, which he did not intend<br />

to treat in his Dogmengeschichte.<br />

ft362 Beza says: “In <strong>the</strong> doctrine which he delivered at first, Calvin persisted<br />

steadily to <strong>the</strong> last, scarcely making any change.”<br />

ft363 See <strong>the</strong>se and o<strong>the</strong>r remarkable judgments quoted more fully in § 110.<br />

ft364 The Period <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reformation, ed. by Oncken, transl. by Mrs. Sturgis<br />

(New York, 1874), p. 255.<br />

ft365 Lu<strong>the</strong>r and O<strong>the</strong>r Leaders <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reformation, p. 264 sq. (3d ed.<br />

1883).<br />

ft366 George Bancr<strong>of</strong>t, <strong>the</strong> historian <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States, derives <strong>the</strong> free<br />

institutions <strong>of</strong> America chiefly from Calvinism through <strong>the</strong> medium <strong>of</strong><br />

Puritanism. It is certain that, in <strong>the</strong> colonial period, Calvinism was <strong>the</strong><br />

most powerful factor in <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ology, and religious life <strong>of</strong> America; but<br />

since <strong>the</strong> close <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eighteenth century, Arminian Methodism fairly<br />

divides <strong>the</strong> field with it and is numerically <strong>the</strong> strongest denomination in<br />

<strong>the</strong> United States at <strong>the</strong> present day. The Baptists, who come next in<br />

numerical strength, <strong>the</strong> Presbyterians, <strong>the</strong> Congregationalists, and <strong>the</strong><br />

Dutch and German Reformed rank on <strong>the</strong> Calvinistic, but <strong>the</strong><br />

Protestant Episcopalians and Lu<strong>the</strong>rans, predominantly on <strong>the</strong><br />

Arminian side. The Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>, however, leaves room for <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!